The Federalists view of the Constitution was one that questioned the compromises required in ratification of the Constitution as compared to the provisions of the 'Articles of Confederation'. However, there was more faith in and respect among Antifederalists for legislative power and it was their belief that "bicameralism and the separation of powers" was the appropriate means for checking the system. The Federalists viewed these checks and balance devices as merely checks on the power of the legislature and a tool in driving the power of the executive and judicial branches of government. Concerns of the Antifederalists included concerns over taxation of citizens and the possible enslavement of citizens to the government in its power to tax and as well they questioned how limited a congress actually was that had the power to pass all laws with only the requirement that the laws be "necessary and proper." (Semonche, 2003; p.3) the Antifederalists were further concerned because they contended that there was a departure of the Constitution in the conference of powers on government rather than what they viewed should be a limiting of those government powers. The Constitutional debate in Philadelphia lasted under the period of a year and the Antifederalists concluded that the document was legitimate...
The Ant federalist legacy lives still and the debate of 1787 which took place in Philadelphia lives on in today's political landscape in the United States.Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now