Georgia Laws Regarding Employment Discrimination Research Paper

Employment Discrimination Advocacy

Advocacy groups exist in a few different forms, some that work on federal issues, and others that are more focused on state issues. States have the right to pass laws that offer protections that go beyond the federal laws -- the Civil Rights Act is the baseline federal standard. As an example, the federal policy on sexual orientation as a protected class relies largely on EEOC rulings, as it is not written into federal law. Several states have therefore chosen to write their own employment discrimination laws to extend protections to other classes than those who are covered under federal law. The state laws may also apply to more companies, as under federal law a company must have 15 employees in order for the law to apply.

States that lack employment discrimination protections will often have advocacy groups that are fighting at the state level to have protections extended to those who have not enjoyed such protections previously. One such group is Georgia Equality, which has a mission to "advance fairness, safety and opportunity for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender communities" (GeorgiaEquality.org, 2016). Georgia is one of 28 states that do not offer protections to workers on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. The group works with other like-minded advocacy groups, including those who have had success and those working on states like Georgia that do not offer protections at the state level.

Level

As noted, Georgia Equality is working at the state level, where it seeks to have the State of Georgia enact a law that offers employment discrimination protection for LGBT people. The group notes that the EEOC ruling in July 2015 that Title VII includes protection based on sexual orientation, but the ruling this is just a legal pathway. The wording regarding LGBT...

...

The EEOC is building a body of cases that it will be using as precedent, but there are still opportunities for discrimination to legally exist. At issue is the fact that there are gaps in the law, and gaps in the rulings, and that these will take time to fill in. Until they do, and especially until the LGBT people are granted protections under the Civil Rights Act, they may still face discrimination.
Further, the fact that state laws do not offer any such protections means that the state laws offer no safeguard against discrimination, either for people who are unsuccessful with their claims at the federal level, or for people who work for an organization not currently covered by the federal legislation. Georgia Equality seeks remedy in the form of a law at the state level that prohibits employment discrimination based on LGBT status. The Georgia Code provides for protection from discrimination based on gender and based on disability, but not other traits.

Definition of the Problem and Strategies to Solve it

The problem is defined as an existing gap between federal rulings, federal legislation and state legislation that allows for discrimination of all LGBT persons in Georgia based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. The EEOC rulings provide some protection, but this is a fairly new development and without specific laws discrimination might still be possible in companies covered by federal law. In companies not covered by federal law, there are no protections. The advocacy group is focused on all forms of discrimination against LGBT people, so they advocate against discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodation. With employment, they have adopted the federal standard that covers discrimination…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

City of Atlanta (2016). Non-discrimination laws. City of Atlanta. Retrieved from http://www.atlantaga.gov/index.aspx?page=1089

Georgia Code. O.C.G.A. § 34-5-1 (2015). Retrieved from LexisNexis.

GeorgiaEquality.org (2016) Nondiscrimination. Georgia Equality. Retrieved from http://georgiaequality.org/issues/nondiscrimination/

GeorgiaEquality.org (2016, 2) Workplace fairness. Georgia Equality. Retrieved from http://georgiaequality.org/workplace-fairness/
Hammel, J. (2016). Athens locals push for anti-discrimination ordinance. The Red & Black. Retrieved from http://www.redandblack.com/athensnews/athens-locals-lead-push-for-anti-discrimination-ordinance/article_94ebf7fe-e07a-11e5-bb9c-474ae5b7230f.html
McDonald, L. (2016). Fight for freedom: Georgia religious liberty bills clash with Athens non-discrimination orders. The Red & Black. Retrieved from http://www.redandblack.com/athensnews/fight-for-freedom-georgia-religious-liberty-bills-clash-with-athens/article_ca9c6c04-cae4-11e5-975a-d3d7b0cc15c7.html


Cite this Document:

"Georgia Laws Regarding Employment Discrimination" (2016, May 05) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/georgia-laws-regarding-employment-discrimination-2157194

"Georgia Laws Regarding Employment Discrimination" 05 May 2016. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/georgia-laws-regarding-employment-discrimination-2157194>

"Georgia Laws Regarding Employment Discrimination", 05 May 2016, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/georgia-laws-regarding-employment-discrimination-2157194

Related Documents

Employment Discrimination and Globalization Entity type and location. This business start-up, registered as Sexy Shoes for Her, Inc., is a single-member Limited Liability Company taxed as a corporation (IRS, 2011). All stock is held by the principle and by members of the principle's immediate and extended family, such that, even though the firm is not a corporation, its membership resembles that of a closely-held corporation. The organization process has been completed,

Transgender Employment Discrimination There is a growing body of evidence that transgender individuals frequently experience some type of discrimination during the employment process in the United States today. Although there are only a few high-profile cases, there are a significant number of employment claims being asserted. In terms of numbers, the high was reached in 1994 when almost 92,000 discrimination charges were filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Since that

Economic Motivators for Employers on Employment Rates for People With Disabilities in Atlanta Qualitative Research Quantitative Research Definition of Disability Statistics for Individuals with Disabilities Effects Of ADA On Persons With Disabilities Economic Motivators for Employers Hiring People with Disabilities Factors Affecting Economic Motivators for Employers Lack of Information and Knowledge Regarding Economic Motivators Misconception about Individuals with Disabilities Inaccessible Hiring Strategies Conflicts with Existing Programs Lack of Appropriate Planning and Difficulties in implementations Economic Incentive Programs Unemployment Among People with Disabilities Summary Conclusion CHAPTER

adults have an episode or two from their youth of which they are not extremely proud. Perhaps it involved sneaking a beer (or several beers) at a social function, or lying about one's plans for the evening to get permission to attend a questionable event. Most kids have learned the hard way on at least a few experiences -- speeding, missing curfew, or cheating on a test. Younger children

ER Practices in Atlanta
PAGES 5 WORDS 28237

Economic Motivators for Employers on Employment Rates for People With Disabilities in Atlanta Qualitative Research Quantitative Research Definition of Disability Statistics for Individuals with Disabilities Effects Of ADA On Persons With Disabilities Economic Motivators for Employers Hiring People with Disabilities Factors Affecting Economic Motivators for Employers Lack of Information and Knowledge Regarding Economic Motivators Misconception about Individuals with Disabilities Inaccessible Hiring Strategies Conflicts with Existing Programs Lack of Appropriate Planning and Difficulties in implementations Economic Incentive Programs Unemployment Among People with Disabilities Summary Conclusion CHAPTER

Racial Discrimination and the Death Penalty The United States Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics reported that at the end of the year 2000 that there was 1,381,892 total number of prisoners under the jurisdiction of federal or state adult correctional authorities (State pp). During 2000, the prison population rose at the lowest rate since 1972 and had the smallest absolute increase since 1980 (State pp). Relative to the number