Health Care Institutional Organization and Management Question 1: Critical Thinking and Blooms Taxonomy Revised

1. What are the pros and cons of this approach to learning about healthcare?

Bloom’s Taxonomy revised comprises of the following six dimensions as illustrated below:

There are advantages to Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy as an approach to learning about health care. One of the benefits is that it is purposed to enable the educators to ascertain the logical and knowledgeable level at which the individual learners are capable of working. There is also the advantage that it assists the learners to scrutinize further to ask questions that are exceedingly challenging in addition to forming instructions that are purposed at enhancing critical thinking as they endeavor to reach the three highest levels of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation as the learners get prepared to attain such levels. Bloom’s taxonomy is a significantly potent tool that can be effortlessly applied in the health care profession. Greater cognitive thinking has a tendency to further alluring the comprehension of other associated content like problem-solving, carrying out an evaluation of judgment, in addition to reflection. Furthermore, this approach is beneficial in encouraging and teaching a learner how to carry out their individual decisions not only within a classroom environment but also is beneficial in the promotion of practical health care skills (Verenna et al., 2018).

There are several shortcomings in the approach. To begin with, it instigates the conviction that higher-order thinking can be existent in seclusion with particular content. Secondly, the approach has been employed in the devaluation of basic skills of learning and, in its place, has promoted higher-order thinking. As a result of the de-emphasis on these basic skills, it results in the learners lacking preparation for higher-order thinking (Booker, 2007).

2. Is this consistent with how you've learned in the past?

This is in line with how...

The following diagram below illustrates the organizational chart of the health care organization.
Source Link: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Organizational-Chart-of-Leadership-at-the-Mayo-Clinic-the-parent-organization-changed_fig2_234069825

Mayo Clinic employs a hybrid organizational structure, with the structure being a blend and amalgamation of the functional organizational structure together with the geographical and projected organizational structure. This particular structure plays a significant role in the operations of the organization based on the actuality that personnel can share their knowledge and competencies across the various functional divisions, permitting for better and more effective communication, in addition to understanding the role of every function. Furthermore, by working in tandem with the different functions, the personnel can widen their set of skills and knowledge, which also facilitates growth within the organization (Jensen and Heckling, 1995).

Question 3: To Be or Not to Be (Part of a System)

Taking into consideration the operational environment of Mayo Clinic, it is perceptible that it is part of a vertically integrated system. This is a strategy that has been employed by the organization in attaining control over its different entities to increase the organization’s power. Vertically and horizontally integrated structures have different advantages and disadvantages. When horizontal integration is successful, it can generate increased revenue, in comparison to companies that perform independent operations. Horizontal integration results in decline in competition, owing to which a monopoly emanates in the market.

Furthermore, this makes it possible for the organizations to diversify their products and services, permitting it to offer a greater amount of product features…