Income Statement Contribution Method Revenue Research Proposal

PAGES
1
WORDS
371
Cite

¶ … Income Statement

Contribution Method

Revenue

$5,985,000

$5,985,000

Variable mfg cost

$1,543,500

Variable op cost

$414,000

Total Variable cost

$1,957,500

$1,957,500

Contribution

$4,027,500

Fixed Costs

Mfg Overhead

$1,600,000

$1,200,000

Total Fixed Costs

$2,800,000

$2,800,000

Net Profit

$1,227,500

Absorption Method

Revenue

$6,555,000

COGS

$1,690,500

Operating Expense

$2,014,000

S&A Expense

$1,200,000

Net Income

$1,650,500

The main difference between the contribution method is that it factors in the cost of goods sold for the goods produced that year. Production costs factor in the inventory at the beginning and end of the period. This makes the contribution margin approach valuable from a management accounting perspective because it provides more direct insight into the cost structure of the year's revenues.

The absorption method is more suitable for financial accounting. The method is valuable because it outlines the year's activities. The cost of goods sold includes the cost of the beginning inventory, but not the cost of the ending inventory. This is more in line with GAAP than is contribution margin.

We can see that one of the most significant differences is that the contribution margin method gives a different profit for the period compared with the absorption method. This is the result of the decline in inventory levels. If the inventory levels had not changed, there would have been no difference between the net profit for the two methods.

If the company sold another 10,000 units, it would have a higher profit. This calculation was based on the contribution margin method. What occurs in this method is that the company sells more, but it does not produce more. Therefore, the variable operating and selling cost increases, but the variable production cost does not increase. The inventory is run down further than in the first example, increasing the spread between the profit in the two methods.

I would recommend to management that the absorption method is used to calculate these costs. Because the costs are matched up more closely with sales, the resulting figures give management a better figure of the cost of the goods sold for the year. This reduces the impact that management can have on the results, which could under the contribution margin method be subject to managerial manipulation through manipulation of production levels at the end of one period, which would lower the cost at the beginning of the next.

Cite this Document:

"Income Statement Contribution Method Revenue" (2010, February 04) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/income-statement-contribution-method-revenue-15313

"Income Statement Contribution Method Revenue" 04 February 2010. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/income-statement-contribution-method-revenue-15313>

"Income Statement Contribution Method Revenue", 04 February 2010, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/income-statement-contribution-method-revenue-15313

Related Documents

Managerial Accounting E-Company Income Statement Contribution Margin For Period Ended Dec 31, 20XX Revenue less V Mfg Cost less V Op/Selling Cost Gross Profit (Contribution Margin) Fixed Mfg Overhead Fixed S&A Exp Total Fixed Costs Net Income $4,765,000 E-Company Income Statement Absorption Method For Period ended Dec 31, 20XX Revenue Less Mfg Cost Less Op/Selling Cost Less S&A Exp Net Income $5,485,500 The gross profit margin is 75.6%. This is calculated as the (revenue -- cogs) / revenue (Investopedia, 2011). The contribution margin is similar, but does not include costs associated with goods

Revenue Recognition Revenue is a mode of taxation that is charged by the central governing authority for the purpose of generation income for the government. Revenue is charged on various items from the companies or on businesses that are conducted within the jurisdiction of the ruling authority (Bragg, 2010). Revenue generation is a process that is crucial as it touches on the income and profit made by the body that is

Tax Revenue Analysis for the
PAGES 10 WORDS 3540

The general fund collects over 86% of the total tax revenues and is the primary funding source for most commonwealth agencies. General fund tax revenues The largest significant source of tax revenues net of refunds is personal income tax. Reported personal income tax accounts for 38% of all tax revenues reported. Sales tax, which represents a tax on various items purchased by consumers, is the second largest category. Reported sales tax

Accounting Process and Financial Statements. A reliable internal system of accounting is an essential element of a solvent profit or nonprofit business entity. By recording virtually every business activity or endeavor, with regards to the creation of monetary inflows of sales revenue and monetary outflows of expenses resulting from operating activities; an accounting system should provide the financial information needed to evaluate the profitability or effectiveness of past and operations.

Financial Statements Importance of Financial Statements The Importance of Accurate Financial Statements to Outside Business Interests The four financial statements are the balance sheet, income statement, statement of cash flow, and statement of owner's equity. All of these statements are interactive even though they each serve a unique purpose. They are intended to assess the health of a business and their accuracy is vitally important to investors, creditors and other outside interests.

Thus, the per capita tax revenue is presented in Table 5. Table 5: Ratio: Per Capital Tax Revenue ($Million) New York Activities 2010 2009 Tax Revenue $58,039 $55,804 Total Population 19,378,102 19,378,102 Ratio: Per Capital Tax Revenue $2,995: 1 $2,880: 1 Pennsylvania Tax Revenue $28,300 $27,600 Total Population 12,702,379 12,702,379 Ratio: Per Capital Tax Revenue $2,228:1 $2,173:1 The findings from table 5 reveal that both states record increase in per capital tax revenue at the end of the fiscal years 2009 to 2010. In the New York, the government realizes ratio of $2,880 per