¶ … Globalization Jonathan Zaun

In their insightful examinations of the indirect effects caused by the phenomenon of globalization, essayists Franklin Foer and Kwame Anthony Appiah adeptly address the alternative consequences of the increasing interconnection which has come to define this modern age. By analyzing the concept of globalization in far greater depth than their peers, forgoing outdated discussions about economic growth and greater global awareness for a more introspective debate on cultural identity, both authors have succeeded in casting a new light on the previously accepted notion of globalization as an engine of worldwide progress. Foer chooses to analyze America's cultural attitudes towards the sport of soccer, a traditionally European pursuit newly introduced to American society in the infancy of globalization, in an attempt to discern why this game has exacerbated divisions between the nation's upper and lower classes. In his essay, Appiah illustrates the proclivity expressed by all groups of people, whether through international debate or neighborhood gossip, to engage in what he terms "disagreements about questions value" (379). Although each author utilizes varying rhetorical strategies and intellectual models, the ideas posed by both Foer and Appiah have converged to demonstrate a newfound truth in the way globalization influences cultural and societal attitudes. Rather than dissolve the differences possessed by individual cultures through the direct sharing of traditions, norms and values, globalization instead serves to heighten our collective awareness, and indeed our sensitivity, to these differences.

Franklin Foer begins his analysis of globalization by making the bold claim that soccer, while not reaching the lofty heights of classical music or religious creed, is actually "often more deeply felt than religion, and just as much a part of the community's fabric, a repository...

It is Foer's contention that the sport of soccer represents the equivalent of higher culture to a certain segment of the population, namely the lower class, providing a source of unity to disaffected groups who may not feel that the embrace of national identity, shared so readily by the affluent, has been extended to them. While in many countries, such as Spain or England, the shared support of a soccer team may allow for a temporary lowering of long standing cultural barriers, Foer points out that the reverse has occurred thus far in America. By highlighting the underlying motivations of parents who shepherded their children towards soccer, the overwhelming fear of potential injury and an aversion towards true competition, Foer concludes that "soccer's appeal lay in its opposition to other sports" (409). This revelation is quite telling and helps explain the puzzling phenomenon of American antipathy towards soccer.
Although most Americans wishfully envision themselves as integrated partners within a national framework, the stark reality of class relations in this country is sadly different. Members of the lower class often share deep resentments towards society's so-called elite, and the adoption of soccer by the rich and comfortable immediately positioned the sport as a source of derision. Foer's recollection of the cultural issues which motivated parents to choose soccer as a pastime their children rather than the quintessential American sports of baseball, football or basketball underscores the deeply held, and often hidden, social differences which can be brought to the forefront by the increased awareness associated with globalization. When Foer recollects parents who "didn't want to teach the acceptability of violence" which is inherent in football, or those who wished to spare their kids from "too many stressful, potentially ego-deflating encounters" (409) that may result from baseball's reliance on…