Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Latin America: Political or Apolitical
Forrest Colburn argues in his book, Latin America at the End of Politics that ideological conflicts between the conservative and liberal ideologies have lost their pull in Latin America and a new more apolitical consensus about government has emerged regionally. This work will analyze and evaluate Colburn's claims regarding the new ideology of Latin America. Specifically, the work will compare Colburn's theories with the case material about Guatemala, Mexico, Cuba, Nicaragua, Chili and Brazil that can be found with Harry E. Vanden and Gary Prevost's book, Politics of Latin America: The Power Game. Colburn's core ideas are bolstered and contradicted within the case work mentioned but the overall impression of the work has much merit in the foundation of the political climate within Latin America.
Colburn's theories revolve around the idea that through the dramatic changes both within Latin America and around the world that have proven to be at least some proof that the old grand design schemes of some nations are unworkable. Sighting the dissolution of socialist governments around the world as evidence of the demise of grand design government plans Colburn makes his claims:
Latin America at the end of politics? Yes, of politics with a capital p. With the electoral defeat of the Sandinistas in Nicaragua, disenchantment with the Cuban Revolution, and arguably even more important, the collapse of socialism in Eastern Europe in 1989 and the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the impetus in Latin America for remaking state and society has withered. There is an end to ideological confrontation and contestation. (Colburn 2)
He goes on to say that for a myriad of reasons, social, economic and political Latin America has taken its place in the collective death of "high politics" or the type that drive ideological revolutions based on egalitarian ideals of a people driven government (noting the Bolshevik Revolution and the French Revolution). Colburn attests that in the place of this ideology of social change from below is a very fragile system of,...
"The region's democracies are fragile, inefficient, and chaotic in aggregating and implementing society's preferences. There is a lot of politics with a lower case p. Likewise, there are monopolies, weak regulation, and other impediments to a robust capitalism." (Colburn 2)
Taking these ideas forward there are many agreements within the work of Vanden and Prevost. The growth and intensity of capitalistic enterprises and possessions that has occurred through much of Latin America would certainly attest to an agreement with Colburn.
One sees major stock exchanges in San Paulo, Mexico City, Lima, Santiago and Buenos Aires; more and more manufactured goods or key components are being made in the region; and modern aspects of Western consumption such as computers, cable TV, mass retail stores, and the omnipresent auto are inundating national societies. Brazil is already the eighth largest economy in the world, and more and more products on the world market come from Brazil and other countries in the region...(Vanden & Prevost 174)
Vanden and Prevost go on to say that many areas of Latin America are gaining status through the social implications of some of the key indicators of capitalistic growth. "Mexico is generating more and more millionaires and now counts some of the wealthiest people in the world among its population." (Vanden & Prevost 174)
In addition to the remarkable financial changes within the Latin American countries there have also been other market changes that indicate Colburn's theory has a marked validity. One point that Vanden and Prevost make includes the reality of capitalistic privatization. "The new mantra is globalize, globalize, globalize and in Latin America it was combined with the specifically neoliberal mantra of privatize, privatize, privatize..." (Vanden & Prevost 167) It is important to note that the reasons that Vanden and Prevost give for the Latin American embrace of…
Works Cited
Colburn, Forrest D. Latin America at the End of Politics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Vanden, Harry E., Gary Prevost. Politics of Latin America: The Power Game. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2002.
Latin American Politics United States-Latin American relations have under went many changes during the 20th century, a time of intense U.S. involvement in the region. Describe the shifts as evidence by Gunboat Diplomacy, Good Neighbor Policy, Alliance for Progress, and The Reagan Doctrine. Explain the reasons behind each shift and also the underlying consistencies of U.S. Policy. Because of its geographic proximity to the United States, Latin America has been a key
The developmentalism of the Somoza era (over 40 years of repressive government) was "part of a comprehensive strategy" by the U.S. to: a) keep the Somoza family in power; b) to ward off influences by Cuba and the U.S.S.R.; and c) create "internationally backed institutions" like the "Nicaraguan Investment Corporation" (Cervantes-Rodriguez, 200). Meanwhile, another updated view reflects that today a few Latin America nations are emerging from "traditional agrarian to
While this may not sound controversial now, at the time it was, as Brazilian scientists and doctors would typically attempt to conform to whatever had recently been discovered in Western Europe without trying to generate any of their own original contributions to their fields. The Escola Tropicalista Bahiana, on the other hand, would attempt to merge tropical medicine with the latest European advances, in an effort to producing medical
Latin American History For the first two generations of Latin America's radicals, liberals and democrats, the legacy of the colonial past was a terrible burden that their countries had to overcome in order to achieve progress and social and economic development. That legacy included absolutism, arbitrary rule, aristocracy, feudalism, slavery, oppression of the indigenous peoples, lack of public education and the overwhelming power of the Catholic Church, backed by the state.
This leads to many false stereotypes and assumptions about cultures which most of us have never experienced. 2) When the structure of colonialism set in on Latin America, the Catholic Church established Counter-Reformation initiatives ordered by Spain's Holy Inquisition. The Counter-Reformation discouraged cultural endeavors in Latin America if they were not directly affiliated to specific Church celebrations. This resulted in much illiteracy and general ignorance of advances being made in
These indicate that they will not assimilate into the American way of life like European predecessors or Asian immigrants. Huntington estimates that, at worst, America will divide into an English-speaking "Anglo-American" and a Spanish-speaking MexAmerica. In addition to immigration woes, the second threat consists of identity politics and cultural relativism, which will undermine the current "Anglo-American" culture. The Mexican wave will reject individualism and uphold group rights. The last