Man With The Gash, A Essay

He also fails to stop the sailor from controlling him and he is absorbed by -- enslaved to -- his superstitions: This was the real Man with the Gash, the man who had so often robbed him in the spirit. This, then, was the embodied entity of the being whose astral form had been projected into his dreams, the man who had so frequently harbored designs against his hoard; hence -- there could be no other conclusion -- this Man with the Gash had now come in the flesh to dispossess him. And that gash! He could no more keep his eyes from it than stop the beating of his heart. Try as he would, they wandered back to that one point as inevitably as the needle to the pole.

Analysis of Kent's behavior shows us a man who was dazed by his grip for the gold. He was greedy, made irrational by his behavior, impulsive and rough due to his need to grip onto that gold at any price. Unable to think, he acted in one way after another and failed to think clearly. In Jacob Kent, we see an irrational man. When loading his gun, he does so with eyes closed trying not to see the scar. When approaching the sailor, he does so only with a great deal of effort in bearing the sight of the scar.

The sailor is right: the tragedy becomes a farce for Kent had rushed into motion not thinking beforehand that the sailor may be stronger and more youthful than he (as is the case) and may be able to overpower him:

Then, as the sailor had anticipated, the tragedy became a farce. Cardegee being the heavier of the two, Kent, throwing his body backward and down, could not lift him clear of the ground. Strain and strive to the uttermost, the sailor's feet still stuck to the floor and...

...

The remaining portion was supported by the point of contact just under his chin. Failing to swing him clear, Kent clung on, resolved to slowly throttle him or force him to tell what he had done with the hoard. But the Man with the Gash would not throttle. Five, ten, fifteen minutes passed, and at the end of that time, in despair, Kent let his prisoner down.
Kent did not consider the possibility of his losing since he was overwhelmed by his greed and need to act. He had not plotted all his options and ways of acting beforehand so confused was he by his greed. His greed clouded him, mad him unable to think clearly and brought him to his destruction.

The sailor on the other hand, unclouded by greed, was able to think clearly. He was supremely confident and assured of his strength and capability not allowing him to be afraid by anyone or by any situation. We may assume that he had a pure and innocent mind. Greed did not plunge him into any hole.

The story, the man with the gash is one that provides many lessons. The one that I find most forceful and inspiring is the contrast between Jacob Kent and the sailor. Jacob Kent, driven by his greed, was unable to think clearly and acted impulsively and in a confused way. He was therefore clearly mastered by the sailor who, not driven by greed, was able to think clearly and take control of the situation.

The story shows us how greed can cloud the thinking and drive a man into destruction. Kent was controlled by superstition and love for his money. This absorbed his thoughts and controlled his thinking and the result was inability to think clearly and his ruin.

Cite this Document:

"Man With The Gash A" (2012, December 12) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/man-with-the-gash-a-77057

"Man With The Gash A" 12 December 2012. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/man-with-the-gash-a-77057>

"Man With The Gash A", 12 December 2012, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/man-with-the-gash-a-77057

Related Documents

Its effects would have impact on the political decisions of all future generations; any mistake could have had disastrous consequences for the ones to come. Regarding the matter, the president at some point wrote to James Madison that given the historical circumstances and precedents his presidency constituted, he preferred that all decisions be made on a moral basis.. Washington couldn't have been more right; for instance, his refusal to

76). As automation increasingly assumes the more mundane and routine aspects of work of all types, Drucker was visionary in his assessment of how decisions would be made in the years to come. "In the future," said Drucker, "it was possible that all employment would be managerial in nature, and we would then have progressed from a society of labor to a society of management" (Witzel, p. 76). The

Baroque Painters The Techniques of Five Baroque Painters The Baroque era painters, different as they were in terms of personal style, approach, and technique, had in common the ability to imbue their works with a certain dramatic quality much in demand in the era. The Baroque had followed on the heels of the High Renaissance with its humanism and emerging scientifically revolutionary theses. The Protestant Reformation had begun and religious and political

English Civil War as a Background for Milton's Paradise Lost Political Foundations in Milton's Paradise Lost: Ties to the English Civil War Paradise Lost is an epic tale of defeat and the consequences which come from breaking with the proper form of divine rule. In his work, John Milton pits Satan and his army against God in Heaven, illustrating the notorious Christian battle within particularly political contexts. The English Civil War did

Otter and Crocket
PAGES 9 WORDS 3553

Otter and Crocket Crockett considered life as an absolute saga, coupled with the added charisma of undeniable reality and his virtue was that he was willing to devote his life for his loved ones and fellow countrymen. However in spite of his virtues there were also dubious elements involved in Crockett's activities, hence he cannot be considered as a completely virtuous person. Again with regard to William Otter, virtue was in

Scene Four: Parker Adderson, Philospher This scene will take place exactly as it does in the story. The stage will be divided into two parts. In center stage will be the tent with the Parker Adderson and the general. Adderson will be sitting across from the general at the table and will be questioned. The monologue will unfold with only this part of the stage being lit. After the fight, Adderson will