While this represents a significant portion of the government's operating income, higher inflation would generate even more seigniorage by requiring larger volumes (or simply higher denominations) of currency in circulation. If prevailing annualized inflation rises above 4.6% but remains below 9.0%, real seigniorage could climb to $130 billion, or about 6% of all federal receipts in a year like 2009 (U.S. Financial Management Budget).
In itself, cash carries an interest rate of zero and no central bank can reduce its rate targets below that level. This is the pernicious "liquidity trap" that the Open Market Committee has sought to avoid by guiding U.S. overnight rates close to zero while avoiding a formal move to that level (Svensson). Obviously, once nominal rates have dropped to zero, no further easing is possible, requiring monetary authorities to employ a different set of policy instruments.
Many of these instruments are effective to the extent to which they are explicitly or implicitly inflationary. Although the Fed's recent "credit easing" campaign and open market operations were primarily aimed at soothing extremely risk-averse credit markets, they also generated substantial "quantitative easing" in the sense that they dramatically increased the money supply. This would ordinarily create long-term inflation, which in itself stimulates consumption and investment in the near-term. As a last resort, formally or informally devaluing of the dollar against other global currencies would erode its buying power (feeding inflation) and so reduce the real cost of servicing dollar-denominated debt.
Swedish central banker Lars Svensson argues convincingly that these inflationary policies, far from being harmful to the economy, help to stimulate healthy expansion. An "inflationary psychology" supports behaviors and outcomes that deflationary environments do not. However, this psychology can only take root if consumers and investors believe that expanded money supply is relatively permanent:
A temporary targeted increase in the banks' reserves with the central bank would probably be completely ineffective. The problem here is, however, that there is no way for the central bank to make a credible commitment to a larger money supply in the future. There is nothing to prevent the central bank from reneging on such a commitment and reducing the money supply in the future in order to reduce future inflation and keep it in line with the inflation target (Svensson).
In an environment where qualitative easing has failed, accepting that inflation will be elevated in the future does not necessarily entail embracing the hyperinflationary forces that poisoned the U.S. economy in the 1970s or Europe in the 1920s. Instead, it is a form of tough -- and credible -- medicine for a fiscal system that is choking on its debts. As Rogoff puts it:
No one wants to relive the anti-inflation fights of the 1980s and 1990s. […] But this problem is easily negotiated. With good communication policy, inflation expectations can be contained, and inflation can be brought down as quickly as necessary ("Inflation" 1-2).
Bibliography
Aizenman, Joshua, and Marion, Nancy. "Using Inflation to Erode the U.S. Public Debt." Working paper. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2009. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
Erosa, Andres, and Ventura, Gustavo. "On Inflation as a Regressive Consumption Tax." Working paper. University of Western Ontario, 2003. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
Federal Open Market Committee. Untitled press release, 16 Mar. 2010. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
Federal Reserve. "The Federal Reserve's Response to the Crisis." Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System official site, last updated 5 Feb. 2010. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. "Series MZM, MZM Money Stock." Last updated 15 Mar. 2010. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
Neumann, Manfred J.M. "Seigniorage in the United States: How Much Does the U.S. Government Make from Money Production?" Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 26.3 (1992): 29-40. Web. 30 Mar. 2010
Reinhart, Carmen M., and Rogoff, Kenneth S. "Growth in a Time of Debt." Working paper. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
Rogoff, Kenneth. "Inflation is Now the Lesser Evil." Syndicated blog post. Cambridge, MA, 2008. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
Rogoff, Kenneth. "From Financial Crisis to Debt Crisis?" Syndicated blog post. Cambridge, MA, 2009. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
Svensson, Lars E.O. "Monetary Policy with a Zero Interest Rate." Policy speech. SNS Centre for Business and Policy Studies, Stockholm, 2009. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing. "Annual Production Figures." U.S. Department of the Treasury official site, 2009. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
U.S. Financial Management Service. "Monthly Treasury Statement." U.S. Department of the Treasury official site, 2010. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
U.S. Senate Banking Committee. "Citizen's Guide to Dollarization." Committee Documents Online: 106th Congress, 2000. Web. 30 Mar. 2010 .
White House Office of Management and Budget. Historical Tables Budget of the U.S. Government: Fiscal Year 2011. Washington, DC: 2010. Web. 30 Mar. 2010
Money Supply 2005-10
Trillions
Sheet1
FRED Graph Observations
Federal Reserve Economic...
Louis
MZM MZM Money Stock (MZM), Billions of Dollars, Weekly, Seasonally Adjusted
Frequency: Weekly, Ending Monday
observation_date MZM
2005-03-21 6.00 6.0-2.75%
2005-03-28 6.00 6.0
2005-04-04 6.00 6.0
2005-04-11 6.00 6.0
2005-04-18 6.00 6.0
2005-04-25 6.00 6.0
2005-05-02 6.00 6.0-3%
2005-05-09 6.00 6.0
2005-05-16 6.00 6.0
2005-05-23 6.00 6.0
2005-05-30 6.00 6.0
2005-06-06 6.00 6.0
2005-06-13 6.00 6.0
2005-06-20 6.00 6.0
2005-06-27 6.00 6.0-3.25%
2005-07-04 6.00 6.0
2005-07-11 6.00 6.0
2005-07-18 6.00 6.0
2005-07-25 6.00 6.0
2005-08-01 6.00 6.0
2005-08-08 6.00 6.0-3.50%
2005-08-15 6.00 6.0
2005-08-22 6.00 6.0
2005-08-29 6.00 6.0
2005-09-05 6.00 6.0
2005-09-12 6.00 6.0
2005-09-19 6.00 6.0-3.75%
2005-09-26 6.00 6.0
2005-10-03 6.00 6.0
2005-10-10 6.00 6.0
2005-10-17 6.00 6.0
2005-10-24 6.00 6.0
2005-10-31 6.00 6.0-4%
2005-11-07 6.00 6.0
2005-11-14 6.00 6.0
2005-11-21 6.00 6.0
2005-11-28 6.00 6.0
2005-12-05 6.00 6.0
2005-12-12 6.00 6.0-4.25%
2005-12-19 6.00 6.0
2005-12-26 6.00 6.0
2006-01-02 6.88 6877.1
2006-01-09 6.89 6886.3
2006-01-16 6.87 6874.6
2006-01-23 6.88 6877.2
2006-01-30 6.86 6862.5-4.50%
2006-02-06 6.87 6874.1
2006-02-13 6.87 6867.0
2006-02-20 6.89 6892.1
2006-02-27 6.91 6912.9
2006-03-06 6.91 6905.0
2006-03-13 6.88 6882.1
2006-03-20 6.88 6877.5
2006-03-27 6.89 6893.8-4.75%
2006-04-03 6.90 6900.7
2006-04-10 6.90 6900.1
2006-04-17 6.91 6905.7
2006-04-24 6.92 6921.6
2006-05-01 6.92 6918.4
2006-05-08 6.91 6909.2-5%
2006-05-15 6.92 6922.2
2006-05-22 6.93 6929.3
2006-05-29 6.93 6934.5
2006-06-05 6.92 6923.8
2006-06-12 6.94 6941.4
2006-06-19 6.96 6964.4
2006-06-26 6.99 6986.0-5.25%
2006-07-03 6.98 6977.3
2006-07-10 7.00 6995.7
2006-07-17 6.99 6993.1
2006-07-24 6.99 6994.2
2006-07-31 6.98 6983.7
2006-08-07 7.00 7000.9
2006-08-14 7.00 7001.7
2006-08-21 7.03 7025.7
2006-08-28 7.03 7026.0
2006-09-04 7.03 7028.3
2006-09-11 7.03 7032.2
2006-09-18 7.04 7039.6
2006-09-25 7.05 7052.9
2006-10-02 7.07 7066.7
2006-10-09 7.10 7100.9
2006-10-16 7.11 7113.4
2006-10-23 7.12 7118.3
2006-10-30 7.11 7110.1
2006-11-06 7.13 7133.0
2006-11-13 7.13 7132.6
2006-11-20 7.15 7151.2
2006-11-27 7.18 7181.1
2006-12-04 7.19 7193.5
2006-12-11 7.20 7201.9
2006-12-18 7.23 7227.8
2006-12-25 7.26 7260.1
2007-01-01 7.27 7274.3
2007-01-08 7.27 7273.2
2007-01-15 7.25 7254.3
2007-01-22 7.24 7239.0
2007-01-29 7.24 7241.9
2007-02-05 7.24 7236.1
2007-02-12 7.26 7259.5
2007-02-19 7.28 7278.6
2007-02-26 7.30 7304.7
2007-03-05 7.28 7283.9
2007-03-12 7.30 7300.3
2007-03-19 7.31 7311.5
2007-03-26 7.35 7350.7
2007-04-02 7.37 7366.1
2007-04-09 7.38 7377.4
2007-04-16 7.40 7397.2
2007-04-23 7.41 7408.3
2007-04-30 7.41 7411.0
2007-05-07 7.44 7444.8
2007-05-14 7.45 7453.2
2007-05-21 7.47 7473.0
2007-05-28 7.48 7475.7
2007-06-04 7.47 7473.4
2007-06-11 7.50 7495.3
2007-06-18 7.51 7512.4
2007-06-25 7.54 7535.5
2007-07-02 7.57 7568.0
2007-07-09 7.57 7574.9
2007-07-16 7.59 7594.5
2007-07-23 7.60 7595.8
2007-07-30 7.61 7611.1
2007-08-06 7.63 7630.3
2007-08-13 7.67 7672.7
2007-08-20 7.74 7738.8
2007-08-27 7.81 7813.5
2007-09-03 7.79 7794.8
2007-09-10 7.82 7821.8
2007-09-17 7.85 7851.9-4.75%
2007-09-24 7.87 7868.3
2007-10-01 7.92 7923.0
2007-10-08 7.95 7952.7
2007-10-15 7.94 7939.5
2007-10-22 7.96 7962.8
2007-10-29 8.04 8036.3-4.50%
2007-11-05 8.01 8010.9
2007-11-12 8.05 8052.8
2007-11-19 8.08 8080.3
2007-11-26 8.10 8101.6
2007-12-03 8.12 8116.0
2007-12-10 8.15 8148.6
2007-12-17 8.15 8146.5
2007-12-24 8.16 8160.5
2007-12-31 8.16 8162.6
2008-01-07 8.16 8157.8
2008-01-14 8.15 8145.3
2008-01-21 8.17 8173.6-3.50%
2008-01-28 8.25 8250.0-3%
2008-02-04 8.33 8325.6
2008-02-11 8.37 8370.3
2008-02-18 8.41 8406.7
2008-02-25 8.44 8439.7
2008-03-03 8.48 8482.8
2008-03-10 8.51 8507.2
2008-03-17 8.53 8532.0-2.25%
2008-03-24 8.56 8557.9
2008-03-31 8.59 8594.3
2008-04-07 8.61 8607.2
2008-04-14 8.61 8606.4
2008-04-21 8.62 8621.4
2008-04-28 8.61 8611.7-2%
2008-05-05 8.59 8590.3
2008-05-12 8.64 8635.4
2008-05-19 8.67 8674.1
2008-05-26 8.70 8699.3
2008-06-02 8.71 8711.0
2008-06-09 8.71 8708.7
2008-06-16 8.70 8699.8
2008-06-23 8.71 8714.9
2008-06-30 8.71 8710.8
2008-07-07 8.75 8745.0
2008-07-14 8.77 8773.2
2008-07-21 8.79 8787.3
2008-07-28 8.77 8767.0
2008-08-04 8.76 8760.5
2008-08-11 8.76 8756.7
2008-08-18 8.75 8748.2
2008-08-25 8.74 8741.6
2008-09-01 8.76 8757.3
2008-09-08 8.77 8769.9
2008-09-15 8.76 8760.0
2008-09-22 8.83 8832.5
2008-09-29 8.84 8835.4
2008-10-06 8.78 8783.6-1.50%
2008-10-13 8.81 8810.8
2008-10-20 8.88 8882.8
2008-10-27 8.87 8867.0-1%
2008-11-03 8.89 8890.9
2008-11-10 8.91 8913.5
2008-11-17 8.95 8946.1
2008-11-24 9.00 8998.0
2008-12-01 9.07 9072.1
2008-12-08 9.13 9131.2
2008-12-15 9.17 9170.6-0%
2008-12-22 9.22 9218.6
2008-12-29 9.26 9258.3
2009-01-05 9.32 9319.2
2009-01-12 9.30…
MZM Money Supply 2005-10
Trillions
Other monetary policies that can affect the automotive industry in the U.S. include mandated price ceilings on the price of gasoline (Mankiw, 2004). These approaches, though, have not proven particularly effective in the past and created more problems than they solved. In this regard, this author also emphasizes that, "Eventually, the laws regulating the price of gasoline were repealed. Lawmakers came to understand that they were partly responsible for the
Many young people voted for Reagan as he represented rebellion against the authority figures in society but was a rebellion characterized by valiance and effectuated through skillful communication. The approval rating of Reagan was approximately 42% when 1982 began but dropped to the record low 35% later that same year. The U.S. entered a recession. If one is to set their focus upon obtaining a chance at being the
He also related how his small group of friends played tricks with their unwitting neighbors. His friends would set fire on alcohol, rekindled candles blown out, imitate lightning flashes or by touching or kissing and make an artificial spider move (Bellis). Using the Leyden jar, Benjamin made an electrical batter, roasted a fowl on a spit fired with electricity, ignited alcohol by electricity through water, fired gunpowder and shocked wine
Amazon Web Services’ Expansion to Russia and Mexico Executive Summary While globalization has posed numerous potential opportunities and threats in the international business arena, many of these opportunities and threats are specific to individual countries (Zhuplev, 2016). Therefore, a country risk analysis becomes a crucial element to consider for companies doing business on the international scale. In this view, country risk analysis has been the subject of extensive research in recent times
76). As automation increasingly assumes the more mundane and routine aspects of work of all types, Drucker was visionary in his assessment of how decisions would be made in the years to come. "In the future," said Drucker, "it was possible that all employment would be managerial in nature, and we would then have progressed from a society of labor to a society of management" (Witzel, p. 76). The
According to the authors, this can be done if employees are given a sense of importance in the organizations. Knowledge workers are already short in supplies and most competing rivals also compete to get the best human resource in terms of knowledge workers. It is therefore essential for any organization to retain this highly skilled part of their workforce and in order to do that organizations must eliminate the
