Negative Liberty Not Always Justified Research Paper

Civil Liberties vs. Government The role of government in regulating the behaviors and activities of certain people and/or in certain situations is not generally questioned by most people. On the same note, the right of people to generally live their lives and be left alone is also presumed to be true in many to most cases. However, those two paradigms inevitably collide because they cannot both be true at the same time in all situations. There are situations where government should or must step in just as there are situations where they should leave people alone and let them live how they wish. The million dollar question is where that line precisely exists in certain situations because it can be far from clear what that answer is.

Analysis

One source that the author of this report focused on was the definition of positive and negative liberty. The latter one, that being negative, is a focus on not being "harassed" or harangued by the government about one thing or another. Whlie that may be a noble thing to demand in many instances, government does indeed exist for a reason and there are certain situations where they can and should intercede...

...

For example, the author of this report would hold that a government giving a seven-year-old static for operating a lemonade stand without a business license is more than excessive, the same is not true is a child is not going to school as they should be or there are signs of abuse such as marks, malnourishment and so forth. There could be innocent reasons for any of those things but there could also be more insidious ones. Perhaps the parent of a child with marks just has a clumsy child or perhaps they just need some assistance from the food pantry. That is what social services are for and it could be the pride is preventing them from getting the assistance they need. However, if the parents are actively abusing the child and/or not feeding them what they should even though they have the resources, that is another matter entirely. In those cases, negative liberty goes out the window and the interests and safety of the child usurp all notions of liberty relating to the parent who is failing the child (Carter, 2012).
However, there are some areas that are much grayer than the one above. For example, the targeted killing of terrorists…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Alexander, J., & Richmond, S.A. (2007). Administrative discretion: Can we move beyond cider house rules? The American Review of Public Administration, 37(1),

51 -- 64. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Carter, I. (2012). Positive and negative liberty. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford

Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/liberty-positive-negative/


Cite this Document:

"Negative Liberty Not Always Justified" (2015, August 05) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/negative-liberty-not-always-justified-2152851

"Negative Liberty Not Always Justified" 05 August 2015. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/negative-liberty-not-always-justified-2152851>

"Negative Liberty Not Always Justified", 05 August 2015, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/negative-liberty-not-always-justified-2152851

Related Documents

Political Philosophy II: Theories of Freedom John Stuart Mill's On Liberty is one of the foundational defenses of liberal, democratic government. According to Mill, there are certain core principles "that should regulate how governments and societies, whether democratic or not, can restrict individual liberties."[footnoteRef:1] Mill wrote that regardless of whether a monarch, dictator, or even a democratic majority governed, the only reason to deprive others of their liberties was what he

Protectionism and Free Trade Principles of Economics: A Discussion on Protectionism and Trade Liberalization In the convoluted world of discussion over the future of developing countries, rich nations seem to make all the decisions, regardless of whether they benefit or harm the former group, or so it seems. This supposition is debated heatedly by those concerned and by external actors, especially when it comes to deciding whether trade liberalization is the right modality

Birth Control Ethics The author of this report has been asked to consider the ethical dilemma of whether businesses and organizations should be required as a matter law to offer certain birth control options as part of the health insurance offerings given by the organization. For many publicly traded and diverse organizations, there is not really a question involved and compliance is pretty automatic. However, organizations that are privately held and/or

Buy and Sell Organs for Transplants: The consideration of the possible negative socio-ethical repercussions of allowing people to buy and sell their non-vital body organs for transplant fortifies the argument of all opponents to the proposition. As stated in the U.S. Constitution, human beings are created equal and given the un-separable rights to life, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness. While in the pursuit of these rights, the American society has

It must be considered, as well, that genetic testing is a somewhat newer thing and the results can be skewed; so even if a doctor did do a test and results came up negative, there is a chance something could have been positive. Is the doctor responsible for the fact that the test didn't find any genetic problems? It would be absolutely nonsensical to think that the doctor should be

9/11 Impacts Events of 911 were a shock not only for the people of America but for the entire world. These events brought drastic changes in the world economy along with the political and sociological changes. Different people have different views about the impacts of 9/11 and the way it has changed the world. In order to do this paper, I interviewed my uncle and a neighbor friend. My uncle who