Organization Models Within The Correctional System There Term Paper

Organization Models Within the correctional system there are three different organization models which apply and are used in administrative and management purposes. These models include the authoritarian model, bureaucratic model and participative model. The paper will give a description of each of these three models as they apply to the correctional environments. It will also discuss the intended goals of the correctional administrations that utilize these models and the specific time period the models were developed as well as finding out if these models were effective during the period which they were developed. The information the paper will give the foundation of the correctional systems as well as the models that are found within in and if these models are still in effect now. The operations of a correctional facility are under these models in order to provide the in mates with a particular type of security and care. With these models in place in a correctional facility their operations are different depending on the specific type of model that is being used. The advantages and disadvantages of these models also vary and hence have to be looked into since they have become the reason as to why the models are used within particular correctional systems.

Each and every facility is different, therefore, this means that they can not all use the same model. They have to use a model that best fits the correctional environment and will be beneficial to them .This will therefore lead to the discussion on what model is the most efficient one in a correctional setting as well as examples of these models that are used in the correctional systems.

Authoritarian model

The Authoritarian models are those that make all decisions regardless of the input of other members. They are an authoritative figure hence dictate directions to other people at the same time leaving them in the dark regarding any future intentions or plans. This is usually characterized by presence of strong leaders, prison...

...

This model in correctional systems was very prevalent in the United States as from the colonial period up until the 1900's.this style is highly centralized that it creates a regimented environment that has a consistent application of rules that are meant for all people. It funnels the entire process of making decisions to the central power figure even if some of the decisions are better of made at a lower level.in this model other staff are denied the experience of making decisions and lead to the creation of an arbitrary and capricious system which is prone to corruption ( Carlson, Garret,.&Christopher,2010).
Bureaucratic model

This model revolves around a strict and hierarchical system however it is not focusses entirely on one particular dominating authority. Flows in the organization are controlled through the hierarchy with a very strict chain of command as well as a formal communication process. The rules and regulations meant for the correctional environment are precisely written down. Within the facility there are clear set of standards and procedures in place ( Salinas, 2009). The practical benefit attached to this model is that the correctional system does not entirely depend on one or two individuals and therefore there can be an easy promotion or substitution of personnel.at the same time the policy parameters that are emphasized within this management structure are quite clear for all parties meaning that the staff are help accountable if they do not comply with the expectations that have been written down.one negative side of this model is that written rules are not a guarantee that there will be consistent enforcement and hence they are not helpful in each and every situation that presents itself within the system. Bureaucratic processes are often quite slow in their response to change and hence…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Baunach, PJ.(1981). Participatory Management - Restructuring the Prison Environment. Retrieved February 18, 2014 from https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=76572

Lancefield, K, Lennings, C, J. & Thomson, D. (1997).Management style and its effect on prison officers' stress. Retrieved February 18,2014 from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02765325

Carlson P.M,, Garret S, J. & Christopher.(2010). Prison and Jail Administration: Practice and Theory.pg 272.Retrieved February 18,2014 from http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=hW0rAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA272&lpg=PA272&dq=Participative+model+in+correctional+environments&source=bl&ots=BhslBxRktE&sig=-B5MbbBXyE1YRWJnSYf3T2IPuPk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=fkwDU_zuKc-p0AWd64GADw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Participative%20model%20in%20correctional%20environments&f=false

The sanctuary model.(2010).Authoritarianism. Retrieved February 18,2014 from http://www.sanctuaryweb.com/authoritarianism.php
Salinas, G, L.(2009).A preliminary Analysis:Prison models and prison management models and the Texas prison system. Retrieved February 18,2014 from https://digital.library.txstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10877/3639/fulltext.pdf?sequence=1
Lerch J., Viglione J,. Eley, E., Andrews S,&Taxman, F.(2009). Organizational Readiness in Corrections. Retrieved February 18, 2014 from http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/federalcourts/pps/fedprob/2011-06/02_organizational.html


Cite this Document:

"Organization Models Within The Correctional System There" (2014, February 18) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/organization-models-within-the-correctional-183049

"Organization Models Within The Correctional System There" 18 February 2014. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/organization-models-within-the-correctional-183049>

"Organization Models Within The Correctional System There", 18 February 2014, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/organization-models-within-the-correctional-183049

Related Documents

Japanese Correctional System as Compared to the American Corrections System The Japanese correctional system places a strong emphasis on rehabilitation and preparing the prisoner for being released once again into society. The Japanese correctional system "is intended to resocialize, reform, and rehabilitate offenders" rather than enforce a system of retributive justice along the lines of the American model (Coutsoukis, 2004). This is why most sociologists state that the restorative philosophy of

Punishment in the U.S. Correctional System IN ITS RIGHTFUL PLACE AND FORM Punishment in the U.S. Corrections System Objectives of Punishment These are to punish the offender, to protect the population from him or her, and to rehabilitate him or her (eNotes, 2013; Law Link, 2003). The first goal of punishment is theoretically intended to discourage or deter a repeat of the offense and a demonstration of why it should be avoided. The most

prison system. This discussion is carried out in line with the observed cases of ethical, legal, and standards of practice considerations.The other issues addressed are the social and cultural composition of the population served and culturally sensitive practices, a theoretical framework that reflects the professional ethical codes of your field. Issues of informed consent and acknowledgement of client and patient rights, strategies to ensure confidentiality and potential problems that

Prison The modern prison system represents a macrocosmic understanding of how to punish the collective sins of society. Within any environment, the strength of its contents is a direct reflection on the worst of its contents as well. The importance of the cathartic rehabilitation that occurs during learning, growth, understanding and forgiveness dictates how one would be rehabilitated in any system, prison or not. The sheer numbers of prisoners within the

The result is that employees at all levels for their own protection as well as to create a system of mutial support among leaders and subordinates have begun to demand collaborative rights of communication and input on job design, and leadership practices. Empowerment of employees has long been shown to be a positive aspect of individual employee motivation as well as the desire to be a part of a

The courts retooled by a generation of conservative judicial appointments and crazed case law now function as social abettors, in which the poor and the dark skinned are shunted off to a concrete hell with industrial efficiency. Left behind are broken families, more addiction, more disease, more illiteracy, and thus a more docile society" (Parenti, 2001). There are different changes being made in the system to reflect new and evolving