Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Post #1 Critique
In looking at the first post, there are a few concerns and things that perhaps were not fully addressed. First up is whether the variables were identified. Of course, the main variable under consideration is the alarms and the scheduling/setting thereof. There are mentions of the alarms and how they figure into the research but there is not really any explicit mention of the type of variable in question when speaking of the alarms. The closest that the response comes is the response to part 2. As for whether the tool itself was covered, that was actually done quite well. This was greatly covered in the first answer and it is the first thing mentioned within the same. When it comes to whether the way the tools were described were good, that was done fairly well. There is the expected and proper talk of reliability and validity. Those are hallmarks of any good research, of course. Question three and the answer to the same does a good job of showing who did the research. Per the answer, the answers and details were collected by research assistants. One thing that was identified and that stood out is that the RA's were not trained...
This is a little concerning but it is wise for the initial respondent to point that out. A key part of analyzing this research response is the talk about how using RA's was actually wise versus that of nurses because of how the latter might "assume" things. The author of this response disagrees with that and asserts that whomever is doing the data collection, whomever they are, should not assume anything and should be clinically trained. As such, the respondent is really only half right in respect to the wisdom of using RA's such as they were. The associations and conclusions that can be made from all of this would include the fact of whether the data was properly collected, whether the questions were asked in the right way, whether the RA's were trained in the right manner to keep the data pure and relevant and so forth. Using data collection tools and research are not rocket science, so to speak, but non-medical researchers doing medical research is a bit concerning to say the least (Cucolo & Perroca, 2006).
Post #2 Critique
This response does a very good job of identifying the variables. It is one of…
References
Cucolo, D. F., & Perroca, M. G. (2017). Assessment of the nursing care product (APROCENF):
a reliability and construct validity study. Revista Latino-Americana De
Enfermagem, 25e2860. doi:10.1590/1518-8345.1495.2860
Stevanin, S., Bressan, V., Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K., Pagani, L., Poletti, P., & Kvist, T. (2017).
PubMed search terms used to initially identify a qualitative study were the following: nursing qualitative. A large number of citations were retrieved, but the selection was further limited by only those available as free full-text articles through PubMed Central. This provided some idea of what is available and after skimming down the citations the topic of tuberculosis treatment compliance was chosen. The search terms used next were the following:
The personal impact of violent scenes is important and is one of the main reasons for which films are made, to create an impression and an impact on the human mind. So, the argument is rather well placed. At the same time though, I think it would have been even more compelling if there would have been some references made to studies conducted in this area such as psychological
However, by using peer-reviewed journals, there is a far greater likelihood that the information will have value. References Moolenaar, D.E., & G. (2009). Modelling criminal justice system costs by offence. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(4), 309-326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10610-009-9110-2 Zalman, M. (2007). The search for criminal justice theory: Reflections on Kraska's theorizing criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18(1), 163-181,186. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/223393722?accountid=14872 ABSTRACT: This paper illustrates how to estimate
databases CSU Online Library, source peer-reviewed articles. The purpose assignment practice reviewing articles contribute industry. The authors articles researchers professionals shared BFS 3460, Fire Protection Systems 3 experimented ideas demonstrate potential improve industry. Matthew S. Connolly, Stephen M. Jaskolka, Jeffrey S. Rosen, and Michael D. Szkutak's article "ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE OF WATER MIST FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS WITH ANTIFREEZE" provides an intriguing view with regard to the importance of providing solutions to
Nursing Instructions: Please use peer reviewed articles for references. References must be in 6th edition APA format The instructor changed the first part of assignment. Pick one genetic disease, Downs syndrome or Huntingtons disease are good choices. List typical symptoms, clinical manefestations and what specific nursing intervnetions are required for this type patient. I won't need the normal genetic inheritence or abnormal genetic inheritance or fluid and electrolyte balance in the body. Please
Scholars must use reliable information to build new conclusions and arguments of their own. If the information they use to build an argument is in any way flawed or unreliable, their entire conclusion can thus be in jeopardy. As such, one way to ensure that the information a scholar compiles is valid enough is to use peer reviewed articles from reliable academic journals. Peer reviewed articles have the their