Penn Tax Memo Tuition Tax Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
565
Cite

In addition, the estimation of seventy-seven thousand individuals that would be able to receive an additional refund from the tax credit suggests that it could actually cost the state a substantial amount of money to operate this program. These students would not only pay no taxes, but would actually receive money from the state -- a minimally employed student that owed no income tax to begin with could actually receive a refund of eight hundred dollars (forty percent of two-thousand) or more. Clearly, there would be a major impact o the overall state budget from the cost of this program. Though a billion dollars doesn't go as far as it used to, it is still a substantial portion of the state's total sixty-three billion dollar budget (POB, 2012). Though the money saved or sent out to individual taxpayers through this tax credit would most likely be used to make purchases...

...

Careful consideration of these factors should be undertaken before any decision regarding the tax credit is made; while benefiting Pennsylvania's college university students today, it could significantly impair the state's long-term viability.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

PASDC. (2012). Quick facts. Pennsylvania State Data Center. Accessed 3 March 2012. http://pasdc.hbg.psu.edu/sdc/pasdc_files/pastats/PaFacts_2011.pdf

POB. (2012). Budget in Brief. Pennsylvania Office of the Budget. Accessed 3 March 2012. http://www.budget.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/current_and_proposed_commonwealth_budgets/4566


Cite this Document:

"Penn Tax Memo Tuition Tax" (2012, March 03) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/penn-tax-memo-tuition-tax-54732

"Penn Tax Memo Tuition Tax" 03 March 2012. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/penn-tax-memo-tuition-tax-54732>

"Penn Tax Memo Tuition Tax", 03 March 2012, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/penn-tax-memo-tuition-tax-54732

Related Documents

Taxes Why does income tax penalize savers but consumption tax would not? Consumption tax differs from income tax in that it allows taxpayers to deduct any savings they may have from their overall income prior to calculating their taxes (p.644). This type of taxation has become increasingly advocated due to widespread low savings among people in the United States and long-term negative effects this may have on the economy (p.644). With a

However, a related New York Times article on the story reported: "In court papers, the I.R.S. said that First Data had actively marketed and sold offshore services to American merchants, typically investment and Internet-commerce advisory shops, who in turn used the service to help their clients hide taxable income…In 2002, the unit [Cardservice International and now called First Data Independent Sales] which works with 3,200 independent sales offices and

S. domestic law, a U.S. citizen or resident (Non U.S. person) who is a beneficiary of a foreign retirement plan would be subjected to the existing U.S. income taxation on all of the income that is accrued in their foreign investment plans even though their income is never currently distributed per se to the beneficiary. This should be the case unless the foreign retirement plan accounts as the employee's trust

The state of Pennsylvania also levies additional taxes on its citizens. Taxes are levied not only for individuals, but also for businesses. Taxes are levied differently for incorporated and non-incorporated businesses. Incorproated businesses are considered an independent entity and is therefor taxed independent of its owners. This is commonly referred to as double taxation meaning the owner of the corporation must pay taxes twice, once on the salary derived from

Later, however Democratic leaders approved a bipartisan plan, minus the homestead tax increase. ("State income tax unthinkable," 2007) Income Tax Proponents, Opponents and Components Income tax proponents argue that even with Florida's exemptions for food and medicine, poorer people pay a higher percentage of their income in the form of sales tax than wealthier citizens. They argue that an income tax would prove to be fairer as sales tax is

UK Government Restore the 50% Additional Rate of Income Tax? The United Kingdom has developed to become one the highest taxed nations across the globe despite impaired competitiveness and stifled economic growth. Unlike most OECD countries that have lessened their tax burdens since 1997, UK taxation has increased, which has resulted in reduced competitiveness of the country's position as a low tax regime. The other characteristics of UK taxation include