Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
In his model, Plato is therefore unjust.
Just as his social and political arrangement of a city is inappropriate for humans, so too is his argument for the humans in that political and social arrangement. Most of his arguments for the individuals in this society can be found in his fifth book. While be first begins with the argument that men and women should be treated equally in education, occupation, and war -- a modern idea -- this furthers his unjust expectations of humans. It is an attempt to further dehumanize the humans that live in his society by refusing to acknowledge their emotional and human characteristics by acknowledging, instead, the characteristics that can be used to make use of them in society. In an even greater assault of these human ideas, Plato states that the wives of guardians will be chosen for them, as well as wondering how "marriages can be made most beneficial" (Plato Book V). In addition to this, Plato suggests that the sexual practices of the citizens be monitored in order to allow for the best offspring possible. Plato argues that "the best of either sex should be united with the best as often, and the inferior with the inferior, as seldom...
Now these goings on must be a secret which the rulers only know, or there will be a further danger of our herd, as the guardians may be termed, breaking out into rebellion" (Book V).
Thus, it is obvious that Plato's recommendations for individuals in his society are as extreme as his structuring of that society itself. While this may be just if just as defined as keeping citizens safe and making sure that the "best" of society is preserved, it relieves humanity of their art and their humanness. In both Plato's political and social structure, as well as his recommendations for individuals in that society, then, Plato presents an injustice -- bringing readers right back to the question posed at the beginning of The Republic: What is justice? What is the benefit of justice?
Works Cited
Brown, Eric. "Plato's Ethics and Politics in The Republic." 1 April 2003. 19 May 2009.
Plato. "The Republic." Trans. Benjamin Jowett. The Internet Classics Archive. 2009.
MIT. 19 May 2009.
Works Cited
Brown, Eric. "Plato's Ethics and Politics in The Republic." 1 April 2003. 19 May 2009.
<http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-ethics-politics/#2>
Plato. "The Republic." Trans. Benjamin Jowett. The Internet Classics Archive. 2009.
MIT. 19 May 2009. <http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.html>
Plato's Republic And Justice Justice is ultimately an unknowable concept, if we accept Plato's ideas of 'form' or the essential nature of concepts. In the Republic, Plato presents several intelligent and well-thought-out discussions about the nature of justice. He refutes the arguments that justice is simply rewarding friends, or asserting the interests of the strong. He ultimately concludes that the goal of life is the pursuit of what is just, and
Plato and Descartes Plato concept of innate goodness and Descartes descriptions of human reasoning for being good both provide a foundation for man's need to better understand the basic and spiritual goodness found within human nature. In Plato's Republic, he provides many anthologies that help one to discover their own goodness. Descartes gives many logical reasons within his work, Meditations, that help to explain why the human mind reflects God's natural
This is Aristotle's launching pad for his discussion of politics. To him, ethics and politics are matters of rational judgment, stemming from the natural inclinations of individual humans. This notion is reflected in Aristotle's analysis of the constitutional doctrines of some 158 cities. Essentially, he recognized that every state -- necessarily city states -- exist in unique sets of circumstances that act upon the universal forms of ethics in ways
The issue of justice is also very closely related to that of morality. In the Republic, morality is again a function of the class division dictated by soul dominance. With every individual's place in society rigidly defined, social interaction were also defined. There would be a prescribed way of dealing with someone lese based on which class each member was, and since most immoral behavior has some form of jealousy
Plato's Republic In ancient Greece, there were a number of ideas that were considered to be some of the most desirable attributes in society. In Plato's Republic these ideas are taken in different directions with a critical inward look at humanity and what characteristics need to be embraced. One of the better areas where this is discussed is through Glaucon's arguments about justice. To fully understand these ideas requires explaining
Philosophy In Book I of Plato's Republic, Thrasymachus, Glaucon, and Adeimantus provide intellectual foils for Socrates's ethical philosophy. Socrates responds to Thrasymachus's stance, which is essentially that, "the life of an unjust person is better than that of a just one," (p 88; 347e). Thrasymachus goes so far as to state that justice is "noble naivete," and therefore not worth pursuing at all (348c). Glaucon immediately takes the side of Thrasymachus,