Politics Can Be Defined Both

¶ … Politics can be defined both as "the art or science concerned with winning and holding control over a government" and as "the process by which groups of people make decisions." If we look at the first definition of politics, it is not a positive one for its applicability within an organization.

Indeed, that type of definition emphasizes the conflicting characteristics of politics as a science or art: the necessity to fight over power, the strategies and tactics that need to be applied so as to remain in power and the relationships that need to be formed in this sense. It virtually presents the scenario where the organization is a battlefield between different factions who are fighting for power within the company.

On the other hand, the second definition has a positive nuance to it, because it emphasizes the fact that politics is about decision making and the decision making process. This means that politics is about working together with your colleagues, about interacting with them in order to reach an appropriate decision for the benefit of the organization and its shareholders.

From this perspective, we can indeed support the idea that politics is not inherently bad and that it is, in fact, a logical element of the decision making process without which a democratic solution cannot be reached. Politics implies, from this point-of-view, the idea that all important factors of decision within the organization are consulted before a mutually consented decision is reached. This supports the idea that politics encourages not only a democratic framework, but also widespread consultations with all departments that might be affected by the decision.

This means that the decision is made in the mutual interest of all the departments involved. 2. First of all, workforce diversity implies different cultural backgrounds that encourage different approaches in tackling problems and issues that might arise in the organizational workplace. This means that people are likely to come up with different solutions for different problems and this can stimulate an intellectual emulation that can only be beneficial for the organizational mechanisms.

On the other hand, diversity also implies an academic diversity, meaning that organizations in general will not promote only a certain type of individual (MBA, business-oriented etc.), but will also include individuals with different academic profiles. Again, this is beneficial towards the methodologies of tackling different work-related issues. On the other hand, diversity will also stimulate the personnel from the perspective of intellectuals who enjoy working in a diverse, stimulating environment.

Diversity implies a cultural multilateralism in the office that can only create a motivating workplace, a workplace where the individual likes to go and exchange ideas. Following Maslow's pyramid, this is also the kind of environment where the individual strives to obtain social recognition and to gain a social status. A diverse workplace is likely to motivate him in this direction and to create the appropriate premises for his individual personality. Finally, a diverse workplace is obviously fun and the organization, as well as the team can.