Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Rationalizing
In The Augean Stables, Poirot takes some dramatic action to discredit the X-Ray News. He rationalizes the actions based on two main considerations. One is the outcome of the event and the other is the fact that Percy Perry, the editor of the X-Ray News is a blackmailer. Even though the information that Perry had was the truth, and it was damaging, Poirot rationalized his actions based on the utilitarian virtue of the greatest good for the greatest number. Ferrier was known to be a good man while his opponent in this situation, Perry, was not. Actions that Perry was to undertake to reveal the scandal would have been good for Perry and for the potentially-dictatorial opposition party, but they would not have been good for Britain as a whole. Thus, the majority of the nation benefits from having the truth obfuscated.
There is an element of Kantian thought to Poirot's actions as well, because of the character of Percy Perry. Poirot justified his actions in part by rationalizing that a bad person deserves a bad outcome. This colors his actions as well -- had Perry been an upstanding journalist then perhaps Poirot would not have felt so justified in his actions against Perry. If, however, the character of the actors in question had been removed from consideration, then it seems evident that Poirot's actions would have been more difficult to justify.
The detective, then, was working within the confines of ethical philosophy that supported the decision he had already chosen. He chose to participate because of his own personal loyalties, and only applied the utilitarian justification after the fact. This shows that while we inherently consider consistency in ethical philosophy to be a virtue, in many instances people will rationalize their actions after the fact, taking advantage of the wide range of potential ethical philosophies at their disposal. Poirot only took a utilitarian viewpoint because it supported his actions.
Virtue Ethics: The Good and the Bad About Virtue Ethics The philosophy of virtue ethics holds that being a 'good person' or what one might call 'character' is the most important determinant of moral action. Virtue ethics is considered to be one of the major philosophical orientations in the field of normative ethics, along with consequentialism and deontology (Hursthouse 2010). Many consider it to be the oldest form of ethics, harkening
Virtue Ethics Virtue-based vs. duty-based ethics: arguments and examples from Victor Hugo, Aristotle, Bernard Mayo, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and William Frankena In the study of ethics and morality, there have been theoretical foundations in which it was argued that morality comes with being rather than doing, or that a true moral life is one that is a product of doing instead of being. Or, oftentimes, theoreticians and philosophers contend that morality must bear
Virtue Ethics and reasoning for the scenario Virtue ethics is the ethical strategy preferred. Efficient leaders and true professionals strive at achieving moral excellence which encompasses integrity, justice, valor and good sense. In the present day, virtue ethics constitutes one among the three key normative ethics strategies. Primarily, it can be considered a strategy which stresses moral fiber or virtues, contrary to consequentialism (which focuses on the consequences one’s actions have)
This will allow someone to move beyond the different emotions, so that they can be able to see how the different actions will affect the world around them. Despite some of the obvious weaknesses, you can be able to determine the most appropriate course of action, by asking questions and gaining more information. Once this achieved, you will have a greater sense of enlightenment, because you were able to
The question here arises, why did we have to return to ancient philosophy of virtue ethics? But interestingly while a great deal of credit is given to Aristotle and Plato, the modern moral philosophers such as Anscombe, Foot, Murdoch, Slote had mentioned in very precise terms the problems they found in Aristotelian ethics. They must have absorbed the writings of ancient philosophers since a lot is said about the moral
Deontological ethics are based on other theories that focus on duty and obligation. Immanuel Kant (1785) argued that an individual should "always act in such a way that you can also will that the maxim of your action become universal law" (p. v). It can be argued that Kant's arguments are echoed in a quote often attributed to Ghandi, "Be the change you want to see in the world"