¶ … benefit analysis that typically goes into decisions about sampling in industrial hygiene. The authors describe that there are two different main types of sampling -- active and passive. These come with different advantages and disadvantages, one of which is cost. Some others are the amount of time and effort required, and the accuracy of the sampling technique. The authors focus on the cost. Often, the sampling cost is viewed as an up-front cost, but of course this is not the entire picture -- in many cases discovering and addressing a problem early saves a lot of money. So the full cost-benefit picture needs to be taken into consideration when determining the optimal sampling technique. The authors compared five passive monitors and one active monitor under a number of different scenarios. They found that overall the passive monitors had a better cost-benefit. They were in particular cheaper than the active monitor. The study, however, has an issue in its methodology in that there was only one active monitor type chosen. This means that when the results of the study are viewed honestly, the passive monitors only outperformed one type of active monitor, not the entire class of active monitors, as most types were not tested...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now