Sarbanes-Oxley Examining The Real Cost Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
906
Cite

2009). Engle (2009) also notes that the costs of compliance in both monetary and human terms are greatly reduced by a willingness to embrace the regulation as a tool rather than shunning it as a "necessary evil." Though stating the obvious, he says what many in the business world simply couldn't bring themselves to hear just over a year ago, namely that "smart managers approach compliance before there is a problem that impacts the company and its stakeholders" (Engle 2009, p. 18). The issues at Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers could have been prevented with regulation, but those at Enron and WorldCom were exacerbated by outright fraud, and the regulations provided by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act would have prevented such egregious mistreatment and mis-management of the company and its shareholders.

Strangely, the detection and prevention of fraud is not a benefit often perceived in the regulations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by companies, though the number of corporate executives who do believe the Act is effective in this regard is nearing the fifty-percent mark (FEI 2008). There are other perceived benefits that corporations are reporting alongside their lowered costs of compliance, however; more than half believe that their companies' financial statements have been made more accurate by compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and over two-thirds report that investor confidence has noticeably improved in the period following the Act's implementation (FEI 2008). Though events following...

...

2009; FEI 2008).
This brings us back to the initial question: is the payoff for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance worth the cost? The only simple answer is, it's too earl to tell. Yet the most recent numbers definitely suggest that compliance is not the costly affair it was once thought to be, and confidence in the benefits of the new regulations has increased almost as quickly as costs of keeping up with them have decreased. The recent financial upheaval has made all of this somewhat irrelevant in he immediate future, but when the dust fully settle it is likely that we will see these trends continue. After all, greed and dishonesty could never really be good for business, right?

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Chang, H.; Choy, H.; Cooper, W.; Parker, B. & Ruefli, T. (2009). "Measuring productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes of CPA firms prior to, and following the Sarbanes-Oxley Act." Socio-economic planning sciences 43(4), pp. 221-8.

Engle, P. (2009). "Making compliance effective." Industrial engineer 41(8), p. 8.

FEI. (2008). "FEI Survey: Average 2007 SOX Compliance Cost $1.7 Million." Financial Executives International. Accessed 25 September 2009. http://fei.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=204


Cite this Document:

"Sarbanes-Oxley Examining The Real Cost" (2009, September 25) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sarbanes-oxley-examining-the-real-cost-19162

"Sarbanes-Oxley Examining The Real Cost" 25 September 2009. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sarbanes-oxley-examining-the-real-cost-19162>

"Sarbanes-Oxley Examining The Real Cost", 25 September 2009, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sarbanes-oxley-examining-the-real-cost-19162

Related Documents

The integrity of the financial sector of these organizations controlled by state agencies and related services, would improve. The provisions offered by the act would serve as models based on which standards for other non-profit organizations can be developed in the future. It will create a better understanding of the limitations placed on auditors and a deeper scrutiny of the financial and transaction statements presented by the auditors. While

The investors got intoxicated by fraud happened to them because of greedy people. Thousands of employees left as the stock market went to the peak but most of them left their jobs due to low pay as well. (Kerry Hannon, July 6, 2005) bill was passed by the President Bush after the corporate fraud nearly just after three weeks on April 25, 2002. It referred to the Senate Banking

WorldCom Prior to the corporate financial scandal, WorldCom was one of the largest long distance telephone companies (Reuters, 2003). Initially headquartered in Mississippi it later moved to Virginia. The company grew fast by acquiring other companies such as MCI Communications in 1998 and UUNET technology in 1996. Other companies acquired included, Metromedia in 1992, Resurgens Communications Group in 1993. In the course of this acquisition spree, WorldCom undertook two complex

Improvements in Integrity, Financial Accountability, Ethical Conduct and Corporate Responsibilities under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 We passed Sarbanes-Oxley in the wake of the Enron scandal to try to root out financial and accounting irregularities. How could similar irregularities occur at Lehman Brothers? History has a way of constantly repeating itself. -- Joseph Grant 2010 The high-profile corporate shenanigans by Enron and Lehman Brothers have made it clear that tough legislation was

This process has been ongoing since then. One of the major differences between the two standards is going to be that whereas GAAP emphasizes rules, the IFRS is a principle-based approach. Implementing a principles-based approach has significant implications for American tax practice. Many of the specific differences between the two systems will have a direct impact on tax practice. In IFRS, LIFO is prohibited and inventory write-downs may be reversed

The company showed a global reach early, adding numerous language versions around the world. In 2000, the company reached 18 million search queries per day and officially became the world's largest search engine ("Google, Inc." paras. 11-14). The company now sought to address its need for income by introducing a keyword-targeted advertising program for another source of revenue. The company partnered with Yahoo! And with other partners, such as China's