Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Sartre or Descartes Theory
Descartes' Theory on Mind and Body
Descartes thought that the mind and body were two different substances. He supported that by proclaiming that he could doubt the existence of his body (physical reality), but he could not doubt the existence of himself (Clarke, 2006). He believed that indicated that he was not identical to his body, and that they were two separate things. The reason he could not doubt his existence as a being of some type who could think was due to the fact that the very act of considering the issue meant that he had to be some type of thinking being (Duncan, 2008). The issue here is that Descartes is focused o how the mind and the body have to be two different substances because they are not identical to one another. If they were identical, all of the properties they share would be the same (Duncan, 2008). Since that is the not the case, the mind and body have to be separate things that work together (Duncan, 2008). How they work together is another question with no easy answer, although many things in the world that are different...
The idea that they could do so is realistic (Clarke, 2006).
In Descartes' way of looking at the world, the mind and the body do not have the same properties. The body is something which can be doubted, but the mind cannot be doubted (Clarke, 2006). Since they do not possess all of the same, identical properties of one another, it is logical to say that they are not identical. If they are not identical, they cannot be the same substance (Clarke, 2006). One can be a thinking being, with or without the need for or use of a body. Descartes did not try to argue that the body and mind are not intertwined in some way, though. They are fused to one another throughout this life. That led him to be fascinated as to the nature of the mind-body connection, and what about his specific body made it his (Clarke, 2006). How the mind and body came to be connected was something which he did not understand, but which he often pondered. The body and mind have unity, but they are still separate things (Duncan, 2008).
The claim that…
References
Clarke, Desmond (2006). Descartes: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duncan, Steven M. (2008). The Proof of the External World: Cartesian Theism and the Possibility of Knowledge. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co.
Philosophical Discussion of Descartes Man's incredible thirst for knowledge has spurred our species domination of the physical world, while also guiding the refinement of our morality, but throughout history the role of assumption in shaping knowledge has been the subject of intense philosophical debate. While Plato uses the sudden comprehension of geometric rules a slave in his classic Meno as proof that the paradox of learning is false, Descartes remained unconvinced
5. Kant's "Copernican Revolution" in philosophy is in his genius use of the positive aspects of Rationalism (Descartes and so on) and Empiricism (Locke, Berkeley and Hume). How can you argue this out with the help of the "Critique of Pure Reason"? The human experience of negotiating the universe as it seems to be presented to us is one governed by a great many assumptions. Our education of this process, and
Berkley stated that because the senses were potentially faulty, everyone's sense perceptions and thus everyone's 'truth' was unique and variable. However, most empiricists like Locke believed that some (few) things could be known with certainty, like shape and color, even if other properties of things could not be known. The empiricists come from the Aristotelian rather than the Platonic tradition of philosophy, and had rigorous standards of truth based upon
existence or non-existence of God forms a very central basis to the philosophies of some thinkers. This paper examines the philosophies of Descartes, Kant and Sartre in order to determine the significance and connection of belief in existence and non-existence of God with their respective philosophies. DESCARTES, KANT AND SARTRE The existence of God, the necessity of assuming that God exists, or the non-existence of God play a crucial role in
Philosophy While there is plenty to criticize in the work of Descartes, Locke, and Hume, one cannot justifiably claim that Jose Vasconcelos criticisms of traditional Western views on the nature of knowledge apply to these theorists if only because Vasconcelos' criticisms do not really apply to anything, as his criticisms are largely based on straw men. This is not to say that traditional Western views on the nature of knowledge should
Life in a Godless World For as long as mankind has contemplated its own creation philosophers have pondered the meaning of life largely within the context of humanity's relationship to the divine, from Aristotle's metaphysical conception of God as all actuality to Descartes' systematic attempt to develop a proof of God's existence. The dominance of Christianity throughout much the civilized world invariably constrained the ability of great thinkers to challenge