Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Illegal file sharing has cost the recording industry thousands of jobs. Musicians are denied millions in royalties. This does not even consider illegal file sharing of movies, television shows and software. As with any crime, the only winner is the criminal. Thieves take the property of others without permission, and use it for their own gain. Nobody else wins with illegal file sharing. The negative consequences of illegal file sharing demand that action to be taken to curtail it.
In order to stop such criminal behavior, an effective deterrent is required. The actions of the recording industry have reduced illegal file sharing, but it has not stopped it. People are still sharing files illegally. They do so through file-sharing services like Soul Seek or LimeWire or through BitTorrent sites. Clearly, the current approach of dealing with the issue through civil lawsuits is not acting as a deterrent to a degree that protects intellectual property rights and staunches the negative financial impacts on the recording industry. The more effective deterrent would be criminal prosecution. Chronic file sharers would be subject to felony theft charges, given the dollar value attached to their crimes. This would bring to them the threat of hard jail time. When the specter of jail time is compared with the slap on the wrist these criminals will receive when they are sued, the deterrent value of criminal prosecution is obvious.
In addition to the legal and ethical considerations, there is also a strong economic case to be made in support of governmental prosecution of illegal file sharers. Record companies have seen a decline in profits and been forced to lay off workers. The decline in profits hurts shareholders, which includes mutual funds and pension plans that are owned by a wide cross-section of Americans. The five thousand lost jobs represent five thousand people who can no longer pay taxes. Without jobs they are unable to make a significant contribution to the economy with their purchases. When they find new jobs, the new jobs are likely to pay less, putting these workers into the ranks of the underemployed. Another financial consequence of not prosecuting file sharers is that the rule of law is lessened. Other companies...
If the government did not prosecute thieves and murderers, nobody would come to live here. The rule of law is essential not only on principle but because it saves money in the long run. Criminal prosecution of illegal file sharers is a difficult proposition - modern file sharing software makes prosecution of offenders difficult under the current legal and technological environment (Schleimer & Freundlich, 2001). In the long run, however, it will save the economy money.
The government has been unwilling to get involved in the problem of illegal file sharing beyond superficial law-making such as the law recently passed requiring colleges and universities to deal with the issue on their campuses (Brodsky, 2008). The industry, already suffering the effects of criminal activity, is stuck enforcing the law because the government does not seem to consider it sufficiently important. Illegal file sharing harms the economy. It erodes the strength of intellectual property rights. It discourages the development of creative works, reducing our cultural output. The only winners are the thieves themselves. The government must take a stand. It is their job, their duty, their obligation. Enforcing laws is one of the most fundamental reasons why we have government at all. It is time for the government to live up to its obligation. It is time for the government to begin criminal prosecutions against illegal file sharers.
Works Cited
Lake, David. (2004). Is Illegal File Sharing Declining. PC World. Retrieved November 19, 2008 at http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/000310.html
Schleimer, Joseph D. & Freundlich, Kenneth D. (2001) Criminal Prosecution of Online "File Sharing" Journal of Internet Law. Retrieved November 19, 2008 at http://www.schleimerlaw.com/criminalprosfilesharearticle.htm
Brodsky, Art. (2008) the War Against Illegal File Sharers / Higher Education Bill with File Sharing Warning. Web TV Wire. Retrieved November 19, 2008 at http://www.webtvwire.com/the-war-against-illegal-file-sharers-higher-education-bill-with-file-sharing-warning
Works Cited
Lake, David. (2004). Is Illegal File Sharing Declining. PC World. Retrieved November 19, 2008 at http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/000310.html
Schleimer, Joseph D. & Freundlich, Kenneth D. (2001) Criminal Prosecution of Online "File Sharing" Journal of Internet Law. Retrieved November 19, 2008 at http://www.schleimerlaw.com/criminalprosfilesharearticle.htm
Brodsky, Art. (2008) the War Against Illegal File Sharers / Higher Education Bill with File Sharing Warning. Web TV Wire. Retrieved November 19, 2008 at http://www.webtvwire.com/the-war-against-illegal-file-sharers-higher-education-bill-with-file-sharing-warning
..for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research" was a more important right to protect under Fair Use Doctrine (Liebowitz, 1985, p.4). Freedom of access to information was more important, and creating an unregulated market environment of ideas. Granted, file sharing is not always used for such a legitimate purpose, but then again, neither were 'taped' VHS movies and programs. While
Downloadable, inexpensive music gives more power to listeners they had during the CD age, in which CDs were getting increasingly expensive, and consumers felt forced to purchase them, even if they liked only a few songs on the album. Technology can be empowering. The music industry did have a point: the nature of downloadable music is not like a cassette tape or VHS, given the ease of recording and mass
That is because where customers copy art from CDs and DVDs, in most cases, at least the original copy is purchased legitimately. However, in the vast majority of cases of illegal file sharing online, hundreds and sometimes many thousands of copies are transferred from each original. Even worse, in most cases, even the original file is an illegitimate copy, meaning that the artist who provided the work to all
So who is an American and what an America can or cannot do are questions which are critical to the issue of legalizing immigrants. Does being an American mean you cannot show allegiance to any other country? The images of people raising and waving Mexican flag had enraged many but it need not have. It should be accepted that people who come from different countries would forever hold in their
Whistle Blowing Introduction and History of Whistle Blowing Whistle blowing is the revealing of immoral, illegal or illegitimate deeds to authorities. The authorities may be insiders or from outside the affected organization. Many cases of whistle blowing involve people revealing information to outsiders especially media organizations or pressure groups about an act they consider to be irresponsible, irregular or illegal (Robbins, 1993). Cases of whistle blowing have increased dramatically in the recent
This is in part due to the fact that they have more control over this income than they do the income from CDs. For most artists, CDs are a means to increase exposure, driving revenues from these other streams. There is a growing body of anecdotal evidence that file sharing builds exposure (Ian, 2002). Essentially, file sharing is replacing much of the function of the recording industry. Artists are able