Sociology Significant Others Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
878
Cite
Related Topics:

Self-Image and Significant Others Self-image refers to the internal picture than people hold of themselves, meaning it is who we think we are. However, in many cases, who we think we are may not the same as how others see us. In my opinion, a great deal of my self-image comes from how my significant others see me.

For example, everybody has an inherited temperament. (Barrat, 1991) Combined with various life experiences, this inherited temperament makes up our personality. Some people are naturally shy and quiet; others may be loud or outgoing. It is possible to change outward behaviors and people can learn to be more outgoing or reserved. However, while the outward behavior may change, the inward temperament usually does not. Therefore, someone who has learned to overcome shyness on the outside may still be inwardly introverted.

A person's self-image is made up of natural temperament and input from significant others, which may include teachers, friends, boyfriends, parents, enemies, and more. Sociologists Charles Cooley and George Mead have created some important theories on how the self is shaped and developed by significant others.

According to Cooley, the term "looking-glass self" refers to a person's development of a sense of self through the perception and imagining of how others view and react to them. Cooley believed that the...

...

(Adorno, 2000)
Mead referred to this process as the development of the "generalized other," which emerges from a person's concern with how other react to them. By putting themselves in other people's shoes and judging themselves through another's eyes, people become aware of themselves and develop a self-image. Again, the importance of social interaction in self-image is stressed.

In my opinion, I am a smart, funny, nice person. I am outgoing at times but also have an introverted side. While my friends may see me as outspoken, sometimes I do not speak up because I am unsure about what I am saying. I also see myself as somewhat careless, irresponsible and moody. Overall, my self-image is positive but I know I have flaws.

A find that one of the closest significant others in my life has an extraordinary effect on my self-image. Sometimes I am hard on myself, criticizing my actions, grades and looks. It can be hard to stop saying these negative things to myself. However, my boyfriend constantly shows me that I am significant to him and this message changes how I see myself. Because he feels I am worthy of his constant praise, encouragement and attention, it changes the way I see myself.

Many psychologists view significant others as people who play a major role in our lives but whom…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Aboulafia, Mitchell. The Mediating Self: Mead, Sartre, and Self-Determination. Yale University Press, 1986.

Adorno, Theodore. Introduction to Sociology. Stanford University Press, 2000.

Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Routledge, 1992.

Barrat, D. & T. Cole) Sociology projects: a students' guide. Routledge, 1991.


Cite this Document:

"Sociology Significant Others" (2002, October 04) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociology-significant-others-136057

"Sociology Significant Others" 04 October 2002. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociology-significant-others-136057>

"Sociology Significant Others", 04 October 2002, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociology-significant-others-136057

Related Documents

11). Perhaps the most major and identifiable sociological theorist is Emile Durkheim. He literally helped formulate the ideas and theories of modern sociology, and many of the criminal justice theories are based on his ideas. Durkheim developed many of the modern theories of criminality, such as cultural disintegration, which can lead to an individual's gradual disassociation from society, with no bonds or commitments to a society that is dissolving around

This week's additional readings resonated for me that for many the unequal distribution of wealth and assets can take away healthy opportunities to make these contributions and can turn into feelings of hopelessness, depression, violence, as well as self-destructive tendencies. In a society that is as wealthy as Austraila, it is still amazing that so many individuals experience feelings of deprivation and poverty. Sociology and Health I enjoyed reading about health

Sociology Portfolio The social experience evolves around different dimensions that influence people's everyday experiences and realities in life. Inherent in every event, interaction, individual, and even tangible material/artifact are reflective of a specific kind of social order. Everything is social, and using this premise, this Sociology Portfolio provides a survey of literature and relevant material that illustrate the role that social experience plays in the development of current and essential issues

Sociology: Changing Societies in a Diverse World (Fourth Edition) George J. Bryjak & Michael P. Soroka Chapter One Summary of Key Concepts Sociology is the field of study which seeks to "describe, explain, and predict human social patterns" from a scientific perspective. And though Sociology is part of the social sciences (such as psychology and anthropology), it is quite set apart from the other disciplines in social science; that is because it emphasizes

Instead, the welfare system encouraged perpetual social dependency and provided a reason for poor people not to work at all when the most reliable method of achieving financial independence (besides continuing education) is precisely, to begin working at minimum wage jobs while gradually learning skills and establishing contacts and a record of regular employment that are essential in the long- term goal of qualifying for better work in time

(Frazer 8) to this end she develops the categories of "affirmation" and "transformation." In understanding Frazer's view it is imperative to bear in mind that older regimes of theory cannot achieve the synthesis that she is looking for and that new and more creative modes of political and social theory are necessary. In essence what Fraser suggests is that in order to overcome this antimony between redistribution and recognition and