Paper Example Undergraduate 1,199 words

Tate and Lyle Company history and operations

Last reviewed: December 3, 2009 ~6 min read

Tate & Lyle

a) Tate & Lyle is a food manufacturer, focused on corn and sugar products. The firm adds value through the processing of these raw ingredients into food and industrial ingredients. The company makes sweeteners, ethanol, acidulants, protein, starches and biogums. The company has manufacturing operations in the both the Americas and in Europe. The company's core products are sugar and sucralose (under the Splenda brand). The company has two primary means of value generation. One is processing. Tate & Lyle converts raw ingredients into products usable by both consumers and industry. The second area where the company adds value is in marketing. Both the Tate & Lyle and Splenda brands are widely recognizable and have generate considerable goodwill for the company.

b) The current strategic environment for Tate & Lyle is generally positive. The firm is subject to fluctuating cost of inputs, which are traded on global commodities markets. The company is subject to competition from other sugar and sweetener providers, some of whom are owned by the governments of the countries in which Tate & Lyle competes. The key drivers of success for the next year, as identified in the 2009 Annual Report, are going to be consumer demand and the price of corn. Consumer demand in particular was a difficult variable to assess. The global financial crisis hinted that consumer demand might fall, but this could be offset by the fact that Tate & Lyle's business has been steadily growing.

In terms of financial issues, Tate & Lyle has relatively few. The company is solvent and liquid, as evidenced by its healthy working capital ratios. It has a manageable gearing ratio as well. The gearing ratio was reduced last year as a result of the company's strong growth. Shareholder equity improved and the company was able to increase its dividend slightly. There is very little cause for concern with respect to Tate & Lyle's financials, or its immediate business environment.

2009

2010

Sales

Operating Profit

Finance Income

27

27

Finance Expense

(78)

(78)

Profit Before Tax

Income Tax Expense

(19)

(19)

Profit Continuing Ops

94

Loss/Profit Discontinued Ops

(24)

(24)

Profit for the Year

70

Profit for Minority Interests

5

12

Profit for Shareholders

65

Profit for the Year

70

Divdends Paid

(104)

(104)

Retained Earnings

67

Forecast Balance Sheet

Assets - Non-current

Goodwill/Intangibles

Property, plant, equipment

Investments in associates

8

8

Available for sale financial assets

11

11

Derivatives

34

36

Deferred Tax

30

30

Trade and receivables

5

5

Retirement Benefit Surplus

47

47

Sub-total

2057

1978

Assets - Current

Inventories

Trade and Receivables

Current Tax Assets

6

6

Derivatives

Cash

Assets held for sale

28

28

Sub-total

1942

Total Assets

Shareholder's Equity

Ordinary Share Capital

Share Premium

Capital redemption reserve

8

8

Other Reserves

Retained earnings

Minority interests

26

27

Total Shareholder's Equity

Liabilities - non-current

Trade and payables

11

11

Borrowings

Derivatives

57

18

Deferred Tax liabilities

78

78

Retirement benefit obligations

Provisions for other liabilities

21

21

Sub-total

Liabilities - Current

Trade and payables

Current tax liabilities

77

97

Borrowings and overdrafts

Derivatives

Provisions

11

13

Sub-total

Total Liabilities

Total Equiy and Liabilities

Projected Statement of Cash Flows

Operating

Profit from continuing ops

Adjustments

Depreciation

Exceptional Items

Amortization of intangibles

20

20

Share-based payments

5

5

Finance income

(27)

(27)

Finance expense

78

78

Working capital

31

31

Cash Generated from Cont. Ops 451

Interest paid

(86)

(86)

Income tax paid

(17)

(19)

Cash from discont. Ops 140

Net cash from ops

Cash from Investing

Disposal of property

5

5

Purchase of Fin. Assets

(6)

(6)

Proceeds Disp. Fin. Assets

9

9

Interest received

30

30

Acq. Of subsidiaries

(1)

(1)

Dis. Of Subsidiaries

(4)

(4)

Dis. Of JVs

0

0

Dis. Of Businesses

57

57

Purchase of PPE

(224)

(224)

Purchase of Intangibles

(7)

(7)

Net cash Investing

(141)

(141)

Cash from Financing

Proceeds from issuance of shares

3

3

Repurchase of shares

0

0

Inflow from borrowings

1

1

Repayment of borrowings

(14)

(14)

Repayment of capital

(3)

(3)

Shareholder Dividends

(104)

(104)

Minority Interest Dividends

(1)

(1)

Net Cash Financing

(118)

(118)

Net Increase/Decrease of Cash

Balance at Beginning

Effect of changes in FX rates

40

40

Net Increase/Decrease

Balance at End

Notes: Several assumptions were made in the production of these statements. Many costs were assumed to stay the same. The company was assumed to have reduced its cost of goods sold through improvement of receivables and inventory turnover. As a result of T&L's financial strength, it was assumed that they were going to limit growth in borrowings. Their current tax liability grew in accordance with their expected tax rate for next year. Amortization and depreciation occurred with some of the company's assets, and no new investments were assumed given the uncertain revenue environment posed by the global financial crisis.

2. i) The Black-Scholes model is used to price options. The formula for Black-Scholes is:

C = SN (d1) -- X (e-rt) N (d2)

In this case, S = 432, X = 235, r = 3.7%, t = 43 days.

D1 = 2.23, so N (d1) = .9871; D2 = 1.95, so N (d2) = .974. Therefore C =

432(.9871) -- 235 (.99559)(.974) = 189p

ii) a) The annualized volatility of Tate & Lyle is calculated by the square root of time rule. Thus = .8177(?250) = 12.92%

The continuously generated risk free rate is the logarithm of the nominal risk free rate. In this case, the continuously generated risk free rate is R= ln (1+3.7) = 3.6332%

b) There are two main reasons for the differences between the firm's observed equity volatility and the volatility of its underlying revenue generation. One is that stock prices are forward looking, while revenue generation is backward looking. Market sentiment towards the company can be impacted by its past performance, but the correlation between the two will always be imperfect.

Another key difference is that revenue generation does not translate evenly into equity for shareholders. The firm's capital structure, its operating costs, its taxation rates and a number of other variables all impact on the degree to which revenues flow through to shareholders. The market only measures the value of the equity, not the value of the entire firm.

c) To account for the effects of the dividend, the current share price must be reduced by the amount of the expected dividend. In this case, the expected dividend is 2.268p, so the price should be set to 420.73.

Thus, we have 420.73(.584683) - 423 (177.106)

The price of a call option therefore is 68.83p.

Using put-call parity, the price of a put would be calculated as follows:

You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2009). Tate and Lyle Company history and operations. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/tate-amp-lyle-a-tate-16811

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.