Analyzing Arguments
Part I
The argument of Halevi (2019) in a recent op-ed in the Los Angeles Times is that Boycott Israel movement is misguided because it will not achieve the objective of those who, like Airbnb, are engaged in the protest of Israeli occupation of Palestinian land. The argument is deductive in the sense that it proceeds from a general set of principles and moves to a specific conclusion. The principles that the argument is derived from, however, are arguable themselves as they could very well be false premises. They and the argument will be evaluated in this paper.
The main purpose of the argument of Halevi (2019) is to show that the Boycott Israel movement is a waste of time and will not work, primarily because “when Israelis feel unfairly judged, they don’t recoil but push back. And most Israelis are convinced that the call for boycotts is profoundly unfair.” In other words, the state of Israel will only get more aggressive and adamant in its posture towards the Palestinians as well as towards those who protest Israel’s actions. This argument could be legitimately supported by evidence such as the fact that the Senate recently passed a bill that “would allow state and local governments to bar contractors from advocating for sanctions and a boycott” against Israel (Andrews, 2019). However, just because there is evidence that Israel is indeed willing to “push back” through the strong arm of AIPAC to get the U.S. Congress to act in a way that would hurt the boycotters, like Airbnb, this is no reason to prove that the boycott itself will not work in bringing negative pressure on the Israeli companies who are the target of the boycott. In other words, Halevi uses a number of fallacies here to construct his argument. Those fallacies include circular thinking and the red herring.
For instance, Halevi (2019) argues that Israelis have done nothing to deserve the opprobrium of the boycotters and therefore they will push back politically and the boycott will fail. This is a red herring because the boycotters are not concerned with whether or not the Israelis assume guilt for their occupation of Palestinian land—the boycotters are already convinced of their position and are taking economic-based action to put pressure on Israel to change its political positions. The argument also makes use of circular reasoning because it states that the boycott will fail because Israelis push back when they feel they are being unfairly treated. This conclusion is also the same as...…as well), but because the boycott hurts innocent businesses and others who depend on the products that they make. The argument could then describe a better utilitarian approach to solving the conflict through peaceful dialogue and the hosting of a meeting between the two sides. This would neutralized the conflict because what the boycotters ultimately want is the end of the conflict and a fair resolution for all. By acknowledging the desires of those who are doing the boycotting, Halevi could have better developed a suitable argument. Instead, his argument is defensive and lacking in a proper utilitarian grounding. It also lacks an appropriate appeal to the concept of the good, which can best be achieved through the usage of a virtue ethics perspective. Mill would say that Halevi needs to readjust his argument away from the circular thinking upon which is based both his conclusion and his premise so that the argument is more linear and acknowledges the aim of the side that is doing the boycotting. This would allow Halevi to both highlight the good and develop a suitable alternative to the boycott, which Halevi opposes. The alternative would be based on achieving the objective of the protestors just through better means that are less destructive to Israel’s economic…
Fallacies Logical Fallacies Slippery slope is a logical fallacy where one event is said to lead to another event, which in turn leads to another event, which in turn has significant consequences. For example, a person might argue that if one person is given a pay rise, everyone else will expect a pay rise, and that everyone will expect continual pay rises, and that the organization will go bankrupt. The fallacy occurs
Fallacies The choices that people make determine the shape of things to come. This observation holds true at the individual, organizational, national, and global level. Therefore, it is obvious that close attention needs to be paid to critical thinking ability or the way decisions are made. This inference can be drawn because critical thinking involves the formation of logical inferences, the development of cohesive and logical reasoning patterns, and careful and
Inductive Reasoning and Fallacies in Today's Popular Mass Media (Tabloid News Articles and Advertising Campaigns) In popular mass media, information has become a valuable source of profit. Motivated by the lucrative media business, publishing companies and media agencies sought to provide people with sensational stories and numerous information in order to generate a following in the society. Through tabloid newspapers and advertising, the mass media are able to cater to the
App Fallacy," a columnist New York University's Washington Square News argues wisdom Common Application college application process. You read essay college newspaper; opportunity responds. The fallacy of "The Common App Fallacy" The Common Application is a standardized application that makes it very easy for college students to apply to a multitude of schools, all of which use its basic format. A student merely has to fill out the forms associated with
Positive effects: UPB management will be able to capitalize on the five years of training and other investments in Mark Williams The colleagues will feel a sense of security as Williams has decided to stick with the company Costs with replacing him will now be incurred and the money could be used in another direction UPB clients will be content as they will not have to switch consultants Mark Williams will feel loyal and the
Not all humans exhibit the same jealously levels, behaviors, etc.); and, 2. Today, instinct theory has a more biological emphasis for specific motives and not all (like aggression and sex). but, there is still a strong instinct perspective in the study of animals (ethology) (p. 2). Notwithstanding this lack of consensus, there have been much attention directed to the relationship between instinct theory and the various dimensions of the human
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now