Transfer Of Knowledge In An Organization

Knowledge Transfer Between Generations In a knowledge-based economy, knowledge management has taken on more importance than it has in the past. Skills and understanding of different ideas and processes have to be continually disseminated throughout organizations to for them to keep pace with organizational changes. The application of the knowledge, skills and attitudes that are learned from experiencing a situation on similar situations with effectiveness is also called transfer of learning (Leberman, McDonald, & Doyle, 2006). The transfer of knowledge must come from a range of different sources and flow through the organization in multiple channels as well as in different directions.

Organizations, as a whole, need to have a high level of knowledge, not just certain or senior people. This means that organizations must find ways to ensure effective, efficient transmission of knowledge throughout the organization. This paper looks at the subject of knowledge management to draw some conclusions about knowledge transfer between generations in the modern era. There are many different theoretical approaches and knowledge transfer frameworks that can applied that also can be categorized into four broad principles such as (Haskell, 2001):

The division of transfer of learning into various categories by the taxonomical approach

The focus driven approach of the development and contributions of different disciplines that is application domain driven

The faculties transfer models that involve the examination of the psychological functions to transfer and The revelation, comparison and contrasting of theoretical and empirical traditions that is driven by concept evaluation.

The process of knowledge transfer is beneficial in transferring the learned skills and knowledge to new situations throughout the organization which represents a continuous process in most modern organizations. Most employees are naturally open to learning new skills that can make their work...

...

These transfer also occur at different stages. For example, new employees will have to undergo some level of training and learning process to get them job ready, and experienced employees will have to also undergo continuous education; espcecially due to the rapid advancement of technology (Demirer & Sahin, 2013). There have also been many models proposed to help understand how knowledge transfers in organizations more specifically.
The near and far learning transfer theory deals with the process of application of the knowledge and skills acquired previously to new situations. The near transfer of skills and knowledge occurs when a learner or an employee uses a set of pre-acquired skills and knowledge to situations in the same way every time (Kneppers, Elshout-Mohr, van Boxtel, & van Hout-Wolters, 2007). This model is especially adept when learning transfer is applicable for repetitive tasks or tasks that require the similar procedures and has a high success rate regarding knowledge transfer. However, one disadvantage of this model is that this style of transfer does not allow skills and knowledge that are more complex in nature to be applied to changes in situations and scenarios (Cree & Macaulay, 2000).

Far transfer, by contrast, requires the adoption and adaption of guidelines for the transfer in changing situations. This style of knowledge transfer includes more complex types of knowledge. The advantage of this style of transfer of learning is that this allows the learner to adapt the skills to varying situations, yet the success rate is generally lower than that of near transfer process (Demirer & Sahin, 2013).

Ruch (2000) notes that institutional knowledge is a critical component of an organization as well as a significant source of sustainable competitive advantage. As such, Ruch (2000) argues that there needs to be knowledge transfer between generations, and that organizations need to focus on retaining younger employees…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Cree, V., & Macaulay, C. (2000). Transfer of learning in professional and vocational education. London: Routledge.

Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2013). Effect of Blended Learning Environment of Transfer Learning: an Experimental Study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 153-176.

Forstenlechner, I., Lettice, F. (2007). Cultural differences in motivating global knowledge workers. Equal Opportunities International, 26(8), 823-833.

Haskell, R. (2001). Transfer of Learning. San Diego: Academic Press.


Cite this Document:

"Transfer Of Knowledge In An Organization" (2015, May 20) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/transfer-of-knowledge-in-an-organization-2151031

"Transfer Of Knowledge In An Organization" 20 May 2015. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/transfer-of-knowledge-in-an-organization-2151031>

"Transfer Of Knowledge In An Organization", 20 May 2015, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/transfer-of-knowledge-in-an-organization-2151031

Related Documents

Knowledge Management One of the challenges of knowledge management is deciding on a working definition of what the discipline covers. Levinson defines knowledge management (KM) as the process by which organizations generate value from their intellectual and knowledge-based assets. Her definition goes on to say that generating value from such assets typically involves codifying what employees, partners and customers know, and sharing that information among employees, departments, and even with other

Organizational Change Recruiting and Retaining Talent In response to the scenario provided, the scenario represents one of the more extreme examples of organizational change. However, there are three months to prepare for the change which provides for some level of planning and facilitation for the change. This analysis will create a guide for attempting to meet the objectives of employee retention throughout the transition. There will undoubtedly be a great deal of

Knowledge Management (KM) A new knowledge-based economy of learning individuals, organizations and economies has evolved from the machine-based economy which dominated the developed world throughout the twentieth century. The emergence of a new type of firm is signaled by the familiar symptoms of corporate change such as devolution of managerial responsibilities, more flexibility and skill in the workforce, more recourse to outsourcing, and increased networking both inside and outside the firm

Knowledge Management Mid-Term exam -- You should check all these answers!!!! Especially those in green. Multiple Choice Questions. Circle/Pick the best answer from the given possibilities of a, b, c, and d The two major forms of knowledge, tacit and explicit, are distinguished by: Grew out of a different KM root discipline. Arose at a different point in time during the evolution of the KM concept. Are used in different types of organizations. The fact that they

Businesses constantly face the need to update, the need to innovate. With these businesses come its leaders who feel the same bombardment at all levels. The speed at which change arises causes the lifecycles of typical businesses and the products they sell to last just a short time unless they learn to successfully adapt. As Keen (2000), explains: "Change is seen as necessary merely to survive; transformation is required to

Knowledge Management Succession Plan Strategy KBR Australia Knowledge Management Succession Plan Strategy Kellogg, Brown Root (KBR) is an international company founded by Brown and Root in 1960 as Kinhill Engineers, and has gone through various changes over the years. A significant chapter in its history occurred in 2007, when it was split from Halliburton, to become a fully independent company. KBR's Australian division has offices in Melbourne, Adelaide, Canberra, Sydney, Brisane, Perth,