Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
U.S. Constitution -- Fourth Amendment
Fourth Amendment
At the moment of independence of the United States from Great Britain, the colonials sought to create a charter of laws and regulations that would preserve the people's rights when placed in the face of government. Monarchy for the colonies was at an end; because of the experiences of the people, it was clear to the colonial inhabitants of the then-13 colonies that made up the United States that there would be a need to protect themselves from the abuses of government, be they monarchy or democracy. This desire of protection gave birth to the creation of the United States Constitution in 1787. The Declaration of Independence called upon the abuses of power of the British monarchy. As a follow-up, the Constitution further establishes the extent of the people's rights. That said, the first ten amendments focuses on the definition of the people's rights and the protection of said rights. The ten amendments would ultimately be called the Bill of Rights, and contain the constitutional grounds for protection of the people vs. The United States government.
Of the ten amendments, this paper chooses to put particular emphasis on the Fourth Amendment, which deals with the government's rights to a siege and seizure of private property. The amendment states:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and...
Constitution).
To shortly summarize, the Fourth Amendment seeks to find that an unreasonable search of a person's private property is unconstitutional, and disallowed from being used as evidence against said person. The amendment further states that a warrant must be issued only when there is reasonable cause to search a person's private space. These concessions have been hotly debated by many judicial who interpret the Constitutional amendments using different precedents. Yet there is no denying the importance and the direct linking of the Fourth Amendment to the rest of the Bill of Rights.
Importance of the Amendment
The first three amendments, prior to the Fourth Amendment of invasion of privacy, speak of the freedom with which the people are protected from persecution by the government. In these three amendments, the people have the freedom in religion, speech, the press, the right to bear arms, and the right to refuse the opening of their homes to soldiers in times of peace. These are straightforward enough. The latter amendments proceed to build off on these first three, following with the Fourth Amendment, which…
Works Cited
"Annotated Constitution Fourth Amendment -- Table of Contents." LII | Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School. Web. 30 June 2011.
"Constitution of the United States." National Archives and Records Administration. Web. 30 June 2011. <http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html>.
The First Amendment The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This Amendment basically protects free speech, among other rights—but in recent years it has been necessary to define
Lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=U.S.&vol=408&invol=238). The issues surrounding the 8th Amendment are often complex. The cruel and unusual punishment clause, for instance, may well be at a constitutional crossroads as we move into the 21st century. Depending on the health and position of society, and the manner in which globalization has changed the way America is perceived in the world, and perceives itself, a change in attitude regarding the rubric of punishment is part of
The only way, it would seem, to affect the kind of change that supporters of the initiative want is to amend the state constitution, effectively changing the law of the land. Supporters argue that this is the only viable option left, especially in light of the fact that marijuana is less dangerous the alcohol -- a legal drug -- and that the war on drugs has netted no significant
Georgia (428 U.S. 153). In that case, the Supreme Court finally ruled specifically that capital punishment was not inherently necessarily cruel or unusual, and therefore, was not a violation of the Eighth Amendment in and of itself (Schmalleger, 2008). Since Gregg, the issues surrounding the Eighth Amendment constitutionality of capital punishment relate to the specific methods of implementation in light of evidence that lethal injection, the most common method used
Nelson -- the decision in which was binding on all lower courts -- was decided in favor of the state law in Minnesota banning same-sex marriages (UMT 2010). Conclusion The issue of the rights of gay, lesbian, and transgendered people are still in a state f flux and some confusion, based on the Supreme Court's rulings on the various matters. On the one hand, there is a legal mandate in place
Regardless of the theoretical interpretation of this amendment, the practical effects thus far have been quite clear -- responsibilities and rights not handled by the federal government are left up to state and local governments. One of the most important areas in which this can be seen in action is through the investigation of crime. Because the federal government does not prohibit any state or locality's rights in searching