Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Validity Coefficient
It is important to consider several important factors when interpreting the meaning of a validity coefficient, especially as it applies to various practical situations. For example, a relatively low validity coefficient might be alright in certain situations. If a branch of the armed forces needed to recruit large numbers of new members in a short period of time, it would be flexible in interpreting the meaning of a particular study's validity coefficient. On the other hand, situations might demand a narrow interpretation of the validity coefficient. Using a similar example, if individuals were being screened for entry into a specialized division of the secret services, the factors related to the validity coefficient would be far more meaningful. The factors that impact the validity coefficient are generally related to the cost-benefit ratio.
The above examples of military recruitment illustrate the various factors affecting the validity coefficient. In situations in which large numbers of recruits are needed in a short period of time, strident criteria are less meaningful than numbers. In other words, quantity outweighs quality.
On the other hand, in situations in which small numbers of recruits can fulfill a small number of needed military positions, the validity coefficient becomes more meaningful. If level of higher education was found to be a statistically significant factor in the success of the individual working in the intelligence community, then the commanding officer would want to narrow the department's search to only those applicants who possessed Masters degrees or higher.
Because social scientific studies vary considerably, validity coefficients increase with the number of studies performed. For example, if one study proves that people with Bachelor's degrees earn ten percent more than their counterparts who have Master's degrees, the validity coefficient would be low. The low number of participants in the study relative to the greater population would mean that the study was less valid than those that included a larger number of participants. If a meta-analysis concluded that individuals with Master's degrees actually earned twice as much as individuals with Bachelor's degrees, then the validity coefficient would be greater due to the increased number of subjects involved. Therefore, the factors that impact the meaning of a validity coefficient include size of the population as well as the cost-benefit ration of the coefficient's application.
Presumably, the reliability of the responses between a monitored study and an unmonitored study could be validated by consistent reportage from the peer and the incumbent. This method was also used to control for the study's overall validity: the study would be a more valid measure of counterproductive work actions and their relationship to work stressors if an outside source validated the incumbent's responses. The study's authors still acknowledge a
Validity of the ACSM prediction equation to estimate submaximal O2 during cycle ergometry in cyclists and aerobically-trained non-cyclists Several methods have been developed to estimate oxygen consumption ( O2) during exercise. The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) developed equations to predict the energy cost of various activities, including walking, running, and arm and cycle ergometry. The ACSM cycle ergometery equation uses pedal frequency (rpm), distance of flywheel travel (meters), applied resistance to
Validity The types of reliability used consist of test-retest reliability and internal consistency where the types of validity that were used are construct validity and criterion validity (vmiman). The test-retest reliability is an assessment of the similarity of scores on a particular scale over two or more test occasions. The Pearson correlation coefficients are used to quantify the similarity between the scale scores over two or more occasions. Stability coefficients
Reliability & Validity For the lay person, the notion of personality is often derived from components of an individual's character or make up that has the ability to elicit positive or negative reactions from other individuals. The person who has a propensity for positive reactions from others is often thought to have a 'good' personality. Conversely, the person who tends to elicit not so favorable reactions from others may be thought
Because of this the results of the test may not be effective for what I am studying. In a study done by Ripley and Yuill, (2005), Patterns of language impairment and behavior in boys excluded from school, expressive and receptive language issues in boys barred from primary and secondary schools, to examine the degree of harm, the outline of associations between age, receptive and expressive language, and associations with dissimilar
Another disadvantage regarding the validity of the analysis regarding gender was that the results between the two gendered groups were calculated based upon a mean, which meant that one or two respondents with scores could have a considerable effect, skewing the results in one direction or another. The two sample groups of 59 psychology students and 100 MBA students were relatively small and select as well. Using these populations is