Willie Lowman And Oedipus As Term Paper

Length: 4 pages Sources: 5 Subject: Family and Marriage Type: Term Paper Paper: #22158794 Related Topics: Oedipus The King, Death Of A Salesman, Arthur Miller, Heroes
Excerpt from Term Paper :

His failure at both appears to perpetuate each other: his failure as provider translates to his failure as business and family man, and indeed to his failure as American success. In this way, the American Dream is representative of ultimate success. By failing at this, Willy represents the doubts and fears of many Americans; he fails in all the ways feared by society.

Oedipus' failure occurs on a much larger scale. His success relates to his status as the person of highest importance in society. He however reacts differently from Willy, who first lies to himself and then crumbles under the pressure of the increasingly obvious truth. As the truth becomes increasingly obvious for Oedipus, he still refuses to turn away from his search. When all is finally revealed, Oedipus displays his true character by taking responsibility for his actions. Although the king can hardly be blamed for what happened, he nonetheless believes that he has committed a terrible crime and devises a punishment that he believes he deserves; he blinds himself.

Willy in contrast refuses to take any responsibility for his past behavior or present situation. Instead, another of his subtle mistakes is blaming others instead of himself for his failure as a business and family man. He blames his boss for his failure in the former and his sons for not being what he wanted them to be. None of this is detected in Oedipus, who refuses to blame even those bearing most guilt for his situation. He blames only himself and remains alive for his punishment. Willy chooses the coward's way of suicide, and in the end cannot enjoy the final reprieve from his financial difficulties.

The main difference between Oedipus and Lowman is the distance of their fall. Willy's cowardly fall at the end is not a great leap from the beginning, where he was basically a failure at everything. Being unable to break his downward spiral, Willy commits suicide. On the other hand, one could also see Willy's action as a final act of nobility at the end of a very humiliating life. Perhaps in the society that formed him, suicide was the only final attempt at nobility that was an option for Willy. In this, he is parallel with Oedipus, also a product of his society. Oedipus believes it would be best not only for himself, but also for his

...

Oedipus however fell much farther than Willy in concrete terms from the beginning to the end of the play. He begins as the ultimate symbol of success for the society of his time. At the end, he is humiliated and all sources of power are removed from him. Willy on the other hand is humiliated throughout the play. It simply became overwhelming for him, and therefore not even his death has a shred of nobility to it.

In considering Aristotle's definition then, Oedipus' character is much more parallel to the concept than Willy. Oedipus is noble, filled with pride in himself and his own accomplishments. He comes to a fall, but reacts by taking responsibility for his circumstances and his actions. Willy on the other hand was already fallen when the play began, and was therefore not required to fall much further. Both characters lose everything after the final scene of punishment: friends and family members are left behind or killed through the actions of the tragic heroes. Willy however gains to wisdom, whereas Oedipus accepts that his death will accomplish nothing.

When considering the two heroes, it is important, as mentioned above, to understand that each acts as a tragic hero for his society. Will Lowman appeals to the society of modern America, where ambition and success or the most important achievements. Oedipus' society on the other hand hold the king in high regard. Hence I would argue that both men play a tragic role in their respective plays. It is therefore necessary to also understand that literature emerges from society and therefore presents the reader with a mirror of the values on that society.

Sources

Miller, Arthur. Death of a Salesman Penguin, 1976

Johnston Ian. Fate, Freedom, and the Tragic Experience: An Introductory Letter on Sophocles's Oedipus the King. 2007. http://www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/introser/oedipus.htm

Sophocles. Oedipus the King.

A classics.mit.edu/Sophocles/oedipus.html

Sources Used in Documents:

Sources

Miller, Arthur. Death of a Salesman Penguin, 1976

Johnston Ian. Fate, Freedom, and the Tragic Experience: An Introductory Letter on Sophocles's Oedipus the King. 2007. http://www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/introser/oedipus.htm

Sophocles. Oedipus the King.

A classics.mit.edu/Sophocles/oedipus.html


Cite this Document:

"Willie Lowman And Oedipus As" (2007, October 12) Retrieved October 24, 2021, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/willie-lowman-and-oedipus-as-35212

"Willie Lowman And Oedipus As" 12 October 2007. Web.24 October. 2021. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/willie-lowman-and-oedipus-as-35212>

"Willie Lowman And Oedipus As", 12 October 2007, Accessed.24 October. 2021,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/willie-lowman-and-oedipus-as-35212

Related Documents
Sophocles: Oedipus the King Fate,
Words: 1459 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Literature Paper #: 34541059

In this view, Oedipus's only wrong action was attempting to thwart fate, which only caused him false hope. Thus, this interpretation of the story suggests that fate is supreme, cannot be changed, and is the guiding rule of humans' life. In fact, this view even goes as far as to imply that humans do not have free will -- all is at the mercy of fate. But James Gould points

Oedipus the King Sophocles' Play
Words: 1369 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Mythology Paper #: 91863771

However, the play goes even further than these hints in demonstrating the irrelevance of any supernatural force to the story's action when Tiresias mocks Oedipus for suggesting that the blind seer is the source of the plague (Sophocles 27). When Oedipus accuses Tiresias of a being "a conspirator" to Laius' murder due to his reluctance to tell what he knows, Tiresias responds by asking "Sooth sayest thou?" (Sophocles 26-27). While

Oedipus the King by Sophocles
Words: 1140 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Literature Paper #: 80535589

This is because they are not learning from the lessons of the past and they do not see things for what they really are. When this takes place, there is a possibility that they are open to more problems through failing to understand and address critical issues. Oedipus is used to show this sense of arrogance and contempt for the truth. (Sophocles) ("The Oedipus Plays") Evidence of this can be

Oedipus the King the Ancient
Words: 907 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Drama - World Paper #: 89897156

As a result, he flees from Corinth, where Polybus and Merope, are in order for the prophecy not to be fulfilled. The statement "truth has made me strong" is partially false, because while the main character believed that his life was exactly as he made it, it was actually shaped by his fate. A chain of events had lead to the forming of Oedipus as a strong and wise man.

Oedipus the King Oedipus the
Words: 1077 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Literature Paper #: 39298868

Oedipus, however, does show a great deal of arrogance as a character in the actual play, no matter how much the reader or viewer may feel pity and horror at his fate. Sophocles deliberately chooses to show first Oedipus, not as an innocent, abandoned baby with an injured foot, which is the first sight a reader might have of Oedipus and is the beginning of the actual myth. Instead, the

Oedipus the King Blinded to
Words: 1060 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Mythology Paper #: 11464903

Oedipus does not show unusual arrogance, no more so than his father did when he abandoned his child to cheat death. Oedipus leaves his natural parents out of a desire to protect them, as any son possessing filial pity should do, in the eyes of the Greeks. However, in contrast to the Christian economy of good and evil, where good is rewarded and evil is punished by God, in ancient