This paper examines the growing problem of academic dishonesty in educational settings, identifying three primary contributing factors: the widespread availability of internet sources that facilitate plagiarism, advances in communication technology that enable new forms of in-class cheating, and the rationalizations students offer for their behavior. The paper reviews strategies educators have developed to combat dishonesty, including plagiarism-detection services, assignment design, and increased technological literacy among instructors. It concludes that lasting solutions must go beyond technical countermeasures and address underlying issues of personal integrity and moral values.
Academic dishonesty has existed as long as organized schooling, whether in the form of glancing at a neighboring student's examination, copying a classmate's homework, or plagiarizing source material in written assignments. According to many reports, academic dishonesty has increased dramatically over the last several years, and three factors in particular have been implicated as contributing causes.
The widespread availability of internet sources represents a convenient opportunity to plagiarize online material, especially where instructors are less familiar with the internet medium than their students. Similarly, recent technological advances in communication technology — and the miniaturization thereof — have enabled students to devise clever new strategies to facilitate cheating during in-class examinations.
Interviews with students who admit to cheating reveal that many justify their academic dishonesty by reference to high-profile accounts of corporate dishonesty and the widespread deterioration of business ethics in general (Boon). Others maintain that their demanding schedules and overlapping assignments make it impossible to complete all their work without taking some shortcuts. Finally, some students claim that so many of their peers cheat that they would be at a disadvantage if they failed to take advantage of the same opportunities.
The recent explosion in the availability of information online via the World Wide Web represents an invaluable academic research tool. On the other hand, the sheer convenience of so much information lends itself to academic dishonesty: the abundance of sources and the ease with which material can be copied directly and presented as a student's own work — rather than documented appropriately — make plagiarism a constant temptation.
Instructors have recently begun addressing the problem by using internet services such as Turnitin.com, a subscription service that compares submitted portions of student papers against online material and alerts instructors to any suspected instances of inappropriate similarity (Slobogin). Professor Donald M. McCabe of Duke University is a leading expert on academic dishonesty and the founder of the Center for Academic Integrity, a consortium of two hundred colleges and universities dedicated to preserving academic integrity.
According to McCabe, one of the most important tools in the fight against academic dishonesty — and plagiarism in particular — is a well-informed instructor who is equally adept with the internet medium as his or her students. Among McCabe's suggestions for combating the problem is for instructors to discuss the issue openly and define plagiarism clearly, in addition to assigning unique topics for research that are less likely to appear in usable form online. McCabe also suggests that teachers require outlines and synopses of all submitted papers to be turned in at periodic intervals prior to the final version (Innerst). Still, there is comparatively little that teachers can do to combat other similar forms of academic dishonesty, such as the growing online industry of "custom research," whereby students pay a premium for professional writers to complete their assignments and furnish them for submission as their own work.
Another avenue readily exploited by students is wireless communication technology in the form of PDAs and cellular telephones. Students have become adept at text-messaging exam answers among themselves during tests, communicating via cell phone screens. This method of cheating takes several forms beyond simple collaboration between students sitting in the same room. For example, a student taking an exam can now transmit questions to friends waiting in a library, who then provide answers in real time. Internet-capable cell phones allow students to browse the web from their seats, particularly in large auditoriums where they can do so with relatively little risk of being discovered (Batista).
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.