This essay examines the importance of academic integrity for students entering the criminal justice and security field, arguing that today's students are tomorrow's professionals and must internalize ethical values early. Drawing on three scholarly sources, the paper explores how organizational culture enables power crime among high-ranking officials, how pre-employment MMPI-2 personality testing predicts officer misconduct, and how the code of silence among serving officers undermines corruption reporting. Together, these examples underscore the need for ethical training that goes beyond administrative screening to cultivate genuine integrity in government agencies, law enforcement, corrections, courts, and private security.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
The paper demonstrates the use of empirical research synthesis to support a normative claim. Rather than offering personal opinion about why integrity matters, the writer selects three studies that together cover the problem from different angles — sociological, psychometric, and organizational — and uses them to build a cumulative argument. This multi-source triangulation is a foundational technique in applied social science writing.
The essay opens with a clear statement of purpose and scope, then devotes one body section to each of three examples drawn from the literature. A brief technical section expands on the MMPI-2 screening discussion before the code-of-silence example closes the evidence. The conclusion restates the thesis and adds a forward-looking call to action. The structure is straightforward and appropriate for a short argumentative essay at the undergraduate level.
The importance of academic integrity for students in the criminal justice and security field cannot be emphasized enough. Those who are today's students are the criminal justice and security professionals of the future. This essay briefly examines issues relating to honesty and integrity in criminal justice and security across government agencies, corrections, law enforcement, courts, and private security. Three specific examples are presented that emphasize the need for academic integrity among students entering this field.
There has never been a greater need for integrity among those in the criminal justice and security field. One illustration of how important this is can be seen in the relative ineffectiveness of the criminal justice and security establishment in dealing with issues of power crime — that is, misconduct perpetrated by white-collar criminals positioned at the highest levels of the justice and security apparatus. In an article published in Crime, Law and Social Change, Vincenzo Ruggiero and Michael Welch explore the theory of power crime as a form of compromise in security integrity. The authors point out that a key factor in this problem is the presence of immunity, which can undermine effective strategies for the detection, prosecution, and punishment of those engaged in such abuses. The crime, in effect, becomes naturalized — so embedded in the organizational landscape that those who engage in it genuinely do not believe they have done anything wrong. Indeed, it becomes part of the organizational culture of government, security, or big business (Ruggiero & Welch, 2008, pp. 297).
The examples the authors invoke include the powerful government official who acts with impunity, such as the atrocities committed by U.S. military and intelligence officers at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison. This involved organizational culture and impunity, implying motivations far deeper than financial gain. Such crimes are crimes of power — committed because they can be, and often go unpunished. Another blatant example is Blackwater Security, a private military firm that engaged in reckless violence against Iraqi civilians in the name of security. All of these crimes occurred within an atmosphere of organizational culture shaped by the war on terror, in which perpetrators had little expectation of being caught, let alone prosecuted.
When students are confronted with the variety and severity of crimes committed by powerful people, they may be led to question traditional theories that associate criminal conduct with simple marginalization, poverty, or material and cultural exclusion. On the contrary, the types of misconduct addressed by Ruggiero and Welch point to a culture of political, economic, and symbolic hegemony that produces — and perpetuates — an array of crimes rooted in power itself (ibid., pp. 297–299).
Students and scholars alike may reasonably ask whether it is possible to predict such behavior in candidates for the criminal justice and security field. This question was examined in a study published in Criminal Justice and Behavior that assessed the validity of pre-hire scores on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) — including its Clinical, Restructured Clinical (RC), and Substance Abuse scales — in predicting behavioral misconduct among police officers.
The predictive validity was found to be moderate to strong when disattenuating correlations were applied to account for range restriction. Relative risk analyses revealed that lower cutoff scores on the MMPI-2 scales maximized the prediction of police officer misconduct. This was particularly true in small police departments, as demonstrated in a thirteen-month longitudinal component of the study, in which the Aggressiveness Index was significantly correlated with the accurate prediction of disciplinary suspension days for 107 police officers after three years on the job. This evidence suggests that the MMPI-2 is an accurate indicator of how a potential candidate will perform with respect to integrity while in service (Sellbom, Fischler, & Ben-Porath, 2007, pp. 985–987).
This essay has briefly examined issues relating to honesty and integrity in criminal justice and security across government agencies, corrections, law enforcement, courts, and private security. Three specific examples were presented to emphasize the need for academic integrity among students entering this field. Those who are today's students are the criminal justice and security professionals of the future. They must be well trained in ethical conduct so that they will exhibit it instinctively and consistently throughout their careers in criminal justice and security.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.