This paper applies the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) legal reasoning framework to a hypothetical case involving Marie, whose son died abroad under suspicious circumstances. The paper examines several administrative law issues: importing human remains and potentially hazardous food samples into the United States, cremating personal property in a licensed crematory, transporting remains by air in a sealed metal container, and dispersing remains in a national park, state park, trout hatchery, and public waterway. Drawing on regulations from agencies including the USDA, TSA, EPA, USPS, and National Park Service, the paper concludes which of Marie's wishes a court would likely grant and which would be denied for violating federal administrative standards.
Marie's adult son was murdered in a tragic accident in a foreign country while he was on vacation. The deceased allegedly consumed fruit from a poisonous tree. His mother, Marie, wants the remains to be brought back to the United States, along with samples of the fruit, so that an autopsy and tests can be conducted to identify the actual cause of death. After completion of the tests and autopsy, Marie wants her son's remains to be cremated at a local funeral home. She also wants her son's prized possession — a laptop computer — to be cremated alongside his remains, with everything placed in two titanium boxes her son had created in his capacity as a metallurgical engineer.
Marie wants to mail one of these containers to a relative living near her son's favorite destination for trout fishing at a national park. She wants the relative to break the seal and disperse part of the remains over the trout hatchery and the other part in a nearby public waterway. Marie plans to hand-carry the other container herself by plane to another destination, where she will disperse the remains in a state park that also contains wetlands protected by the federal government. Finally, Marie wants to keep a small amount of the remains and mail them on a simple sheet of paper to her son's father as a symbolic gesture reflecting his neglect and the little value he placed on their relationship.
There are several legal issues presented in this case. These include the transportation of human remains and food products into the United States from a foreign country, the cremation of a laptop computer in a facility licensed only for human and animal remains, and the transportation of remains by air in a sealed metal container as cargo (Walston-Dunham, 2012). Additional issues include the disposition of remains in a national park, a state park, a trout hatchery, and a public waterway, as well as the mailing of human remains in a simple paper container.
Administrative agencies have the authority to establish regulations commonly known as administrative regulations. The relevant administrative regulations in this case are those established by the Department of Agriculture, the United States Postal Service, the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the National Park Service. Based on regulations established by the TSA and EPA, the transportation of human remains from a foreign country into the United States must meet certain requirements. Administrative regulations also prohibit the disposition of human remains in a national park, a state park, a trout hatchery, and a public waterway (United States Government Publishing Office, 2011). Additionally, the cremation of personal possessions such as a laptop computer in a crematory facility licensed only for human and animal remains is prohibited under applicable administrative regulations.
"Which requests violate administrative regulations"
Based on the above analysis, the judge should grant Marie her wishes for transportation of her son's remains and fruit samples into the United States. However, this process must be carried out in a manner consistent with relevant administrative regulations. On the other hand, the judge should reject her wishes relating to the handling and disposition of human remains in protected natural areas and the cremation of a laptop in a licensed crematory, as those actions would violate applicable administrative regulations.
You’re 74% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.