This paper examines interorganizational goal conflict within the criminal justice system, focusing on the tensions that arise among law enforcement agencies, correctional departments, and parole boards. While all three entities share the primary goal of reducing crime and improving public safety, secondary pressures — including budget constraints, prison overcrowding, and personnel shortages — generate interdepartmental conflict that undermines progress toward that shared objective. The paper traces the three-stage path a convicted criminal moves through and explains how resource limitations at each stage compound the problem. It concludes by proposing collaborative, solution-oriented strategies, including interdepartmental meetings and shared administrative responsibilities, to refocus agencies on their common mission.
Conflict can arise from all sorts of different situations. In a workplace setting — and particularly in one where the central issue is a social problem — conflict can arise from practical elements such as budget constraints and limited human resources. In a field such as criminal law and correctional services, the general goal is to mitigate the problem of crime and concomitantly increase public safety. However, in pursuing these goals, obstacles such as budget constraints and personnel shortages produce a conflict among secondary priorities. While the primary goal remains the mitigation of crime, the path toward achieving it is necessarily shaped by the means available. As such, law enforcement agencies, correctional departments, and parole divisions often find themselves in conflict as a result of these secondary pressures, which detracts from their focus on the primary goal.
In criminal justice, there are three main stages a convicted individual can expect to move through. First, there is conviction by a law enforcement agency. Second, the correctional department incarcerates the individual. Third, the case is reviewed by a parole board. In committing themselves to improving public safety, law enforcement agencies seek to convict and incarcerate as many criminals as possible. The rationale is that removing criminals from the streets directly mitigates crime. Correctional facilities pursue crime prevention through rehabilitation and reformation. The difficulty, however, lies not only in limited physical space, but also in financial and staffing constraints.
Correctional departments are under extreme strain because they lack sufficient space to house the growing number of individuals convicted by law enforcement. In turn, parole boards have become increasingly stringent in their release decisions. While attempting to uphold standards of public safety, parole boards also face budget constraints that make it difficult to manage a high volume of parolees without hiring additional parole officers. This creates conflict among law enforcement, correctional departments, and parole boards. As law enforcement convicts a growing number of individuals, prison capacity is exhausted, while parole boards are unable to turn over a sufficient number of released convicts to ease that pressure. The strain placed on individuals within each agency may result in an inability to find targeted solutions, and interdepartmental hostility may develop instead. This in turn perpetuates the problem rather than resolving it. Moving forward requires shifting focus away from immediate logistical and financial concerns and toward a solution-oriented approach centered on the primary goal.
"Interdepartmental cooperation to restore shared focus"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.