Affirmative Action: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Future
This paper examines affirmative action in the United States, tracing its origins from the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Executive Order 11246 through its evolution into broader policy. The paper reviews the primary arguments for and against affirmative action, including its role in promoting diversity and correcting historical inequities, alongside criticisms such as reverse discrimination, minority underperformance, and increased racial tension. Landmark Supreme Court decisions — particularly Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger — are analyzed for their constitutional implications. The paper concludes by addressing the future of affirmative action, including a likely shift toward race-neutral policies and the underlying need to address educational inequities before students reach college.
- Background and Origins of Affirmative Action: Historical roots from Civil Rights Act to 1972 policy
- Advantages of Affirmative Action: Diversity, equity, and educational access arguments
- Disadvantages of Affirmative Action: Reverse discrimination, mediocrity, and racial tension
- The American Judicial System and Affirmative Action: Supreme Court rulings on Michigan admissions cases
- The Future of Affirmative Action: Shift toward race-neutral policies and root causes
- Conclusion and Recommendations: Summary of findings and call for systemic reform
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Balances multiple perspectives by presenting both proponent and opponent arguments with supporting scholarly citations, avoiding one-sided advocacy.
- Grounds abstract policy debates in concrete legal cases — particularly Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger — giving the analysis tangible real-world grounding.
- Uses a structured research-question framework that keeps the analysis focused and makes the paper easy to follow from literature review through analysis to conclusion.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a literature review to synthesize multiple sources before applying them in a direct analytical section. By separating the "Literature Review" from the "Analysis," the writer shows how to first establish what scholars have found and then interpret those findings against specific research questions — a standard technique in social science research papers.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction and research questions, followed by a literature review divided into advantages and disadvantages. An analysis section then revisits each research question directly, drawing on the reviewed literature. The paper closes with a conclusion that summarizes findings and a recommendations section that points toward future research. This mirrors a formal research paper structure appropriate for an undergraduate social science course.
Background and Origins of Affirmative Action
Affirmative action is an issue that has garnered a great deal of discussion in recent years. Ever since the inception of affirmative action in America, affiliated policies have been embroiled in controversy. One of the primary contemporary complaints about affirmative action policies is that they are no longer needed because segregation and other factors that made such policies necessary no longer exist. As a result, some states and institutions have abandoned affirmative action policies.
This paper explores the issue of affirmative action, focusing on the various opinions associated with affirmative action policies. The research exposes the advantages and disadvantages of affirmative action and examines the ways in which affirmative action has changed the racial and gender compositions of institutions of higher learning and certain workplace environments.
Affirmative action is described as "positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in areas of employment, education, and business from which they have been historically excluded" ("Affirmative Action"). Affirmative action efforts first surfaced in 1964 with the passage of the Civil Rights Act, which contained "affirmative action" as "a remedy federal courts could impose on violators of the Act. Likewise, after 1965 federal contractors had been subject to President Lyndon Johnson's Executive Order 11246, requiring them to take 'affirmative action' to make sure they were not discriminating" ("Affirmative Action"). The mandates established in 1964 and 1965 resulted in a much larger policy that came into law in 1972. The 1972 law set the precedent for the affirmative action policies that are still in existence today.
Affirmative action policies have long been controversial because of the perceived benefits they afford certain groups. Their inception in the workplace and in education has been met with mixed opinions. On the one hand, proponents assert that affirmative action is the only way to level the playing field and reverse the damage done by past racism. On the other hand, opponents assert that such policies amount to nothing more than reverse discrimination. Many opponents also argue that affirmative action policies violate the Constitution of the United States.
The key research questions guiding this paper are: What is the purpose of affirmative action? What are the advantages and disadvantages of affirmative action? What has the American judicial system said about affirmative action policies? And what does the future hold for affirmative action policies?
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.