This paper presents a financial analysis of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) as a prospective component supplier and strategic partner for HTC. Drawing on AMD's 2011 Annual Report and stock performance data, the analysis examines key financial ratios — including current ratio, return on assets, profit margin, asset turnover, and debt-to-equity — to assess AMD's stability and reliability. While AMD's performance is characterized as mediocre rather than exceptional, the analysis finds that the company demonstrates meaningful signs of stabilization following a difficult period. The paper concludes that AMD represents a sound, low-risk partner for HTC in the medium term, particularly given AMD's decades of industry experience and commitment to core semiconductor products.
This paper demonstrates applied financial ratio analysis as a decision-support tool. Rather than simply listing ratios, the writer interprets each metric in relation to a specific business question — whether AMD is a reliable long-term partner for HTC. This interpretive layering (data → pattern → business implication) is a hallmark of effective finance and business writing at the undergraduate level.
The paper opens with a framing of HTC's business concern, then moves into an overview of AMD's industry position and history. The central analytical section covers financial ratios and stock performance before arriving at a clearly stated recommendation. A brief conclusion reinforces the strategic logic. The structure follows a classic problem–analysis–recommendation format suitable for a business case memo or short analytical report.
HTC's hesitancy in doing business with any third-party electronics supplier is more than understandable, given the volatility of the industry and of the general economic environment. Ensuring that any partnership formed today will still be contributing to the company's bottom line in the future is an all but impossible task, and yet any substantial investment in a partnership — such as a dependence on a singular supplier for a key component — would become a major liability if the partner were unable to perform over the medium and long term. A financial analysis and general assessment of the proposed partner and component supplier, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), is thus definitely warranted. As the following analysis will show, AMD's current financial standing and record of performance is not stellar, but the company is strong enough to provide a solid and profitable partnership to HTC for the foreseeable future.
AMD is a manufacturer of a variety of technology components for use in computers and other devices, producing primarily for business-to-business sales but also catering to end consumers who have more than the typical level of knowledge and skill when it comes to building computers and utilizing these components (AMD, 2012). With semiconductors and microprocessors making up its core products, AMD was founded in 1969 and has remained a stalwart company in the industry ever since, though it has certainly gone through periods of poorer performance — one of which it appears to be emerging from now (AMD, 2012; Yahoo Finance, 2012). A ratio analysis of the company bears this out.
The company's current ratio fell slightly from 2010 to 2011, driven by both a drop in current assets and a rise in current liabilities. However, total liabilities fell dramatically alongside an increase in equity and an attendant drop in the debt-to-equity ratio, suggesting that AMD may be restructuring its capital finance structure (AMD, 2012a). The return on assets and asset turnover ratios both increased very slightly, while the profit margin held steady for two years at a respectable seven percent. Taken together, these indicators point to a company that is quite solidly holding its own, but does not appear poised to engage in any major growth projects or make any headline-grabbing changes in performance any time soon (AMD, 2012a; Yahoo Finance, 2012). This could actually make AMD an even more ideal partner and supplier for HTC, as it would provide some assurance that AMD would remain committed to the projects it takes on rather than realigning its strategic priorities.
HTC is in some ways a stronger company than AMD and is almost unquestionably a more dynamic one. This can work to HTC's benefit, allowing it to set the parameters of the partnership and to trust that AMD will reliably and consistently perform as per the arrangements made. As long as the company is strong enough to continue performing — and AMD is — a certain level of stagnancy is desirable in a supplier relationship.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.