This paper examines the American Anti-Slavery Society, founded in 1833 under the leadership of William Lloyd Garrison. It traces the organization's origins in the early nineteenth-century debate over the morality of slavery, its methods of public persuasion—including petitions, publications, and lecture circuits—and its deliberate inclusion of free Black individuals in prominent roles. The paper also considers the Society's limited reach into slave states while arguing that its advocacy contributed meaningfully to the ideological climate that ultimately led to the Civil War.
The early nineteenth century brought a series of significant changes to the newly formed United States, as people invested considerable energy in efforts to improve conditions across the country. The issue of slavery, in particular, received increasing attention from the public, as a series of conflicts emerged from debates over the morality of slavery and the degree to which the institution shaped thinking in the United States as a whole.
The American Anti-Slavery Society was founded in 1833 in an attempt to address the problem of slavery. Its founders sought to raise public awareness about the effects that slavery had on the states. Slave uprisings also contributed to the desire to remove slavery from the country, with white Southerners in particular fearing that enslaved people would eventually retaliate because of the suffering they endured, placing slaveholders and their families in danger.
William Lloyd Garrison was primarily responsible for creating the organization and went to great lengths to have Congress acknowledge its demands. As one account describes it, "The societies sponsored meetings, adopted resolutions, signed antislavery petitions to be sent to Congress, published journals and enlisted subscriptions, printed and distributed propaganda in vast quantities, and sent out agents and lecturers (70 in 1836 alone) to carry the antislavery message to Northern audiences" (American Anti-Slavery Society). Individuals involved in the movement focused on recruiting members from religious communities, as these groups were considered more likely to develop a thorough understanding of the association's goals and principles.
"Free Black members in high-ranking Society roles"
"Success in the North, limited reach in slave states"
While the association had a limited influence on slave states and was largely unable to persuade those communities of the gravity of slavery, it still played an important role in shaping the antislavery thinking that contributed to the ideological tensions leading to the Civil War.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.