Fundraising Strategies for the American Red Cross
This position paper examines the American Red Cross's fundraising activities, with a focus on how the organization has historically leveraged disasters and public generosity to generate contributions. Beginning with an overview of the Red Cross's current revenue streams—including donations, blood product charges, and government reimbursements—the paper proposes two fundraising strategies: developing executive-level fundraising skills and optimizing the organization's existing donor database through more precisely timed and targeted direct mail solicitations. Drawing on research by Ryzhov et al. (2015), the paper concludes that using donor data analytics to refine direct mail campaigns represents the most cost-effective path to increasing long-term donor cultivation and nearly doubling response rates.
- Introduction: Overview of Red Cross fundraising challenges and paper scope
- Success of Using Donors During Disasters: Review of existing revenue streams and donor generosity
- Two Fundraising Strategies and Their Implementation: Executive training and direct mail optimization strategies
- Selecting the Optimal Fundraising Strategy: Rationale for choosing donor database direct mail strategy
- References: Cited sources in APA format
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its recommendations in concrete financial data (e.g., $749 million in contributions in fiscal year 2020), lending credibility to its claims about the Red Cross's existing revenue base.
- It balances two distinct strategies before justifying a single optimal choice, demonstrating structured analytical reasoning rather than a one-sided argument.
- Citations from peer-reviewed management science research (Ryzhov et al., 2015) provide empirical support for the direct mail strategy, elevating the paper above purely opinion-based advocacy.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the "compare and select" argumentative structure common in business and nonprofit management writing: two strategies are introduced and described in parallel, then evaluated against the organization's specific constraints (limited budget, broad mandate, existing donor data) before a reasoned recommendation is made. This mirrors professional decision-memo format and shows how to use literature to justify a practical choice.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with context and a roadmap paragraph, then dedicates a section to reviewing current fundraising success. Two strategies follow in clearly labeled subsections. The final section explains why Strategy 2 is superior, supported by quantitative research. A references list closes the paper. This five-part structure is well-suited to undergraduate business or nonprofit management courses requiring evidence-based position papers.
Introduction
During its nearly century-and-a-half existence, the congressionally chartered American Red Cross (hereinafter alternatively "the organization" or "the Red Cross") has provided timely assistance to millions of Americans in times of extreme need. Today, the Red Cross faces the challenge of building on its reputation for caring in order to raise scarce funds amid a seemingly interminable global COVID-19 pandemic and an epidemic of mass shootings across the country.
The purpose of this position paper is to discuss the past and current success of the American Red Cross in using donors during disasters to raise funds, and to provide additional or alternative fundraising strategies based on a review of the relevant literature. First, a summary of the organization's success using donors during disasters is provided, followed by a description of two different fundraising strategies the Red Cross can use and how they would be implemented. Finally, a selection of the optimal fundraising strategy and the supporting rationale for that choice conclude the paper.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.