This paper examines the theological development of the Baptist movement from its Anabaptist predecessors in the sixteenth century to the formulation of the London Baptist Confession of Faith in 1644. Drawing on William Lumpkin's Baptist Confessions of Faith, the paper compares the Eighteen Dissertations of 1524 with the 1644 Confession to identify areas of continuity and divergence. Key topics include the Anabaptist contributions to evangelical belief — sola scriptura, separation of church and state, freedom of conscience, believers' baptism, and holiness of life — alongside their notable rejection of justification by faith alone. The paper also addresses the distinctions between General and Particular Baptists and the Calvinist influences on early Baptist identity.
The paper demonstrates comparative historical analysis: it sets two confessional documents side by side across roughly a century of development and uses specific theological markers — justification by faith, baptismal practice, church-state relations — to chart doctrinal evolution. This technique allows the author to make a measured argument about continuity and divergence without overstating a direct ancestral link between Anabaptists and Baptists.
The paper opens by framing its comparative method and source base. It then surveys five Anabaptist theological tenets before turning to the 1644 Confession and its Calvinist character. The final section distinguishes General from Particular Baptists around the doctrine of atonement and closes by noting the unresolved question of direct lineage between the movements. The structure moves logically from precursor to successor, with the theological comparison anchoring each section.
This essay examines the London Baptist Confession of Faith of 1644 and the Eighteen Dissertations of 1524, as presented in William Lumpkin's Baptist Confessions of Faith. The comparison has been undertaken specifically to gauge the development of the Baptist movement from its Anabaptist predecessors to its more fully developed form over the course of a century.
The Anabaptists were, of course, the predecessors of the Baptist movement. A core question that we ask in retrospect is whether or not they believed in justification by faith — a central conviction of Martin Luther and his Ninety-Five Theses. To address this question, the Eighteen Dissertations offer important evidence. Interestingly, the Anabaptists rejected justification by faith alone, which stood at the core of Luther's theology.
Nevertheless, the Anabaptists made invaluable contributions to the Reformation. Several tenets of evangelical belief that would come to be identified as distinctively Anabaptist are recognizable to students of Protestant history even today.
The first of these contributions is sola scriptura — Scripture as the only ultimate source of authority. Many times the Anabaptists were more consistent on this tenet than reformers such as Martin Luther or, more definitively, John Calvin. The Anabaptist radicals insisted on biblical authority alone for certain practices in matters of church worship and polity.
Secondly, the Anabaptist radicals preached a separation of church and state. The Anabaptists viewed the church as the assembly of the saved — an institution antithetical to this world and sometimes antagonistic to society. This conviction is precisely why they advocated for the separation of church and state.
Thirdly, the Anabaptists preached freedom of conscience. This position grew directly from their beliefs about the secular state. They held that excommunication was the ultimate remedy for heresy, and what they opposed was the persecution by the state that was so common in their era. For this reason, they denied the right of the state to execute or punish anyone for their religious beliefs or teachings. Even within the Reformation era, this was a radical and revolutionary notion.
Fourthly, the Anabaptists were practitioners of believers' baptism. They were the first to point out the complete lack of explicit biblical sanction for infant baptism. Most had no particular objection to the mode of baptism and practiced sprinkling (affusion). For this reason, they were not true Baptists in the modern sense.
Finally, the Anabaptists placed great emphasis on holiness of life. They gave serious weight to spiritual experience, obedience to divine standards, and a practical form of righteousness. Their rejection of justification by faith alone was grounded in James 2:20, which states, "Faith without works is dead."
On most of the five points considered above, Baptists would strongly agree with the Anabaptists. However, the Anabaptist rejection of justification by faith alone provides an important set of data points that illustrates the differences between the Anabaptists and modern Baptists in both form and practice.
These Calvinist flourishes differentiated the Baptists of the early 1600s from what we know of most Baptists today. These beliefs were based upon the "Grace Baptist" positions that emphasized the power of grace and salvation based upon faith, as evidenced by baptism. However one views these commitments, the particularistic faith ultimately still reckoned with James 2:20 — a point of continuity that connects Baptist theology, however indirectly, to its Anabaptist forerunners.
Lumpkin, William L. Baptist Confessions of Faith. Brentwood: Judson Press, 1969.
Taylor, John, and Chester Young. Baptists on the American Frontier. 3rd ed. Macon: Mercer University Press, 1995.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.