This paper examines Hans Christian Andersen's fairy tales as vehicles for bourgeois moral instruction, drawing on the critical framework of Jack Zipes. Through close readings of "The Emperor's New Clothes," "The Red Shoes," and "Thumbelina," the paper argues that Andersen consistently rewards conformity and punishes vanity, disobedience, and social transgression. Notably, these moral lessons are applied unevenly across class and gender lines: men and boys who transgress face mild ridicule, while girls and women who step out of prescribed domestic roles suffer far more severe consequences. The paper concludes that Andersen's tales ultimately reinforce a conservative vision of bourgeois housewifery and female subordination.
The paper demonstrates comparative close reading anchored to a critical framework (Zipes). Rather than summarizing the tales, the writer identifies recurring ideological patterns — vanity, class transgression, gender roles — and traces how Andersen applies them with notably different consequences depending on the character's sex and social position. This is a model approach for literary analysis essays that must synthesize multiple primary texts under a single interpretive lens.
The essay opens by introducing the Zipes framework and establishing the bourgeois morality thesis, then moves tale by tale: "The Emperor's New Clothes" addresses class and male vanity; "The Red Shoes" introduces gendered severity of punishment; "Thumbelina" completes the argument with domesticity and marriage norms. The conclusion synthesizes all three tales into a unified double-standard argument. Each section both stands alone and advances the overall claim.
According to critic Jack Zipes, Hans Christian Andersen's telling and retelling of folk tales reflects the author's views of what constituted "proper" behavior for both children and adults. Andersen advances a specifically bourgeois notion of morality in which both the upper classes and the lower classes are chastised when they display self-centered or imprudent behavior. This moral framework operates consistently across his most celebrated tales, yet — as close reading reveals — it is applied with notable unevenness depending on the sex and social position of the transgressor.
In the famous story "The Emperor's New Clothes," a foolish emperor is taken advantage of because of his vanity. His excessive concern for his physical appearance leads him to commission the most elaborate costume imaginable. The fabric, supposedly visible only to those fit for their positions, causes all the great men of the land to pretend they can see the imaginary clothes. The leaders of the land are thus rendered ridiculous. Only a child is willing to tell the plain truth.
The leaders know they are probably not fit for their positions and are reluctant even to examine the clothes as they are being made — reflecting Andersen's view that royalty and the aristocracy do not deserve their privileges. Yet the Emperor's punishment is comparatively mild: he is humiliated, nothing more.
Andersen does not celebrate the wisdom of the common person and children in all of his stories. This is most apparent in "The Red Shoes," in which the poor, adopted daughter of a wealthy woman shows no appreciation for her benefactress and suffers grievously as a result. Like the Emperor and his minions, the girl is vain — but because of her vanity she must suffer far worse than he does. When children transgress, their fate is more severe than mere humiliation.
The little girl comes to associate finery and aristocracy "above her station" with a pair of red shoes. She believes, erroneously, that the red shoes represent her liberation from poverty — she was first noticed by her rich guardian while wearing them by the road. She exploits the older woman's poor eyesight so that she is allowed to be confirmed wearing the red shoes. During the confirmation ceremony, the girl thinks only of her beauty, not of prayer, and she later neglects to nurse the sick old woman on her deathbed, choosing instead to go dancing at a ball.
Eventually, the girl must have her feet chopped off by a woodcutter because her shoes will not stop dancing and she cannot remove them. She is humbled, repents, and finally accepts the values of religiosity that Andersen endorses. The tale's message is unambiguous: children — and especially girls — must be obedient and grateful to both adults and God.
There is a clear gender ideology at work in the contrast between these two tales. The Emperor and the child who condemns him are both male, so the Emperor's vanity is not treated as an evil requiring severe punishment. The commoner boy is even permitted to defame his elders. The girl of "The Red Shoes," by contrast, is mutilated for a comparable sin of vanity and social aspiration.
Young girls who transgress the values of proper decorum are punished in "The Red Shoes," and girls who are domestic like Thumbelina are rewarded when they uphold standards of bourgeois housewifery. Men who are vain are merely figures of fun, and bold boys are approved of in "The Emperor's New Clothes." Taken together, these three tales reveal that Andersen's moral universe, while ostensibly aimed at correcting vanity and self-interest across all social ranks, enforces a markedly harsher standard upon girls and women than upon their male counterparts — a double standard that sits at the heart of his bourgeois vision of the properly ordered world.
You’re 70% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.