Skip to main content
Research Paper Undergraduate 6,275 words

Armenian Genocide: Causes, Atrocities, and Turkish Denial

~32 min read 6 sections History · Ottoman Empire
Abstract

This paper examines the Armenian Genocide within the full sweep of Armenian history under Ottoman rule. Beginning with the ancient origins of the Armenian people and their status as a Christian minority in a Muslim empire, the paper traces how the millet system, rising Turkish nationalism, economic resentments, and World War One collectively created the conditions for mass murder. It documents the Hamidian massacres of 1895–1897 as a grim precursor, then analyzes the systematic deportations, executions, and starvations of 1915 carried out by the Young Turks' Committee of Union and Progress. The paper concludes by examining Turkey's sustained campaign of denial and the international community's failure to hold the perpetrators accountable.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Historical framing of the Armenian Genocide's origins
  • The Armenian People and the Coming of the Ottomans: Ancient Armenian identity, faith, and Ottoman conquest
  • Armenian Life and Politics under Ottoman Rule: Millet system, rising nationalism, and Armenian political organizing
  • A Taste of Things to Come: The Hamidian Massacres: 1895–1897 massacres as genocidal precursor under Abdulhamid
  • The Great Slaughter: 1915 deportations, executions, and systematic extermination
  • The Agony of Turkish Denial: Turkey's ongoing denial and international failure to prosecute
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper grounds its argument in deep historical context, tracing Armenian vulnerability back through the Byzantine period and the millet system before arriving at 1915, which makes the genocide feel structurally inevitable rather than random.
  • It weaves primary-source eyewitness testimony — from Ambassador Morgenthau, American consular officials, and survivor accounts — directly into the narrative, giving abstract statistics a visceral human weight.
  • The conclusion ties the historical analysis to a contemporary political critique, connecting the mechanics of genocide to the mechanics of denial, and showing that both are acts of calculated power.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates effective use of causal layering: rather than presenting a single explanation for the genocide, it builds a multi-factor argument involving religious animosity, economic resentment, European nationalism, imperial decline, and wartime opportunism. Each section adds another layer, so that by the time the 1915 massacres are described, the reader understands the full structural architecture behind them.

Structure breakdown

The paper is organized chronologically and thematically across six sections. The introduction establishes stakes with vivid imagery before providing historical framing. Two background sections cover Armenian origins and Ottoman minority politics. Two genocide sections move from the 1895 precursor massacres to the full 1915 extermination campaign. A final section shifts to the present, analyzing Turkey's denial as a continuation of the original crime. This arc — from ancient history to contemporary politics — gives the essay both historical depth and argumentative urgency.

Essay 6,275 words

Introduction

Children dead or dying in the street. Trenches filled with corpses. Thousands of villages destroyed. The countryside cleared of its inhabitants. A people herded into concentration camps. Organized terror. Foreign diplomats looking on and doing nothing. A government at war claiming to protect itself from the enemy within. These are not scenes from Iraq or Darfur, nor are they images of the Jewish Holocaust carried out by the Nazis during the Second World War. Man's inhumanity to man has a long history, and this particular nightmare dates to an earlier "war to end all wars" — the first war to be so called.

In 1914, an Austrian archduke was assassinated at Sarajevo, and Austria, Germany, and their ally, the Ottoman Empire, went to war against Britain, France, and Russia. The Ottoman Empire also quickly began its own war — against the Armenian people. At the start of the First World War, the Ottoman state remained an empire in name only: a backward, multi-ethnic shell that straddled two continents. Founded and controlled by the Turks, the Ottoman realm was mostly Muslim but contained substantial Christian and Jewish minorities. With a population of somewhere between 1.5 million and three million, the Armenians were one of the most significant of these minority groups. [1] But in a country desperately trying to modernize by becoming a nation-state of Turks only, simply being a minority would prove a deadly liability — the Armenian people were marked for annihilation.

The holocaust that began in 1915 was seen by contemporaries as an event without precedent. In the words of the American ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, Henry Morgenthau:

"I am confident that the whole history of the human race contains no such horrible episode as this. The great massacres and persecutions of the past seem almost insignificant when compared with the sufferings of the Armenian race in 1915." [2]

Beginning on April 24th of that year, the leaders of the Armenian community — doctors, lawyers, businessmen, intellectuals — were rounded up and killed. The leaders of the Empire's ruling party, the CUP, made use of modern technology — telegraphs and railroads — to order the collection of Armenian men, women, and children and their transportation to the desolate reaches of the Syrian desert. [3] Like the later slaughter of the Jews, this would be an industrial operation. Though made to appear as a reaction to the exigencies of war, the destruction of the Armenian people — again like that of the Jews and Gypsies during the Second World War — was carefully arranged and had been long planned.

In 1915, it was a rebellion that was cited as the rationale for deporting and then killing the Armenian population. In the period 1894 to 1897, it was the activities of Armenian political parties that caused Sultan Abdul Hamid to order murder. [4] And even before that, Armenians had been subject to occasional massacres — attacks that went hand-in-hand with discriminatory laws and a status as second-class citizens. [5] The history of the Armenian people, and in particular their history in the Ottoman Empire, was often filled with dark episodes. But until 1915, the fate of Armenia had never been so bleak. What had happened during the First World War and the years preceding it to transform traditional enmities into a bloodthirstiness so terrible that the world had no name for it yet? What was the origin of this "genocide"?

The Armenian People and the Coming of the Ottomans

A people with a long and proud history — "perhaps the last surviving relic of the ancient Anatolian civilizations" [6] — the Armenians had lived in eastern Asia Minor for millennia. They had an independent kingdom that was contemporary with the Greeks, Persians, and other civilizations of Antiquity.

"Armenian tradition expresses identity mainly in terms of conflict, enshrining at its core a struggle, ostensibly extending over millennia, to maintain and protect the nation's distinct character. The struggle is expressed in mythical, religious, and historical terms — very different sets of metaphors and events, through all of which, however, a continuity is perceived." [7]

A core feature of that identity is the Armenians' Christian faith. In the third century, Armenia became the first country in the world to adopt Christianity as its official religion. After Constantine moved his capital to Constantinople and made Christianity the state religion of the Roman Empire, the Armenian Church remained close to the tenets of Greek orthodoxy. By the sixth century, however, the Armenians had chosen not to adhere to the Council of Chalcedon, and their church moved off in its own direction — another aspect of Armenian uniqueness. [8]

"For 1,700 years the Armenian church has remained a central institution in the life of the Armenian nation. The determining role of the church in the cultural, social, national, and political domains clearly indicates its full engagement, as a major institutional power, in the nation-building process. The centrality of the church's role in the life of the nation has made it an important point of reference in crucial moments and critical situations." [9]

In later, more troubled years, the Church would still provide a focus for the hopes and aspirations of the Armenian people. Along with their language — a unique branch of the Indo-European family — and their unique alphabet, religion set the Armenians apart from their neighbors.

During the more than one thousand years that the Eastern Roman Empire existed, Armenia was frequently under the rule of the Byzantine emperors. It was in this period that Armenians first settled in other parts of Asia Minor, and also in Constantinople. The Byzantine Empire, though Roman in origin, became increasingly Greek in culture, language, and outlook, until Byzantium became synonymous with medieval Christian Greek civilization. Armenians who settled in Byzantium's cosmopolitan capital had little to fear from discrimination or persecution. "In a generation or two, the Armenians… and others who migrated to Greek-speaking areas forgot their own languages, intermarried with Greeks, and became indistinguishable from them." [10]

Yet Byzantine power would not remain unchallenged. With the rise of Islam in the seventh century, Arab conquerors swept across Byzantium's eastern provinces. Syria and the lands beyond were lost, and for the first time the Armenians in their homeland found themselves with Muslim neighbors. The eruption of the Islamized Seljuk Turks into Asia Minor in the eleventh century meant not only the loss of further territory for the Eastern Roman Empire, but also new pressures and challenges for the Armenian people. The Seljuks pushed great numbers of Armenians out of their ancient lands in the Caucasus, on the northeastern edge of Asia Minor, south into Cilicia. There, in the Taurus Mountains, they founded a new Armenian kingdom and established an additional center of Armenian population and civilization. [11]

A new group of Muslim Turks, the Ottomans, overran the territories of their brethren, the Seljuks. By the fifteenth century these Ottomans had subjugated almost all of Asia Minor, both Seljuk and Byzantine, and had made territorial inroads into Europe. The Armenians, too, fell under their sway. The patterns of later centuries were beginning to be established. Armenians quickly became important as a mercantile class in the new and rapidly expanding Ottoman Empire.

"The commerce of the Armenian middlemen originated in Persia, found in silk an eminently marketable commodity, and by the early seventeenth century had expanded to the farthest reaches of northern Europe and eastern Asia. In the Ottoman Empire, the Armenians constituted a Christian community to whom the government granted autonomy in religion, economic life, and even internal politics. Their religion also gave them access to the lands of Christian Europe. Thus, they moved easily in both societies." [12]

Armenians had thus established themselves in an important position in the Ottoman Empire's economic and social life even before the Turks swept into Constantinople in 1453. The capture of the Byzantine capital spelled the end of the Eastern Roman Empire. The city became the seat of what was now the Western world's most powerful state. For the next four and a half centuries, Ottoman sultans would hold sway over a multi-ethnic empire that spanned Europe, Asia, and parts of Africa. Muslims, Christians, and Jews would live side by side, but not necessarily as equals.

4 Sections Hidden · 2,680 words
Armenian Life and Politics under Ottoman Rule900 words
The Ottoman policy toward other ethnic groups was precisely the opposite of that pursued by the Byzantines. While Muslims were treated as full subjects of the Sultan and…
A Taste of Things to Come: The Hamidian Massacres420 words
By the 1890s conditions were ripe for disaster. In the wake of the Ottoman debacle of the Russo-Turkish War,…
The Great Slaughter760 words
Abdulhamid's endeavor to re-mold the Ottoman state along ethno-religious lines ultimately failed in strategy, though not in intent. The Sultan had tried to reshape the social, religious, and cultural…
The Agony of Turkish Denial600 words
It is now more than ninety years since the slaughter came to an end. Hundreds of thousands of Armenian men, women, and children suffered and…
Key Concepts in This Paper
Armenian Genocide Millet System Young Turks Ottoman Decline Hamidian Massacres Ethnic Cleansing Genocide Denial Pan-Turkish Nationalism CUP Deportations
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Armenian Genocide: Causes, Atrocities, and Turkish Denial. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/armenian-genocide-causes-atrocities-turkish-denial-41774

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.