This paper examines two employment law scenarios involving at-will employment and age discrimination. The first case analyzes whether an employee named Alice has legal recourse after termination, exploring the at-will employment doctrine under U.S. labor law and its three recognized exceptions: public policy, implied contract, and implied covenant of good faith. The second case evaluates a claim by Voinovich, an older worker who was not rehired after a subsidiary's disbandment, under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) and the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act of 1990 (OWBPA). The paper concludes that Alice faces significant legal barriers, while Voinovich has a viable discrimination claim.
Under U.S. labor law, at-will employment means that an employer can terminate an employee's employment at any time without good cause and without any legal consequences (National Conference of State Legislatures [NCSL], 2017). In other words, the employer can dismiss an employee even in the absence of reasons such as poor performance, misconduct, or economic necessity. Likewise, an employee can leave a job at any time without any reason and without any legal consequences. At-will employment also means that an employer can amend employment terms — such as benefits, wages, and paid time off — without warning and without legal consequences. Even so, an employer cannot dismiss an employee for illegal reasons, such as the employee possessing protected characteristics (e.g., gender, race, and religion) or complaining about illegal activity, harassment, or discrimination.
There are recognized exceptions to the presumption of at-will employment. These include public policy, implied contract, and implied covenant of good faith (NCSL, 2017). The public policy exception means that employees are protected from adverse employer actions that may violate the public interest. The implied contract exception means that an employer may be restricted from dismissing an employee at will if promises of permanent employment were made — either orally or through the employer's documents — even if no written agreement existed. The implied covenant of good faith exception means that an employer cannot act in bad faith when dismissing an employee. For example, dismissing an older worker to avoid paying retirement benefits may be interpreted as bad faith on the part of the employer.
"Assesses Alice's limited legal recourse against HRTC"
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) prohibits discrimination in employment against persons aged 40 years and above (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [EEOC], n.d.). This means that it is illegal for an employer to treat an employee less favorably on the basis of age with respect to any aspect of employment, including recruitment, firing, promotion, compensation, fringe benefits, work assignments, layoff, and training. It is also unlawful to harass an employee because of their age.
Employment discrimination on the basis of age is further prohibited by the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act of 1990 (OWBPA), which was enacted as an amendment to the ADEA. According to the OWBPA, employers are required to offer older workers the same benefits offered to younger workers.
"Applies ADEA and OWBPA to Voinovich's rehiring denial"
"Cited sources for employment law statutes and guidelines"
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.