Book Review: Barbarians Led by Bill Gates by Edstrom & Eller
This book review examines Jennifer Edstrom and Marlin Eller's Barbarians Led by Bill Gates: Microsoft from the Inside (1998), a critical insider account of how Microsoft achieved dominance despite chronic management dysfunction. The review explores the authors' central arguments about poor planning, chaotic internal organization, and leadership failures at Microsoft, while acknowledging the role of luck, market timing, and occasional technological genius in the company's rise. The reviewer also considers the authors' credibility and bias, ultimately drawing broader lessons about corporate creativity, responsive leadership, and the power of ubiquity in shaping business success.
- Overview and Central Contradiction: Book's core tension between criticism and acknowledging success
- Planning Failures and Quality Control: Microsoft's poor foresight and bug-ridden software
- Organizational Chaos and Leadership Focus: Internal power struggles and competition-driven leadership
- The Role of Luck and Corporate Infighting: Author bias and luck as Microsoft's primary success factor
- Lessons from Microsoft's Management Model: Three transferable lessons from Microsoft's dysfunction
- Broader Implications and the Ubiquity Argument: Ubiquity as protection against flawed business practices
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review maintains a balanced critical stance, acknowledging both the authors' valid criticisms and their potential bias — noting that Edstrom and Eller have personal grievances that color their analysis.
- It moves fluidly from summary to analysis, extracting three concrete managerial lessons from the narrative rather than simply retelling the book's content.
- The closing analogy to McDonald's and Wal-Mart elevates the argument to a broader cultural and business-strategy observation, giving the review intellectual range.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This review demonstrates source credibility evaluation — a core academic skill. The writer does not simply accept the authors' claims but interrogates their motivations (a fired insider and an executive's daughter), then weighs those biases against the validity of specific arguments. This models how readers should approach any primary or secondary source.
Structure breakdown
The review opens with a statement of the book's central contradiction, then works systematically through the four management functions (planning, organizing, leading, controlling) as an analytical framework. It pivots to author bias before extracting transferable business lessons, and closes with a broader cultural analogy. The structure mirrors a standard evaluative essay: describe, analyze, critique, generalize.
Overview and Central Contradiction
On the surface, Barbarians Led by Bill Gates: Microsoft from the Inside seems to hold within its covers a central contradiction. On one hand, the authors continually lambast the Microsoft Corporation's narrow worldview and greed. On the other hand, they also admit that Microsoft, at least by the standards applied to most capitalist enterprises, is a resounding success — both in terms of its profitability and its technological innovations. The company did learn from its mistakes and capitalize upon many market opportunities that came its way, however serendipitously.
While authors Jennifer Edstrom and Marlin Eller allege that Microsoft often bungled many aspects of the core functions of managing — planning, organizing, leading, and controlling — they also argue that because of luck, and convergent cultural and marketplace circumstances, Microsoft has triumphed, and that success creates more success.
Planning Failures and Quality Control
In terms of planning, Edstrom and Eller present evidence that Microsoft has shown more than occasional poor foresight, such as its initial belief that the Internet would only be a passing fad. As they note, "It didn't turn Gates on, it was too mundane" (Edstrom & Eller, 1998, p. 10). The company's quality controls have also been poor, evidenced by its dissemination of bug-ridden and virus-prone applications to the public. Microsoft has generated almost as much public animosity as it has generated sales, even among disgruntled users who have little choice — other than Macs — but to use its products.
Organizational Chaos and Leadership Focus
Microsoft's organization has often been chaotic, ridden with Balkanized power plays and internal conflicts. Its leadership is frequently more focused on besting the competition — particularly Apple — rather than pursuing true excellence. Gates is portrayed as wanting to "beat" Apple more than learn from Apple's unique strengths.
And yet, despite all of these factors, Microsoft continues to flourish. Edstrom and Eller do acknowledge that Microsoft has occasional flashes of genius. Gates was among the first to understand the power of integrated machine languages, of which BASIC was the first. At times, the authors' picking at various glitches in Gates' technology seems like score-settling with the benefit of hindsight — vulnerabilities such as "the problem with running in protect mode is that when one program starts seeping instructions into another, the computer crashes" seem obvious in retrospect (Edstrom & Eller, 1998, p. 75). But the breadth and scope of the company's ambitions are so large that mistakes that might have destroyed a smaller company are absorbed by its colossal market share.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.