This paper reviews Gayle C. Avery's Understanding Leadership: Paradigms and Cases (2004), a textbook-style work that surveys leadership theory through a historical and structural lens. The review summarizes the book's two-part organization: the first section categorizes leadership theories into four paradigms spanning classical antiquity to the present, while the second section presents ten international case studies illustrating those theories in practice. The reviewer assesses the book's strengths — particularly its comprehensive scope, didactic clarity, and emphasis on the evolving role of followers — as well as its weaknesses, including delayed methodological transparency and a surprisingly broad periodization of pre-twentieth-century leadership models.
In many ways, Gayle C. Avery's Understanding Leadership was written as and functions as a textbook. The author's primary purpose in composing this work was to elucidate the myriad principles of leadership in a highly stratified manner so that its core concepts are readily identifiable and accessible to the general reader. The methodology that the author incorporates into her approach is discernibly didactic. Furthermore, what Avery inevitably lacks in detail about many of the leadership principles discussed, she compensates for by providing a highly comprehensive overview of the topic. By contextualizing many of her ideas within a historical framework, the author is able to demonstrate the evolution of notions of leadership from classical antiquity to the present and to debate the effectiveness of those notions (Avery, 2004).
One of the most significant strengths of Understanding Leadership is intrinsically related to the author's structuring of the work. The book is divided into two separate parts which serve as theory and example, respectively. In the first part, the author categorizes most notions of leadership into four distinct paradigms, allowing readers to understand both the similarities and the differences among many theoretical principles. The second portion of the book provides case studies that identify and exemplify many of the concepts introduced in the first part. The provision of salient examples demonstrating how leadership manifests itself in several areas of society — including public administration, politics, standard decision-making processes, and policy in general — helps the reader grasp the varying conceptions of leadership that the author describes.
The primary purpose of the first part of the book is to address the broad questions and definitions of leadership that have accompanied the term, and to treat them in an academic manner in which leadership is studied as a discipline. To that end, the author categorizes most leadership theories and their attributes into four separate categories. The first comprises leadership theories that are strategic or external in nature, followed by those that are didactic, organizational, and those that apply to individual and group levels of leadership. The relationship between leadership theories that apply to both individuals and groups is related to general decision-making, which is evident across a wide variety of spheres — from one of the most basic forms of leadership, such as the leadership of a family, to more complex leadership involving consequences that have a lasting effect upon the general public, such as those pertaining to government.
What makes part one particularly useful to the formal, academic study of leadership is that it identifies many of the key terms utilized in the analyses of the case studies in the second part of the book. Many of these terms pertain to the often conflicting notions of leadership that have accompanied the concept since it first arose during the first of four epochs that Avery uses as paradigms. The first of these spans from ancient times to the 1970s, which the author calls the classical period of leadership. This is followed by the transactional period, which spanned from the 1970s to the mid-1980s. Next came what the author labels the visionary period of leadership, in which ideas about leading were further refined and expanded to incorporate a more autonomous approach on the part of both leaders and followers. Finally, there is what Avery refers to as the organic period, which began in the 2000s and is ongoing (Avery, 2004, pp. 17–18). Characteristics of this period include minimal differences between leaders and followers, or organizations in which the adaptability and accountability of members is so strong that there are either no designated leaders or everyone is considered a leader.
The central purpose of the second part of Understanding Leadership is to offer a variety of case studies that effectively demonstrate the varying principles of leadership addressed in the first section. Notably, Avery has selected examples from international settings encompassing North America, Europe, and Australia, so that students are able to understand the global application of the concepts she has introduced. Ten case studies are used in total. Some of the more interesting examples apply to formal leadership in a political context, in which the author shows presidents employing some of the same leadership theories used by those in private corporations — such as BMW and Rodenstock (Avery, 2004, p. 279) — to establish policy and draw upon the assets that their followers represent. The decision-making processes that the author portrays for both private and public leadership demonstrate the consistent tendency of leaders to incorporate greater input and support from their followers in determining what policies are adopted and what decisions are made.
"Ten international cases illustrating leadership principles"
"Comprehensive scope vs. structural and periodization weaknesses"
Avery, G. C. (2004). Understanding leadership: Paradigms and cases. Sage.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.