Essay Undergraduate 612 words

Behavioral Activation Treatment of Anxiety in Older Adults

~4 min read

Abstract

This paper reviews Turner and Leach's (2010) study on behavioral activation treatment of anxiety (BATA) in three older adults, published in the International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy. The review summarizes the study's ABC research design, the measurement instruments employed — including the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, and two researcher-developed tools — and the outcomes observed across baseline, treatment, and maintenance phases. The paper also evaluates the study's methodological limitations, particularly its small sample size, reliance on subjective self-reporting, and the risk of confounding variables, while acknowledging its strengths in focusing on an underserved population and empowering participants through self-monitoring.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

The review clearly situates the study within its research design framework, explaining the ABC phases in plain language before evaluating them critically.
The paper balances critique with acknowledgment of genuine strengths, avoiding a one-sided dismissal of the original study's contributions.
It identifies specific methodological concerns — small sample size, subjectivity of self-report, and correlation vs. causation — grounding each in the study's actual design choices.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates critical source evaluation: it summarizes the original study's methods and findings accurately before pivoting to assess their limitations and scientific validity. This two-step move — describe, then critique — is a core skill in academic review writing and prevents the common error of criticizing without first establishing what is being critiqued.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a brief identification of the source and its purpose, then walks through the study's design phases and measurement tools in sequence. It transitions into a frank assessment of methodological weaknesses, including sample size, observer bias, and causal inference problems, before closing with a balanced acknowledgment of the study's commendable features. The structure mirrors the study's own progression, making the critique easy to follow.

Introduction and Study Overview

The 2010 article "Experimental Evaluation of Behavioral Activation Treatment of Anxiety (BATA) in Three Older Adults," published in the International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy by Jarrod S. Turner and David J. Leach, examines the use of behavioral activation treatment (BATA) in older adults using a statistical analysis of self-monitored depression and anxiety scales. The experiment was conducted in an ABC research design format to evaluate the effect of behavioral activation treatment on the reported anxiety levels of each participant.

Research Design and Phases

The study followed a structured three-phase design: "The A phase was baseline; B phase was treatment; and C phase was maintenance/follow-up" (Turner & Leach 2010: 375). Statistically speaking, the A phase — the baseline — served as a control measure against which the experimental and follow-up phases were evaluated.

Measurement Instruments

During the initial phase, patients were asked to report symptoms of anxiety and depression using two established instruments. The first was the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI; Beck & Steer, 1990), a 21-item questionnaire designed to identify symptoms of anxiety. The second was the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), a 21-item questionnaire consisting of three 7-item self-report scales that measure the severity of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. Rating scales are a commonly used tool in statistical research, allowing researchers to measure increases or decreases in specific symptoms.

In addition to these established instruments, the authors also developed their own measurement tools specifically for the study. The Daily Anxiety Rating Scale (DARS) was used to rate anxiety levels at different times during the day. The Behavior Self-Monitoring Diary (BSMD) was a daily diary instrument designed for recording minutes of activity across three time periods each day. Together, these tools allowed researchers to assess symptom severity not merely as ordinal rankings — that is, simply as more or less — but in terms of intervals that expressed the degree of severity more precisely.

3 Locked Sections · 275 words remaining

Study Findings · 60 words

"Anxiety and daily activity improvements in C-phase"

Methodological Limitations · 130 words

"Small sample, subjectivity, and causation concerns"

Strengths and Conclusions · 85 words

"Data-driven approach and focus on older adults"

You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

Behavioral Activation BATA ABC Research Design Beck Anxiety Inventory DASS-21 Self-Monitoring Older Adults Anxiety Measurement Correlation vs. Causation Observer Effect