This paper examines how U.S. Auto, a struggling American car manufacturer, can apply competitive benchmarking to improve its management, reduce costs, and increase profitability. Using Ford Motor Company and Toyota Motor Company as benchmarking targets, the paper analyzes the specific practices each company has adopted in response to shifts in the global automotive market. Ford's investment in full hybrid technology and its Michigan manufacturing complex are highlighted as innovation-driven strategies, while Toyota's kaizen philosophy, just-in-time production, and Toyota Production System are presented as models for waste elimination and cost efficiency. The paper concludes by recommending a five-step benchmarking methodology for U.S. Auto to follow.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
U.S. Auto is an American car manufacturer with a significant past in the American automotive market, but a less promising present and future, as the company is currently struggling for survival. The company's main negative issues that need to be corrected are related to outdated plant assets, inflated labor costs, and a lack of any significant prospects that could provide a boost to future profitability. The only aspect that U.S. Auto is placing its hopes on is a hybrid gas-electric engine that the company has developed. Given that negotiations with AutoMex have failed, the company must find other strategies to help it survive.
U.S. Auto should therefore consider benchmarking as a method of reducing certain negative aspects, improving positive ones, and ultimately increasing the company's profit. To begin, the company must identify, analyze, and adapt the practices of the most profitable car manufacturers in the world in order to improve its management and overall performance. The two companies identified as suitable benchmarking targets are Ford Motor Company and Toyota Motor Company. Although they have faced similar issues, these two companies represent different cultures, different types of management, and different models that can serve U.S. Auto's best interests.
Benchmarking has become a cornerstone of modern management, and it is a method U.S. Auto should implement after understanding several key characteristics. First, it requires a degree of organizational modesty on U.S. Auto's part. Second, benchmarking is not merely a simple identification of strengths, but a rigorous analysis that takes into account constructive and functional particularities. Third, it demands the active and responsible participation of the company's personnel. Finally, benchmarking is especially well suited for complex diagnostic studies of the kind U.S. Auto currently requires.
Both Ford Motor Company and Toyota Motor Company have had to confront significant issues affecting their operations, management systems, production outlooks, and profitability. Importantly, however, the difficulties these companies faced were not the result of poor management, organizational dysfunction, or a lack of resources. Rather, they were driven by the evolution of the global car market and shifts in worldwide consumer buying behavior.
In Ford's case, the central challenge was keeping pace with innovation and new market developments. As hybrid vehicles became increasingly popular, Ford decided to orient a portion of its activity toward this emerging field. The company learned that innovation improves driving, and it began to be driven by innovation itself. The areas improved through this commitment include technology, safety, and design. Ford developed full hybrid technology for what it described as the world's first sport hybrid sport utility vehicle (Ford Motor Company, 2007). This innovative system allows a vehicle to operate on the electric engine alone, the gasoline engine alone, or both engines simultaneously. The technology helps emit 81% fewer smog-forming emissions and delivers between 400 and 500 miles of travel on a single tank of gas. The company also invested $2 billion in cutting-edge manufacturing and environmental features for its Michigan manufacturing complex.
"Toyota's kaizen, JIT, and TPS practices"
"Five-step competitive benchmarking action plan"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.