This paper addresses a persistent patient safety problem in surgical settings: the failure of circulating nurses to properly document and track biological allografts in the operating room. Mandated by The Joint Commission, allograft tracking is frequently neglected due to cumbersome binder-based documentation systems. The paper reviews recent research on coded labeling and IT-driven tissue tracking systems as more efficient alternatives, considers the costs and barriers to adopting such technologies, and argues that improving compliance with tracking requirements would enhance patient safety, meet regulatory standards, and ultimately justify the investment in modernized documentation infrastructure.
A primary goal of modern nursing research has been to improve overall nursing quality so that patients receive better care. A number of studies have focused on nursing behaviors that can be refined to improve the quality of care patients receive. The recent discourse clearly illustrates a problem regarding nursing staff and the proper handling and tracking of biological allografts.
In the surgical field, one area of safety that must be addressed is the tracking of biological allografts. This activity is a mandatory requirement of The Joint Commission. A number of leading cell and tissue banking organizations have recognized the crucial need for appropriate labeling and have worked on creating labels that are easily read and recognized by nursing and physician staff (Brubaker, 2010). Zabel (2009) also discusses how the Transplantation Transmission Sentinel Network was established to help strengthen security and safety controls, improving the accuracy of graft labeling and processing.
Despite these efforts, circulating nurses frequently fail to fill out and document the appropriate paperwork as part of the overall tracking of biological tissue in the operating room. The current system requires nurses to locate binders containing received biological tissue information from the manufacturer. If the binders are not in their specified location, the nurse often fails to follow through with the documentation due to the demanding nature of the surgical environment. Grafts are then used without being tracked.
This is a serious concern because lives depend on proper labeling to ensure that patients receive exactly what they need (Bren, 2005). Mislabeling can ultimately result in potentially dangerous outcomes for patients. These nurses are in a unique position to understand and implement, with some adjustments, a procedure for documenting biological allografts in a simpler and more efficient manner.
One such approach described by Brubaker (2010) is the use of coded labels enabled by innovative information technology directives. Coded labeling would help automate the process, reducing the potential for human error in the manual documentation of various allografts. This approach demands more complex data structures to store and categorize all relevant data, but recent research has demonstrated that it is a far more successful strategy (Edgerton, Grizzle, & Washington, 2010).
By eliminating the need to search for physical binders, nurses would be able to complete their required paperwork in a timely fashion. This health information technology-driven system would prevent nurses from failing to complete the appropriate paperwork, whether by oversight or due to time constraints. The development of tissue request tracking systems, as documented in biobanking case studies, illustrates how informatics improvements can meaningfully reduce documentation errors (Edgerton, Grizzle, & Washington, 2010).
"High costs and resistance challenge implementation"
If the procedure of biological allograft tracking and documentation were adjusted to make it easier and more efficient for the circulating nurse, the likelihood of this process being overlooked would be significantly reduced. By increasing compliance with graft tracking, healthcare facilities would better meet The Joint Commission's requirements, adhere to hospital policy, and most importantly, increase patient safety. The evidence supports investing in modernized, technology-assisted documentation systems as a meaningful step toward safer surgical outcomes.
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.