This paper examines the relationship between biological psychology, cultural diversity, and academic achievement, arguing that nature and nurture are not opposing forces but complementary ones. Drawing on evolutionary theory and developmental psychology, the essay explores how genes provide a base for intelligence and motivation while culture shapes what is valued, learned, and achievable. Using Gottlieb's canalization research and related scholarship, the paper demonstrates that profound cultural deprivation — such as restricting educational access by gender or ideology — can suppress academic development even where genetic potential exists. The conclusion integrates biology and culture into a unified framework: biology is the foundation, and culture is the veneer that shapes its expression.
Cultural diversity and academic achievement are two areas where psychology has long debated nature versus nurture origins, as though one excludes the other. The following essay attempts to construct a synthesis between the two, showing that both can be integrated into a single science. Biology bestows the individual with certain genetic traits; culture defines what is desirable, what is to be believed, how one is to judge, and how one is to behave. As regards academic achievement, all individuals are born with a base rate of intelligence and motivation; culture may augment or deprive the individual of academic opportunities, thus shaping academic achievement.
Evolutionary development transmits itself via two mechanisms: genetic variation and natural selection. Genes affect the transmission of traits, and genetic frequencies change from generation to generation as environments differentially affect individuals. Culture affects behavioral changes that, in turn, are passed on to the next generation.
In other words, biology provides the motivation and intelligence for learning, whereas the environment — that is, culture — provides the content of what is to be valued and learned. Culture defines what is desirable, what is to be believed, how one is to judge, and how one is to behave. Culture depends upon the specific environment, and different environments espouse different value structures. The biological, innate cognitive systems enable us to absorb those structures and, by absorbing them, to internalize one's particular cultural prototype.
Culture also defines "normality" and "abnormality" by deviation from or adherence to its rules. Biology, for instance, may have bestowed an individual with extreme temperament characteristics. Culture may categorize this biological attribute as sociopathic or murderous aggression. The individual possesses his or her biological characteristics; culture provides a name for those characteristics and responds to them according to its own particular tendencies.
The genetic tendencies of an individual also influence the treatment that individual receives within a given culture — namely, the hierarchy or privileges accorded to them — and to that degree, cultural attributes are more likely to be internalized. Genes are also more likely to prevail over culture in some cases. An individual with certain genetic behavioral patterns that are contrary to cultural teachings may display resilient non-conformity to enculturation.
In short, culture is a substratum of society — and therefore the same culture often shows differential patterns depending on the larger society it exists within — while humans represent an interplay of biological, societal, and cultural elements (Cairns et al., 1990). In this way, Richerson (1993) sees biology and culture working together to form a concerted personality, or, as Wilson (1975) put it, culture is merely a thin overlay glossing over biology.
"Cultural deprivation suppresses cognitive and scholastic growth"
Developmental scientists have often made a distinction between nature and nurture — that is, biological versus societal or environmental influence on the individual. This essay suggests that nature and nurture can be integrated and reduced to a biological framework, using culture and academic achievement as illustrative examples.
You’re 43% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.