This essay examines the distinctive traits that developed in three early British American colonies—Virginia, Maryland, and Massachusetts Bay—despite their shared cultural origins. It compares their economic foundations, from New England's timber and fishing industries to the southern plantation economy and cash crops. The paper also analyzes ideological differences rooted in religion and politics, the policy of salutary neglect, the influence of the Glorious Revolution, and British Crown taxation policies. Finally, it addresses relations between colonists and Native Americans, including trade partnerships, land conflicts, and the impact of the Seven Years' War on colonial development.
Although the early British colonies in the New World generally exhibited similar cultural characteristics, settlements in Virginia, Maryland, and Massachusetts Bay each developed distinctive traits. The differences among these three colonies stemmed from several ideological and geographic factors that shaped their economies, governance structures, and social cultures in markedly different ways.
New England settlements depended less on agriculture for economic growth than on timber, milling, and fishing, whereas the southern colonies—including both Virginia and Maryland—relied on the region's fertile soils for the development of plantation farming and cash crops. Slavery sustained economic growth across Massachusetts Bay, Virginia, and Maryland alike. Even though New England did not develop plantation cultures like those in the South, a thriving rum trade drove market demand for new enslaved people from Africa. Unlike in Virginia and Maryland, Massachusetts colonists did not purchase enslaved Africans for their own use; rather, they traded enslaved people as commodities in exchange for molasses produced in the West Indies.
Ideology—both religious and political—provided another key point of difference between the Massachusetts Bay colony and the Virginia and Maryland colonies. Puritanical culture reigned supreme in Massachusetts Bay, and despite proclaiming a love of liberty and freedom of religion, several episodes of hysteria broke out in New England, including the persecution of Quakers. In Virginia and Maryland, new settlers whose religious beliefs or cultures differed from those of the English elite sought refuge in the interior lands. As a result, scores of settlers in the southern colonies lived in near-isolation, far removed from the political controls of colonial governments and of the British Crown.
Freedom and independence remained guiding ideologies across all the British colonies, including Massachusetts Bay, Virginia, and Maryland. As colonial governments pulled away from the Crown, they nevertheless based their local leadership systems loosely on British models. Crown representatives served in gubernatorial roles, but a laissez-faire, free-market-driven policy allowed colonial governments to evolve on their own terms.
The so-called "salutary neglect," championed by Sir Robert Walpole, allowed the colonies to develop thriving business and trade markets independent of Crown control. In addition to salutary neglect, the Glorious Revolution also fostered an independent spirit among colonial settlements. After the deposition of James II, the colonies exhibited a spirit of political liberation fed by the humanist theories of John Locke, which championed the rights of the individual over the supremacy of any government.
The Glorious Revolution also directly led to the official unification of the Massachusetts and Plymouth colonies under one entity: the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Local colonial governments developed along the lines of the British parliamentary system but independent from it—governors were no longer exempt from legislative challenges, and elected officials had the opportunity to self-govern and to weaken ties with the motherland.
"Crown imposed tariffs straining colonial relations"
"Land disputes and trade shaped indigenous-colonial relations"
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.