Broken Spears: Aztec Account of the Spanish Conquest
This paper reviews and analyzes Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of America, edited by Miguel León-Portilla. The paper provides historical background on Hernando Cortés's defeat of the Aztecs and examines the book's significance as the first major account of the conquest told from the indigenous perspective. It analyzes how Cortés achieved victory through cultural assimilation, strategic use of translators, and exploitation of internal divisions among Indian tribes. The paper also debates the contested legacy of Doña Marina (La Malinche) as either traitor or symbolic mother of the Mexican mestizo nation, ultimately arguing for a balanced reading of both the Aztec and Spanish perspectives.
- Introduction: Overview of Broken Spears and its significance
- Historical Background of the Conquest: Chronology of Cortés's defeat of the Aztecs
- Domination Engendered through Assimilation: How Cortés used language and culture to conquer
- Heroine or Traitor: The Role of Doña Marina: Debating La Malinche's legacy and divided loyalties
- Domination through Manipulation of Internal Division: Cortés exploits inter-tribal rivalries to defeat Aztecs
- Uniting the Two Perspectives: Arguing for balanced Spanish and Aztec viewpoints
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper does not simply summarize the book but uses it as a lens to argue for a balanced, dual-perspective reading of the conquest — giving the analysis genuine critical purpose.
- Historical narrative and literary criticism are smoothly integrated: the background section grounds the reader before the essay moves into thematic analysis.
- The paper incorporates specific concrete examples — Aguilar's role as translator, Doña Marina's biography, the Cempoalan alliance — to support each analytical claim rather than relying on generalization.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of counterargument and synthesis. Rather than accepting the book's indigenous-victim framing uncritically, the writer acknowledges the book's pro-Aztec bias and then redirects the analysis toward reconciling the Spanish and Aztec accounts. This move — naming a bias, then transcending it — is a hallmark of mature critical writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction to the book and its significance, followed by a detailed historical chronology of the conquest. The body is organized thematically into two analytical sections: how Cortés used cultural assimilation to gain advantage, and how he exploited inter-tribal rivalries. A focused sub-analysis of Doña Marina's ambiguous legacy bridges these themes. The conclusion calls for synthesizing both perspectives to understand the birth of modern Mexico.
Introduction
Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of America, edited by Miguel León-Portilla (Beacon Press, 1992), tells the Aztec peoples' account of the Spanish conquest of Mexico. Throughout history, the conquest has been told from the viewpoint of the conquistadors — the Spanish victors. Broken Spears was the first book to tell the story of the conquest from the Aztecs' perspective. It was originally published in Spanish in 1959 and first appeared in English in 1962.
The book begins a few years before the conquest by recounting the Aztecs' perceived omens of what was to come, and the remainder gives a chronological account of the conquest itself. The primary impetus of the book is not historical data-gathering but, rather, the storytelling and human emotion behind the Spanish conquest.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.