This paper examines the 1978 Camp David negotiations among U.S. President Jimmy Carter, Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin. It traces the events that led Carter to prioritize Middle East peace early in his presidency, analyzes the positions and strategies of each party, and explores the mediation tactics Carter employed to keep the talks alive. Drawing on primary accounts and scholarly works by William Quandt, Kenneth Stein, Bernard Reich, and Mitchell Bard, the paper also considers the reactions of other regional actors—particularly the Arab League—and evaluates the lasting significance of the Egypt-Israel peace treaty signed in March 1979.
The paper demonstrates effective comparative source synthesis: the same events are examined through multiple scholarly lenses (Carter's memoir, Quandt's insider account, Stein's diplomatic history, and Reich's documentary record), allowing the writer to triangulate claims and present a richer picture than any single source could provide. This technique is particularly evident in the section on each party's negotiating position.
The paper is organized around a series of guiding questions that function as implicit section headers, progressing logically from context (why Camp David happened) to process (how the talks unfolded) to outcome (what the accords achieved). Each section answers its governing question with cited evidence before transitioning to the next. The conclusion briefly synthesizes the paper's main findings and offers a judgment on Carter's contribution—a concise but appropriate closing move for a research paper of this scope.
"After four wars during 30 years, despite intensive human efforts, the Middle East, which is the cradle of civilization and the birthplace of three great religions, does not enjoy the blessings of peace. The people of the Middle East yearn for peace so that the vast human and natural resources of the region can be turned to the pursuits of peace and so that this area can become a model for coexistence and cooperation among nations." (Jerusalem Media & Communication Centre, 1978)
In 1977, U.S. President Jimmy Carter, early in his first year in the White House, had a powerful desire to bring some form of peace to the Middle East. Carter began holding meetings with various regional leaders to test out his ideas and to gauge where negotiations might lead. Those leaders included King Hussein of Jordan, Crown Prince Fahd of Saudi Arabia, Syrian President Hafez al-Assad, Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat.
According to Carter's book We Can Have Peace in the Holy Land, the president's White House staff and cabinet members knew "even before inauguration day" that bringing peace to the Middle East "would be at the top of my foreign affairs agenda for prompt action" (Carter, 2009, p. 17). He writes that upon reflection, the "most important single mission of my political life has been to assist in bringing peace to Israel and its neighbors and to promote human rights" (p. 17). Carter admits he did not have a firm grasp on the complex political situation in the Middle East, which involved many actors, but he "lost no time" getting down to the business of negotiating with the principal parties.
In approaching the historical Palestinian issues and the legitimate concerns of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)—juxtaposed with Israeli attitudes toward their neighbors—Carter was "constrained by previous American commitments not to recognize the PLO by diplomatic contract" or by any gesture that would "acknowledge" the PLO's authenticity (p. 20). With his hands tied by prior U.S. policy, Carter interacted with the PLO through surrogates: Syria, Jordan, and Egypt.
The advice Carter typically received from his political advisors was to "stay out of the Middle East controversy" until his second term (p. 20). In hindsight, that would have meant doing nothing, since there was no second term; Ronald Reagan defeated him in 1980. But Carter was "determined," he asserted on page 20, to at least "make an effort" to find a solution "on a more immediate and comprehensive basis" than had ever been attempted before. It was clear this was not an ego-driven initiative but a deeply personal mission, rooted in Carter's belief that previous presidents had not pushed hard enough toward a settlement.
In formulating a workable plan, Carter consulted broadly, including discussions with Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko. These talks were "somewhat strained" because it was publicly known that Carter had reached out to noted Jewish human rights advocates Andrei Sakharov and Natan Sharansky (p. 21). A widely published photograph showed Sakharov holding Carter's handwritten letter, which further strained relations with Soviet President Leonid Brezhnev. Nevertheless, reaching out to these figures paid dividends: "Within two years, annual Jewish immigration from Russia to the United States increased from a few hundred to more than fifty thousand," Carter explains on page 21. Moreover, Sharansky was released from a Soviet labor camp and later "gave our policies credit for having saved his life" (p. 21).
Carter also had to confront the thorny problem of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. The Israelis were in no mood to relinquish the settlements, and Sadat was deeply unhappy with the Israeli position. It looked as though conciliation was hopeless. Notwithstanding strong criticism from his own staff and advisors, Carter invited Begin and Sadat to Camp David, and both leaders accepted on August 8, 1978.
Carter explains (p. 37) that Sadat was outwardly willing to "accept almost anything" the president suggested, as long as Israel would agree to "withdraw from the Sinai" and that Palestinian rights would be respected. Begin was "more reluctant to make concessions" than the other members of the Israeli delegation. When Carter attempted to meet with both leaders together, discussions devolved into "shouting matches" (p. 37). The president therefore kept them separated and met with each leader independently over ten days.
In his book Heroic Diplomacy, author Kenneth W. Stein provides an extensive account of the discussions between Sadat and Begin leading up to Camp David. Stein points out that Sadat had boldly and courageously visited Israel in November 1977—well before the Camp David summit—becoming the first Egyptian president to set foot in modern Israel. Sadat demonstrated flexibility in the face of deep historical animosity between the two countries. During the visit he met with Begin at the King David Hotel and later visited the Dome of the Rock, the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, and the Al-Aqsa Mosque (Stein, 1999, p. 226). The political potency of the visit was magnified by the speech Sadat delivered to the Israeli Parliament (the Knesset), in which he "pulled no punches," as Stein describes.
Sadat said he had not come to make a deal with Israel, and acknowledged the "feeling of utter suspicion and lack of confidence between the Arab states and the Palestinian people on the one hand, and Israel on the other" (Stein, p. 226). He emphasized that Egypt wanted to live in peace with Israel while also asserting that the Palestinians had a right "to establish their own state" (Stein, p. 227).
Sadat's bold visit to Israel enraged his Arab counterparts, and the Arab world decided to "punish Egypt with isolation" (Stein, p. 229). Against this backdrop, Sadat and Begin began working together, and in the ten months between Sadat's visit and the Camp David summit, "a very significant amount of progress was made" toward narrowing their differences (Stein, p. 233). Nevertheless, their cooperation was insufficient for any breakthrough without the "active support of the White House and the president of the United States" (Stein, p. 233).
You’re 40% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.