This annotated bibliography examines the debate over conscription in Canada during World War Two, focusing on the sharp divisions between Francophone and Anglophone Canadians. Drawing on three key scholarly sources, the paper explores the political maneuvering of the Mackenzie King government, the historical roots of compulsory enlistment, and the wartime experiences of communities such as Verdun, Quebec. Together, these sources shed light on the economic, political, and social factors that drove support for or opposition to conscription, while offering lessons relevant to future Canadian military and national unity policy.
Research Question: Why were people in Canada for or against conscription during World War Two?
During both the First World War and the Second World War, conscription was enacted in various forms by the federal government, bringing about serious discord between Francophones and Anglophones. The latter were generally in support of the call-up, while the former group broadly opposed it. The need to understand the motivations behind those who opposed conscription and those who supported it cannot be overstated, particularly given the importance of preventing future policy decisions that might trigger similarly sharp divisions.
Ensuring that a collision between warring factions is not set in motion well in advance serves not only as a political measure promoting sensitivity to divergent views, but also as a strategic military measure fostering tactical commitment. This would help enable more efficient organization of manpower were Canada to find itself in a conflict situation such as the one encountered during World War Two. It is important to note that today, various factors of geopolitical significance further increase the risk of large-scale military conflict. Were this to happen, Canada could draw on the lessons from the World War Two enlistment controversy to better organize its national manpower.
J.L. Granatstein and J.M. Hitsman. 1977. Broken Promises: A History of Conscription in Canada. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
This book provides a detailed and compelling account of Canada's conscription history. By virtue of their backgrounds, both authors are well qualified to write on the subject. Granatstein has been widely recognized as an accomplished historian with extensive knowledge of Canadian history, having headed the Canadian War Museum, while Hitsman authored several works focused on military history. The text therefore passes the validity and relevance test with considerable strength.
The compulsory enlistment of civilians into military service has long been a contentious issue in Canada. This text will be used to examine the conduct of the Canadian government during World War Two, while simultaneously highlighting some of the issues that arose from the imposition of conscription. In doing so, the book is invaluable in assessing how the conscription debate affected the very fabric of the country's national unity. Thanks to its extensive coverage, it also provides a framework for determining whether — and how — the handling of conscription during the First World War may have prepared the ground for errors of omission or commission during the Second World War.
It is also noteworthy that the book recounts the roles of figures such as Lieutenant-General Ken Stuart in the Canadian Army's operational policy-making. This helps illuminate the genesis of manpower problems and how they were addressed at the time, building a broader case for Francophone dissatisfaction with compulsory enlistment policy.
"Mackenzie King's wartime political balancing act"
"Community-level wartime loyalty in Verdun, Quebec"
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.