This paper examines Canada's controversial response to the 2010 arrival of 490 Tamil asylum seekers aboard the MV Sun Sea off the British Columbia coast. It explores the historical context of Tamil persecution in Sri Lanka, tracing systemic oppression and the civil war beginning in 1983. The paper draws parallels between Canadian officials' security-based objections to the Tamil migrants and earlier discriminatory border policies, most notably the 1914 rejection of Indian migrants aboard the Komagata Maru. By comparing these incidents alongside the 1939 refusal of Jewish refugees on the MS St. Louis, the paper questions whether Canadian immigration and border policies have been driven by legitimate security concerns or by racism and xenophobia.
In 2010, a ship called the MV Sun Sea, carrying 490 asylum seekers from Sri Lanka, was intercepted off the British Columbia coast. The arrival of these Tamil migrants sparked a controversy regarding how Canada should receive Tamil and other potential refugees fleeing Southeast Asia. On one side of the debate, Canadian officials voiced concern that the migrants could be criminals and terrorists who should not be allowed to enter Canadian borders. On the other hand, these accusations may have been entirely baseless — originally put forward by the Sri Lankan government to deflect international attention from its own human rights abuses. Indeed, screenings of 76 Tamil migrants who had arrived from Sri Lanka in October 2009 revealed that all were eligible to claim political refugee status, despite rumors of potential criminal ties.
The debate surrounding whether to accept the Tamil migrants aboard the MV Sun Sea was reminiscent of similar controversies throughout Canadian history, dating back as early as the 1914 arrival of 376 Indians at Vancouver on the Komagata Maru. The similarities between Canada's rejection of migrant South Asian passengers aboard the Komagata Maru in 1914 and the aversion to Southeast Asian migrants aboard the MV Sun Sea in 2010 raise serious questions: are Canadian border policies grounded in racism and xenophobia, or in legitimate security interests?
Tamils of Sri Lanka have justifiable reason to seek refuge in other nations. Since as early as the 1950s, the majority Sinhalese-dominated government has systematically oppressed the Tamil minority, infringing on religious and linguistic freedoms and restricting freedom of movement and educational advancement. Over the years, the government's escalating efforts to stigmatize and marginalize the Tamil population led to growing resistance, eventually erupting into a brutal civil war in 1983. At that time, the Sri Lankan military initiated a massive campaign of violence that left an estimated 2,000 to 3,000 Tamils dead and tens of thousands displaced from their homes.
Human rights organizations have reported that, despite official denials from the 1980s through the present, the Sri Lankan government has initiated political killings, abductions, and armed clashes targeting Tamils. The United Nations is currently investigating thousands of unresolved disappearances of innocent civilians. The separatist resistance group, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), which formed in opposition to government repression, has also violated human rights and engaged in terrorist acts, mostly within Sri Lankan territory. Nonetheless, it is dangerous and irresponsible for the Canadian government and media to espouse speculative rhetoric suggesting that Tamil migrants are terrorists or have links to al-Qaeda.
"Ghadar movement and history of anti-Asian Canadian laws"
"Race-based laws targeted Indians, Japanese, and Chinese"
"Jewish refugees turned away, later killed in Nazi camps"
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.