This paper examines the major challenges associated with organizing and managing project teams in both domestic and international contexts. Drawing on project management literature, the paper explores how globalization, technology, and the COVID-19 pandemic have reshaped team structures and management expectations. It identifies high-priority challenges including risk management, cost management, communication, and ethics, as well as medium-priority concerns such as innovation and quality management. The analysis emphasizes the importance of accountability, adaptability, and lean operations as foundational pillars for effective project teams. The paper concludes that overcoming these challenges is essential for organizational competitiveness, stakeholder value, and sustainable performance in a rapidly evolving global environment.
Organizing and managing a project team is critical to organizational success in an increasingly globalized world. Due primarily to the interconnectedness of firms throughout the world, organizations both small and large require dynamic and responsive teams. These teams must collaborate with one another as organizations compete on a global scale. Compounding this challenge, technology is enabling more competitors to enter markets with little to no capital investment. These trends are still in their early stages and are causing massive disruption across seemingly unrelated industries.
Retail, for example, has seen a dramatic change in its operations from a global perspective. Many clothing manufacturers source their products from countries with low labor costs, ship them to wealthier developed nations, and operate at a global scale. All of these operations require a network of project teams, each with its own unique set of circumstances, needs, and capital requirements. If not managed properly, many retailers will simply cease to exist — as seen with dominant providers ranging from Sears to Neiman Marcus.
The retail industry is not the only sector that must deal with the implications of properly managing and organizing project teams. The energy sector is another example. Much like retail, energy relies heavily on managing and organizing project teams, and does so within a heavily regulated international context. Further compounding the issue is the emergence of renewable energy, which threatens the role that traditional energy suppliers play in a globalized world. Project teams involved in oil drilling operations, for instance, must operate under a wide range of regulations encompassing legal, environmental, and community obligations. To meet all of these requirements, project teams must be able to communicate and share information effectively. Technology helps to mitigate many of these communication barriers, allowing teams to collaborate seamlessly regardless of location.
Technology also plays an integral role in organizing and managing project teams more broadly. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated many of these trends as companies adopted technology to supplement their physical office environments. Video conferencing and streaming services allow for a faster and more streamlined exchange of information between teams. Task management software such as Asana or Slack gives management greater transparency into what a team is working on. These tools collectively allow for a more effective work experience for project team members irrespective of their location.
Although these trends favor the formation of project teams, managing them is not without challenges. These challenges — including cultural differences, language barriers, lack of accountability, unclear goals or success criteria, and inadequate risk management — are all highly relevant within an international context. This paper aims to identify common challenges associated with organizing and managing a team from both international and domestic perspectives. To overcome these challenges, managers must be more flexible in their thinking than past generations. In addition, depending on the industry in which the team operates, the ability to quickly access data and use it to make informed decisions will be critical.
This research is centered around the major challenges associated with organizing and managing a project team. The last few decades have seen rapid change in relation to project teams, their structure, and their configuration (PMI, 2017). Projects themselves have evolved to be much larger in scope and size, often with shorter timeframes for completion. Due primarily to technology and the rapid pace of innovation, project teams now face a litany of competitors vying for market leadership and dominance. There is now far more data available and far less reliance on paper. The project manager's profile has also changed, with fewer industry-specific experts filling that role — reflecting a shift from specialized to general project management.
Team management itself is also undergoing fundamental change. Organizations today seek to earn high returns on capital while establishing sustainable competitive advantages. These advantages depend on project teams' ability to identify company strengths and leverage them for organizational benefit. For technology-centric firms, project teams must also process data quickly and capitalize on "first mover advantage" when competing with other technology companies. Accordingly, project management is increasingly viewed as the method of choice for quality improvements and for strengthening an organization's ability to compete in a dynamic technology market.
Project management has been deemed a practical approach because it functions as a foundation of organizational strategy, closely aligned with the organization's overall direction. It is for these reasons that challenges related to project teams must be identified and addressed. Doing so first allows organizations to compete more effectively both globally and domestically. Second, it enables companies to continue innovating and developing products demanded by the market. Finally, overcoming these challenges allows all stakeholders — including shareholders, employees, and communities — to flourish.
COVID-19 has introduced new challenges related to remote work and its impact on collaborative performance in the absence of in-person interaction. This has created challenges tied to team culture and dynamics (Aarseth, Rolestadas, & Anderson, 2014). In developing competitive project teams and empowering managers to prepare for the future, organizations must determine the current challenges facing their teams and identify solutions. The major challenges that project teams face are summarized in this study.
This analysis aims to answer the following questions:
1. What are the main challenges within project teams from an international and domestic context?
2. How do these challenges impact the overall performance and efficiency of project management, and by extension, the organization as a whole?
3. What are the key parameters under each project management challenge that need to be addressed?
"Lean operations, accountability, and adaptability in literature"
"Categorized challenge table by importance and segment"
Importance: High | Challenge: Cost Management | Segments: Cost Estimation, Value Analysis, Profitability Analysis
Importance: High | Challenge: Communication Management | Segments: Virtual Communication, Adoption of Communication Technologies, Authenticity Checks on Digital Communication, Confidentiality
Importance: High | Challenge: Ethics Management | Segments: Personal Ethics, Organizational Ethics, Societal Ethics, Global Ethics
Importance: Medium | Challenge: Innovation and Creativity | Segments: Culture of Innovation, Knowledge Acquisition and Training, Hiring and Managing Workers
Importance: Medium | Challenge: Quality Management | Segments: Quality Assurance, Establishment of Measurement Metrics, Understanding of the Regulatory Environment
Project teams are now confronted with a large number of challenges that must be overcome in an increasingly globalized environment. First, project teams must be able to compete both internationally and domestically, irrespective of size. They must also leverage technology in ways that reduce costs while simultaneously increasing organizational efficiency. Teams must set clear, realistic, and actionable goals for the duration of a project, and hold themselves accountable for their actions and results while remaining flexible in their operations.
Among specific challenges, risk management stands out as the primary test for teams operating in a global environment. International operations carry such significant risk that teams must take great care to avoid systemic consequences that can severely impact the organization. These consequences can include financial risk, environmental risk, and political risk, among others. There are numerous examples of financial institutions that lacked proper oversight and risk management policies when conducting their operations internationally. The result was one of the most devastating financial crises in decades — the 2008 global financial crisis. This failure of risk management at the project team level contributed to the loss of jobs and homes, and to a severe economic contraction. A similar dynamic, even if on a smaller scale, can occur within any organization. It is therefore imperative that project teams address risk management challenges through proper oversight and technology.
Aarseth, W., Rolestadas, A., & Anderson, B. (2014). Managing organizational challenges in global projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7, 103–132.
Atkinson, R., Crawford, L., & Ward, S. (2006). Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 687–698.
Hwang, B.-G., & Ng, W. J. (2013). Project management knowledge and skills for green construction: Overcoming challenges. International Journal of Project Management, 31, 272–284.
Muller, R., & Jugdev, K. (2012). Critical success factors in projects. Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott – the elucidation of project success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 757–775.
Nogeste, K., & Walker, D. H. (2008). Development of a method to improve the definition and alignment of intangible project outcomes and tangible project outputs. International Journal of Management Project and Business, 1(2), 279–287.
PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
You’re 69% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.